Micro Stakes Online NL Poker Forums

No problem, this is an open forum and discussion is what brings me back posting to this site even though it is less frequently right now.

That is what I thought you would say. I believe because of his high 3bet percentage (8 seems really high especially for full ring) that AK AQ JJ TT should be considered hands that he almost always would reraise you pre. I believe there are not too many flush draws in his range here and screams of an individual who is incapable of betting for value which is seen frequently at these limits. Given that I would still end up calling flop and reacessing on the turn though I would never lead out on turn as it really accomplishes nothing.

I put his range down to his PFR, it's quite small compared to VPIP but VPIP is big enough to include AQ, 78 etc

And also as EuEra said, I didn't take into consideration his 3 bet stats as I don't have at least 100 hand sample (think I got this from verneer's guide).

I would fold but imo 3 betting the flop is bad. You are never crushed vs a FD i have no idea what adriano is talking about.

Dude, why are you talking about single FD's? I said FD's and sets which is pretty likely when we get raised here. As you know a range is not only FD's or only sets it's a combination of different strenght hands. Sure his range can be wider but vs a value range we are crushed.

Board: 5s 6c 9c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 23.215% 22.61% 00.61% 2686 72.00 { JcJh }
Hand 1: 76.785% 76.18% 00.61% 9050 72.00 { 99, 66-55, AcTc, KcQc, QcTc }

Dude, why are you talking about single FD's? I said FD's and sets which is pretty likely when we get raised here. Sure his range can be wider but vs a value range we are crushed.

Board: 5s 6c 9c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 23.215% 22.61% 00.61% 2686 72.00 { JcJh }
Hand 1: 76.785% 76.18% 00.61% 9050 72.00 { 99, 66-55, AcTc, KcQc, QcTc }

Your wording was just a bit confusing

Your wording was just a bit confusing

I said:

We are crushed vs sets and FD's with an overcard have great eq vs our hand.

Do you mean vs a range of sets and FDs with an overcard or vs sets and vs FDs with an overcard lol. If you mean vs that range then yes obviously we are dominated.

I think he means the whole range, not that we are crushed by FD's with an overcard without even mentioning sets.