Full Ring No Limit Poker Forums

Simple spot

or track by Email or RSS


flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

This forum seems like it's hurting for HHs!

Here's a very simple spot I found myself in the other day:

Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BTN: $290.89 (290.9 bb)
SB: $111.38 (111.4 bb)
BB: $198.49 (198.5 bb)
UTG+1: $103.50 (103.5 bb)
Hero (UTG+2): $152.22 (152.2 bb)
MP1: $139.20 (139.2 bb)
MP2: $95.80 (95.8 bb)
MP3: $113.63 (113.6 bb)
CO: $121.67 (121.7 bb)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with Ks Kc
UTG+1 folds, Hero raises to $2.50, 2 folds, MP3 calls $2.50, CO raises to $12, 3 folds, Hero calls $9.50, MP3 folds

Flop: ($28) 5c 3d 6h (2 players)
Hero checks, CO checks

Turn: ($28) 7h (2 players)
Hero bets $16.20, CO raises to $42, Hero folds

Results: $60.40 pot ($2.72 rake)
Final Board: 5c 3d 6h 7h
Hero mucked Ks Kc and lost (-$28.20 net)
CO mucked and won $57.68 ($29.48 net)

Villain is 15/11 3% 3bet. I really doubt his range for 3betting me is much wider than AA and some sort of "bluff" hand which he's folding to a 4bet (AK? AQ?).

So, the question is on the turn does he have AhQh/AhKh often enough for it to be a jam? I folded quickly at the time because nits take weird lines with AA all the time, but upon reconsidering it's a line which really makes much more sense with a turned flush draw.

He probably views me as a bad$#% mother%$##@$, if that helps at all.

Posted about 1 year ago

micsquab

Avatar for micsquab

744 posts
Joined 09/2010

I think the 4 bet is good line here pre.

Posted about 1 year ago

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

Against his likely range in this spot I think 4bet-calling is around -4.2bbs (-6.7bbs global). 4bet-folding might be breakeven or even winning if he's bluffing a little more often than we think he is. I think calling should show a decent profit though, so I'd rather just do that.

Posted about 1 year ago

meowjr

Avatar for meowjr

535 posts
Joined 02/2011

Against his likely range in this spot I think 4bet-calling is around -4.2bbs (-6.7bbs global). 4bet-folding might be breakeven or even winning if he's bluffing a little more often than we think he is. I think calling should show a decent profit though, so I'd rather just do that.


I'm a little confused by this....You're calling w/ KK to set mine?

Posted about 1 year ago

SchFerreira

Avatar for SchFerreira

310 posts
Joined 11/2011

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

Calling with KK to play postflop against a range of 6 AA, 1 KK, ~8 AK/AQ/A8s type hands.

Posted about 1 year ago

micsquab

Avatar for micsquab

744 posts
Joined 09/2010

Calling with KK to play postflop against a range of 6 AA, 1 KK, ~8 AK/AQ/A8s type hands.



Ok I think you are justified 4 betting this and calling all in if he 5bet shoves. QQ+AKs vs, KK you have 52% equity vs, this range. I don't think you should be assigning a nit AA range every time he 3bets you when you are UTG.

Posted about 1 year ago

prestonp

Avatar for prestonp

322 posts
Joined 11/2009

How many hands is this data over? It seems unreasonable to say that 3-betting must be AA.

Posted about 1 year ago

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

Sample is 2.6k hands, villain 3bets 2.6%, 3bets vs EP <1%, has squeezed one time (this time) out of 167 opportunities. I'm already weighting his range somewhat wider than the sample suggests.

Very very unlikely he is 3betting to stack off with QQ or AK. I'd guess we can be something like 98% confident that 4betting to call is worse than folding, but maybe there's a 40% chance that 4bet-fold is slightly winning.

Posted about 1 year ago

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

Also calling here is massively +EV so even if 4betting is somehow break-even it's still going to be giving away 4-5bbs in equity compared to the best play.

Posted about 1 year ago

shuttle

Avatar for shuttle

3359 posts
Joined 11/2008

Not that I'd think of this at the table but I think check calling turn might be better

Posted about 1 year ago

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

After seeing him raise turn and feeling like it's a fold check/calling seems better, but if we start with the assumption that he cbets AA otf we should just be winning the pot all the time and protecting ourselves from his 6% equity.

The more I think about this hand the more I think he is fos a lot on the turn.

Posted about 1 year ago

shuttle

Avatar for shuttle

3359 posts
Joined 11/2008

We really don't need to protect vs 6% equity if he either bluffs river a non-zero amount or calls river lighter after we check turn.

Posted about 1 year ago

flavas

Avatar for flavas

51 posts
Joined 10/2008

True, seems like it's a good spot for a turn check in a vacuum, unless all of the times he raises turn he has a worse hand Smile

Posted about 1 year ago

prestonp

Avatar for prestonp

322 posts
Joined 11/2009

Top 3% is roughly 40 hands. If he's going to fold to a 4 bet with all but AA and KK, then you're getting 12 in 40 or 2.3 to 1 on a 3-bet to take down the pot. Knowing that, you can start 4-bet bluffing with suited Aces and Kings. If you're risking less than 2.3x the current pot you should show an immediate profit.

Posted about 1 year ago




HomePoker ForumsFull Ring No Limit → Simple spot