Lelantos
307 posts
Joined 09/2011
I feel quite hopeless about improving much on my own (confirmation of my thoughts from a whiny post before) but will try to learn something before getting a coach, for now I will start posting some hands. How many people get far without a coach these days that's how I look at it.
What do you think about AKo pre flop SPECIFICALLY at 10NL against unknowns/TAG players with small sample. I think I'm going to far now. I think I'll change to calling preflop.
IF my memory is correct I hardly ever see shoves with QQ and JJ preflop at 10NL, and when I shove QQ it's almost always up against AA, KK and AK
Poker Stars $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em - 5 players - View hand 1721440
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter
BTN: $5.14
SB: $10.32
BB: $10.10
Hero (UTG): $9.90
CO: $8.95
Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is UTG with A
K 
Hero raises to $0.30, 2 folds, SB raises to $1, 1 fold, Hero raises to $2.40, SB raises to $10.32 all in, 1 fold
Now this was after I just sat down at a table and couldn't even call, because I hardly ever expect to see pairs worse than KK unless a known bad player. So could I switch to calling preflop with AK?
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
IAGTTAYM
AIF
821 posts
Joined 03/2008
PokerNun
341 posts
Joined 08/2010
Lelantos
307 posts
Joined 09/2011
Yeah, it's the first time I've done that with AK, because of the thought of what gets shoved all in. Then I knew it was very wrong. I don't like calling a 3bet against me being I'm UTG so fold I guess, that that feels wrong too!
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Lelantos
307 posts
Joined 09/2011
PanicIwould
646 posts
Joined 08/2010
Alright and if no A or K on flop?
This is what is bad about just calling. You are going to be put in a tough spot on a lot of flops.
I think you should be either getting it in or just folding to his 3bet. Based on the fact that he is 3betting your UTG range I would be more inclined to fold. I would estimate that his 3bet range here preflop is super strong.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.104% 36.02% 03.09% 19735570 1690824.50 { AhKd }
Hand 1: 60.896% 57.81% 03.09% 31676509 1690824.50 { 99+, AKs }
This is if he is 3betting a 3% value range here. His range would need to be much wider for us to be even a slight favorite.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 52.771% 46.03% 06.74% 56753119 8306097.50 { AhKd }
Hand 1: 47.229% 40.49% 06.74% 49920574 8306097.50 { 88+, ATs+, KTs+, AQo+ }
So it is probably just fold in this particular spot. However, I dont think you should be looking to fold AK too often preflop. Every situation is different so you have to make the best decision with the information you have in each spot.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shuttle
3333 posts
Joined 11/2008
StueysKid
969 posts
Joined 11/2009
micsquab
694 posts
Joined 09/2010
I am going to go against the grain here and say I dont mind your 4 bet fold. reason being is its 5 handed and so AK, AQ, AJs start looking like the nuts and are over valued. If sb is 3 betting with AA, KK and u just call then what when the A or K flops? When villain 5 bet shoves u know almost for a fact QQ+. Disclaimer..I am still learning.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
wangtangkiki
22 posts
Joined 05/2011
I am going to go against the grain here and say I dont mind your 4 bet fold. reason being is its 5 handed and so AK, AQ, AJs start looking like the nuts and are over valued. If sb is 3 betting with AA, KK and u just call then what when the A or K flops? When villain 5 bet shoves u know almost for a fact QQ+. Disclaimer..I am still learning.
Why would you 4bet then fold AK if it becomes the nuts 5 handed? Villains would be 3betting for value a lot wider when it's short handed.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
xsAir
73 posts
Joined 03/2012
micsquab
694 posts
Joined 09/2010
Why would you 4bet then fold AK if it becomes the nuts 5 handed? Villains would be 3betting for value a lot wider when it's short handed.
Thats why I like the 4bet. Once he shoves from the sb u know QQ+ and not 3bet bluff or 3bet light without reads.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
SCS
6245 posts
Joined 06/2008
Thats why I like the 4bet. Once he shoves from the sb u know QQ+ and not 3bet bluff or 3bet light without reads.
Hero has to call 7.50 to win a 12.70 pot. AKo's equity against QQ+/AK is 39%.
EVcall = 12.70(.39) - 7.50(.61) = 4.95 - 4.56 = 0.39
If villain's stack off range is tighter than that then it becomes a -ev call. But if that were the case, we shouldn't be 4 betting in the first place.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
micsquab
694 posts
Joined 09/2010
I would assume sb only calls/folds the 4 bet with AKo, AQs AJs TT, JJ. Shoves with QQ+ given the positions. The fact that it is 5 handed and hero has blockers AK the 4 bet isn't that bad to me. I wouldn't treat the sb range the same as if it was full ring or 6 handed until this happens. Forcing the sb to define his perceived range pre rather than calling and stacking off post flop to AA KK seems better to me. Poker stove is telling me hero is only 30% vs. villains QQ+ range.
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
uselink
1321 posts
Joined 06/2010
If you are going to 4bet/fold your AK. You could just do it with 72o (since it will be a bluff)
So either 4bet/call. If you are not going to call his shove over your 4bet, you should just flat the 3bet!
Posted about 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote