General Poker Discussion Poker Forums

So drakken, the change that we don't know the full truth about 9/11 is equal to believing in unicorns?

Yes that's exactly what he meant

Yes that's exactly what he meant

LOL

Please accept.

no

LOL 15 posts per page!

The United States of America Incorporated's official account of 911 is itself a conspiracy theory.

Yes that's exactly what he meant

It's like he can read into my fragile little mind!

Tell me, did you get these powers from the Reptilians? I'd like to use that to make fortune in poker.

this thread is desperately lacking in musical interludes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzkhSJkx7GY


I've got a word or two
To say about the things that you do
You're telling all those lies
About the good things that we can have
If we close our eyes

Do what you want to do
And go where you're going to
Think for yourself
'Cause I won't be there with you

I left you far behind
The ruins of the life that you have in mind
And though you still can't see
I know your mind's made up
You're gonna cause more misery

Do what you want to do
And go where you're going to
Think for yourself
'Cause I won't be there with you

Although your mind's opaque
Try thinking more if just for your own sake
The future still looks good
And you've got time to rectify
All the things that you should

Do what you want to do
And go where you're going to
Think for yourself
'Cause I won't be there with you

Do what you want to do
And go where you're going to
Think for yourself
'Cause I won't be there with you
Think for yourself
'Cause I won't be there with you

http://greyleonard.com/du/WTC7Hit1.jpg

When I look at this picture, I don't see fires. I see thousands of tons of concrete and steel pulverized into dust.

WTC7 was 48 story building. WTC 1 and 2 which are totally dustified are 110 stories. The energy required to have this happen does not exist in fires.

Go to the largest building in your city. Then imagine ten stories per second collapsing through themselves and disintegrating to dust because of fire and damage.

To even conceive that fires and impact damage are responsible, well, it is pure double think.

http://greyleonard.com/du/WTC7Hit1.jpg

When I look at this picture, I don't see fires. I see thousands of tons of concrete and steel pulverized into dust.

WTC7 was 48 story building. WTC 1 and 2 which are totally dustified are 110 stories. The energy required to have this happen does not exist in fires.

Go to the largest building in your city. Then imagine ten stories per second collapsing through themselves and disintegrating to dust because of fire and damage.

To even conceive that fires and impact damage are responsible, well, it is pure double think.

Do you have anything to support this claim?

http://greyleonard.com/du/WTC7Hit1.jpg

When I look at this picture, I don't see fires. I see thousands of tons of concrete and steel pulverized into dust.

WTC7 was 48 story building. WTC 1 and 2 which are totally dustified are 110 stories. The energy required to have this happen does not exist in fires.

Go to the largest building in your city. Then imagine ten stories per second collapsing through themselves and disintegrating to dust because of fire and damage.

To even conceive that fires and impact damage are responsible, well, it is pure double think.

I am not sure what point you are tring to make here - are you saying that something else rather than the collapse actually pulverized the buildings? If some agency did want to destroy the twin towers/wtc7 buildings wouldn't they do so with a controlled demolition approach and if so this must be the amount of dust produced. Are you actually saying that some agency wanted to destroy the building but did not use controlled demolition they instead decided to use method a,b,c,....x,y,z instead? A method that results in lots of dust. If the anser is yes then we can throw out and completely eliminate the argument that the WTC7 must be a controlled demolition and we just might be getting somewhere in this thread.

Do you have anything to support this claim?

It's basic high school physics man. Are you too dumb to understand basic high school physics? 1500 Engineers understand basic high school physics.

haha that was actually a pretty good one mitch, h/t

Do you have anything to support this claim?

I am not claiming anything SCS. I am stating what I am observing. Two different things entirely.

I am not sure what point you are tring to make here - are you saying that something else rather than the collapse actually pulverized the buildings? If some agency did want to destroy the twin towers/wtc7 buildings wouldn't they do so with a controlled demolition approach and if so this must be the amount of dust produced. Are you actually saying that some agency wanted to destroy the building but did not use controlled demolition they instead decided to use method a,b,c,....x,y,z instead? A method that results in lots of dust. If the anser is yes then we can throw out and completely eliminate the argument that the WTC7 must be a controlled demolition and we just might be getting somewhere in this thread.

Yes exactly to your first question. Fires do not account for the vast amount of energy required to do that to a building. With regards to the second question, there is not an easy answer, other than to say fires and impact damage are clearly not responsible. Look at the picture for a few minutes, then ask yourself, are fires and impact damage really responsible? It's quite clearly impossible. If it were possible, please cite a single reference where anything similar has occurred in any steel framed concrete reinforced building, be it fires, impact damage, or both.

http://greyleonard.com/du/WTC7Hit1.jpg

When I look at this picture, I don't see fires. I see thousands of tons of concrete and steel pulverized into dust.

WTC7 was 48 story building. WTC 1 and 2 which are totally dustified are 110 stories. The energy required to have this happen does not exist in fires.

Go to the largest building in your city. Then imagine ten stories per second collapsing through themselves and disintegrating to dust because of fire and damage.

To even conceive that fires and impact damage are responsible, well, it is pure double think.

I am not claiming anything SCS. I am stating what I am observing. Two different things entirely.

???