obadonke
1647 posts
Joined 03/2009
Time Link to 00:38:43
I'm learning NL and came to this video series first following a recommendation in the first episode of the Bonzai Tree series.
This FtGU Episode Two really helped me to get a basic idea of hands to play and hands to avoid. However, I struggled to get a clear set of hands from the sections explaining what to do facing a raise (from about 33:00, through to the linked section).
Given that there's a fair amount of hand-waving here (i.e. the hands to play depend on many factors) and at my stage of the game, I'm making much bigger mistakes postflop than pre, I suppose it doesn't really matter but thought I'd comment for the record.
On the plus side, the confusion prompted me to put a lot more effort into choosing a default range than I would have done had the info been easier to glean from the video. So maybe I should just say: good job! 
Posted over 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
INSTA-legend
2 posts
Joined 08/2010
Turkish Fish
236 posts
Joined 07/2010
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
tubasteve
7647 posts
Joined 11/2007
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
glad to see people are still getting a lot out of this series. just goes to show that even as games get tougher and the dynamics change, sound fundamentals are still the main key to success.
For sure. Thanks again. Excellent work from you guys.
Posted over 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
Um, Tuba... May I ask,
I'm just looking again at your thoughts on opening in the BB with limpers.
What is your opinion about opening any Axs in the BB when there are limpers (high likelyhood of being OOP multiway)
Do you think it's too spewy because you'll have to fold too many flops, and flopping an Ace is going to be a gross prospect multiway with A4s...but flopping a flush-draw is going to have better implied odds in the nano-stakes where I play because so many bad players will stack off with just top pair ignoring the fact that I'm shovelling money in on the turned flush...
Posted over 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
jens123
85 posts
Joined 06/2010
Can you elaborate a bit on implied odds that you talk about on your last or second to last slide I should say. I hear it thrown around a lot and have some understanding of it but not quite complete. Im not sure if there's an easy or good answer for that because I think it entails a lot, but any clarification would help.
Would 3 betting a little over pot in the blinds, or early position what we are going for?
Posted over 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Turkish Fish
236 posts
Joined 07/2010
Can you elaborate a bit on implied odds that you talk about on your last or second to last slide I should say. I hear it thrown around a lot and have some understanding of it but not quite complete. Im not sure if there's an easy or good answer for that because I think it entails a lot, but any clarification would help.
Would 3 betting a little over pot in the blinds, or early position what we are going for?
implied odds = future value. how much money you stand to win on future streets, such as if you flop your set or turn your flush or strait. it is purely theoretical, like fold equity, and can only be estimated. however, you can put a maximum on implied odds, it is the whole stack.
yes think 3betting a lil over pot OOP is exactly what we're going for.
Posted over 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Tunnelvisie
11 posts
Joined 08/2009
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
Tunnelvisie
11 posts
Joined 08/2009
stanmore
3507 posts
Joined 03/2010
Kazm
362 posts
Joined 12/2009