Messiah
277 posts
Joined 01/2008
mudbuddha
4 posts
Joined 01/2008
Well, if he is really playing that loose i think that you would have to bet the turn as well. this is a scary card and you need to take the initiative rather than let him take control of this hand.
If he is really playing this loose, he may be floating you with a wide range of hands. With that in mind I don't really think that checking is an option here. Although a lot of hands just crushed your hand (KQ, 89, 2 pairs etc.)
As for the size of the turn bet, I think with an aggressive regular like this, he will often make moves on this sort of turn, So I think about 175 is okay, (AK is only a small part of ur range right). I think that betting the turn (so that he knows that he may be facing a large river bet) but then not putting much money on the river is a decent way to approach the turn/river..
maybe 1/2 pot for most rivers would prevent him from making any ridiculous moves.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
KRANTZ
Founder
2959 posts
Joined 07/2007
DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
3096 posts
Joined 10/2007
KRANTZ
Founder
2959 posts
Joined 07/2007
Kwantum
694 posts
Joined 01/2008
Def agree w/KRANTZ that you gotta bet more on this flop. It's pretty coordinated, hands like KQ and AKs with backdoor draws are going to peel more often when you bet less. By betting more you discourage bluff-raises and floating, and you also make the pot bigger so it's easier for you to get the money in on later streets when you do improve or want to stack off.
I haven't played a ton with acehole888, but FTP 2/4 is one of my regular games. I will say this much, even if he has Ace-rag suited like A8/A9, he's not the type to ever laydown when he hits his Ace, especially if he's tilting he probably stacks with any J or A here. I would definitely put AK/AQ/AJ/A-rag in his range here as well as any number of draws like 88/99/KQ/KJ/QJ/J8/J9.
You said there is a lot of history, I think that's important to know. What do we think his view of us is given the history?
By default, I like a check here for reasons already stated by Sensei/KRANTZ. I'm not sure about a C/R, I would lean towards a C/F more but that of course depends on the history and table dynamic. I wouldn't put much credence in the "Acehole888" is horrible stuff just because people say he's a horrible reg on the 2+2 FTP Regulars thread.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Messiah
277 posts
Joined 01/2008
As soon as I c-bet I knew it was too small, so this is not standard here for me.
As far as our history, we have battled when I do play FTP (as he logs a ton of hands at 200 and 400nl), and he views me as a capable regular and I have seen him more apt to try to get tricky because he knows I am a 'thinking player' so I guess he thinks I can make laydowns. I know this though and have and will adapt.
With that said given this history, if I check this turn I feel he and most of this type of opponent bets here (if checked to) almost always.
I feel like the only thing to do here is lead, but what size? If I bet 175 and he shoves its only ~212 more to me, now what? I think if I barrel smaller here as a "I'm bet/folding" he almost always shoves ATC.
In a vacuum, this hand isn't as interesting as it is to me, I think because I am not conveying villian/history properly.
If we check/raise we are obviously calling a shove, I assume?
Anyway next action will come shortly...
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Kwantum
694 posts
Joined 01/2008
If we check/raise we are obviously calling a shove, I assume?
Yeah, always calling a shove if we C/R that turn given the stacks.
Based on what you said, I think I am liking what DJ Sensei said. If he's going to bet his entire range when the A comes, then you should show a profit, because a ton of the time he has a pair+draw and he can't fold when he bets the turn and you CRAI.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
luciddream
6 posts
Joined 01/2008
i've played a decent amount w/ villain. he would prob c/r AJ on the flop. his range on the flop is pretty wide as well and even tho he might raise w/ pair+gutter on the flop looking to get it in he might not too cause of stack sizes.(pretty sure he isn't even thinking about some of this stuff and almost just does stuff randomly sometimes)
i think chk'ing and betting are both fine vs him but if i bet it would be a smaller amount i thought would induce a push. if i chk'd it would be to c/r ai cause he is def capable of betting KJ or even a hand like 88 or 99 on the turn because he plays really bad.
and def bet more on the flop. usually u don't need to bet so much in 3bet pots but the more draw heavy they are and the more your opponent likes to call the more u should bet.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
poker12
53 posts
Joined 01/2008
KRANTZ
Founder
2959 posts
Joined 07/2007
Dave, if you bet here, you can't ever bet/fold without being exploited. Bet/call and then figure out the optimal strategy against him in the future.
Completely disagree that people will auto-bet here if you check to them- if they have showdown value, they're not usually betting, and it's completely conceivable you would check an ace.
I think I tend to check/fold, and value bet river if he checks back... but betting and calling it off is close behind.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
etats360
24 posts
Joined 01/2008
Against this player, I'd go for a C/R. His 3bet calling range is huge, and he floats a ton. He checks behind the turn with most hands with showdown value (even Ax sometimes), but he will bet his entire air range when checked to. If he checks the turn through, I'd probably c/f most non-Q rivers.
edit: I wouldn't fold on a K river, either. 
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote