Secret HQ Poker Forums

Meeting is needed indeed...

Isac just ain't home

damnit

but I like the idea of a sweating session, just as long as there is no heavy discussion going on in hand as that really can confuse the one playing.

2.67 Flop
3.03 Turn
2.40 River

2.67 Flop
3.03 Turn
2.40 River

what about the frequency? It tells more about your playing style I believe...

BTW BTN steal at 44% is that supposed to be high

?

what about the frequency? It tells more about your playing style I believe...

BTW BTN steal at 44% is that supposed to be high

?

58.3 flop
50.4 turn
47.4 river

BAD BEAT

Now we are not even allowed a little creativity anymore

http://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Uddannelse/uddoversigt/Bachelor/negot_turisme/Blanketter/ForsideFriHj%20opg.ashx

What a front page

Damnit this sucks

BAD BEAT

Now we are not even allowed a little creativity anymore

http://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Uddannelse/uddoversigt/Bachelor/negot_turisme/Blanketter/ForsideFriHj%20opg.ashx

What a front page

Damnit this sucks

WTF is "FAG" in English? I highly doubt it's a true/false response.

fag = course or subject

fag = course or subject

cover story imo

I helped on the BGLL home game vid!! I'm excited to do a member vid now!

ship it

Quick question

What's the lowest you'll go with suited connectors 4 to the flop from SB?

Had a hand come with a post flop time bomb, frequent bluffer and super lp called 45s, too low?

Quick question

What's the lowest you'll go with suited connectors 4 to the flop from SB?

Had a hand come with a post flop time bomb, frequent bluffer and super lp called 45s, too low?

Did you have to call a raise or did you complete?

Quick question

What's the lowest you'll go with suited connectors 4 to the flop from SB?

Had a hand come with a post flop time bomb, frequent bluffer and super lp called 45s, too low?

If it's 2 or more limps to me in the SB I'll call with any 2 suited, if it's Raised and cold-called twice and I'm in the BB I'll also call with any 2 suited. Bascially 7-1 = Any 2 suited

I got it a little wrong actually i was BB, the guy closing the action was always going overlimp and not limp reraise. So on the call I was getting 6.5/1 a bit thin but as bad as i thought thankfully. Hard to weigh implied odds sometimes i'm finding. I'll post the hand later it was quite funny how it played out in the end.

I don't know if any of you guys and girls are good at maths but i decided to give myself some serious public head fuckery in this thread.

http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/5-Beginner-SS-Limit-Hold-em/topics/21035-AJs-4-ways-from-SB?page=1&per_page=30#post-body-156174

If you could take a look it would be awsome as i'm pretty much guessing how to do it.

I don't know if any of you guys and girls are good at maths but i decided to give myself some serious public head fuckery in this thread.

http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/5-Beginner-SS-Limit-Hold-em/topics/21035-AJs-4-ways-from-SB?page=1&per_page=30#post-body-156174

If you could take a look it would be awsome as i'm pretty much guessing how to do it.

No idea if I'm good at math, but atleast I'm improving.
Yeah, I just saw it, sitting on laggy net and with family all around I just can't concentrate on it with all the interruption But if I forget, please link me to the thread when I get back home, looks really good.

http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/5-Beginner-SS-Limit-Hold-em/topics/21035-AJs-4-ways-from-SB?page=1&per_page=30#post-body-156174

I consider myself to be pretty dumb at poker, and I have to admit that I'd never use math to evaluate this hand. I'd think:
"I raise because I have AJs. I call a 3 bet because I don't have a good enough hand to cap. I check into the PF aggressor because I have top pair and I'm going to get him for a x/r. I continuation bet the turn becuase I doubt the 8 helped him. Villian is more than welcome to call down with JJ or KQ or whatever other losing hand his line is telling me he has." That would be the extent of my analysis.