Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by linkwood (Micro/Small Stakes)

DC Shorts: Linkwood (#5) - Micro-stakes Part 4

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

DC Shorts: Linkwood (#5) - Micro-stakes Part 4 by linkwood

Linkwood is doing a mini-series at his $0.05/0.10 session and he's quizzing you on hands. This is hand 4 of 4.

About DC Shorts Subscribe to

DC shorts are short content bursts brought to you by DC Labs. Roughly 1/4 the length of standard videos, these shorts are designed to review single hands, concepts or ideas. You'll receive the most up to date content available and stay in touch with the latest and greatest here at DC and the poker community at large.  The more you post in the forums the more likely it is your post will be the inspiration for a future DC short!

Tags

linkwood dc shorts hh review hand replayer 10nl 10 nl nlhe ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 14 minutes long
  • Posted about 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for DC Shorts: Linkwood (#5) - Micro-stakes Part 4

or track by Email or RSS


BananinSok

Avatar for BananinSok

4 posts
Joined 04/2011

First of all I would like to thank you for making this series.

So what do I think he has? For now, lets put on a side that he is tight player. Player on your right opened preflop, and got you and a SB as a caller. BB actually had to pay just 0.2$ for a 1$ pot atm (with his call total pot is 1,2$), in this case he could call with any two. Its a possability, but I doubt that a tight player would do this. Well wouldnt be surprised at these limits, everything is possible Smile

Donk bet on a flop --> probably he was thinking that with it he will push at least two players out of the pot if not all, which he did. Just you called him. The turn paired the board, and he checked, you bet, he min-raises. I'm quite sure he hasn't got pocket fives, and that for sure he wouldn't donk on the flop with lets say A5s or A5o. Does he has pocket nines? Could be, maybe because of that he made that donk bet as he was happy to see trips (he can be quite sure that any Q will pay him off) and also to "protect" his hand against flush draw. IMO players on this limit would for sure call if they would have flush draw!

What is his hand? As said 99 is possible, but IMO he has a strong Q, AQ or KQ. He probably min-raised you as he is "putting" you on a flush draw and thinks that you will fold after his raise. I would suggest push, as most probably you are ahead (in case he hasnt got pocket nines or 5 (less likely)). If you are behind you still have well (in case he has nines full with fives) two more outs, good luck Smile

Posted about 2 years ago

SCS

Avatar for SCS

6245 posts
Joined 06/2008

In regards to the turn bet sizing, the value we lose from when villain c/f his draws (which I don't necessarily think he does) is made up for by the value we gain from the times villain c/c KQ, QJ, QT, etc

Posted about 2 years ago

BananinSok

Avatar for BananinSok

4 posts
Joined 04/2011

First of all I would like to thank you for making this series.

So what do I think he has? For now, lets put on a side that he is tight player. Player on your right opened preflop, and got you and a SB as a caller. BB actually had to pay just 0.2$ for a 1$ pot atm (with his call total pot is 1,2$), in this case he could call with any two. Its a possability, but I doubt that a tight player would do this. Well wouldnt be surprised at these limits, everything is possible Smile

Donk bet on a flop --> probably he was thinking that with it he will push at least two players out of the pot if not all, which he did. Just you called him. The turn paired the board, and he checked, you bet, he min-raises. I'm quite sure he hasn't got pocket fives, and that for sure he wouldn't donk on the flop with lets say A5s or A5o. Does he has pocket nines? Could be, maybe because of that he made that donk bet as he was happy to see trips (he can be quite sure that any Q will pay him off) and also to "protect" his hand against flush draw. IMO players on this limit would for sure call if they would have flush draw!

What is his hand? As said 99 is possible, but IMO he has a strong Q, AQ or KQ. He probably min-raised you as he is "putting" you on a flush draw and thinks that you will fold after his raise. I would suggest push, as most probably you are ahead (in case he hasnt got pocket nines or 5 (less likely)). If you are behind you still have well (in case he has nines full with fives) two more outs, good luck Smile

EDIT: If he has JTo or JTs, this would be a weird move from him (or not), even though he still has a lot of outs. Actually even if you push him he will call you for sure...

Posted about 2 years ago

SCS

Avatar for SCS

6245 posts
Joined 06/2008



What is his hand? As said 99 is possible, but IMO he has a strong Q, AQ or KQ. He probably min-raised you as he is "putting" you on a flush draw and thinks that you will fold after his raise. I would suggest push, as most probably you are ahead (in case he hasnt got pocket nines or 5 (less likely)). If you are behind you still have well (in case he has nines full with fives) two more outs, good luck Smile



Do you really think villain will check the turn with Qx after leading the flop? And then c/r really small?

Posted about 2 years ago

UknowMe

Avatar for UknowMe

98 posts
Joined 07/2010

Do you really think villain will check the turn with Qx after leading the flop? And then c/r really small?


not really. this small c/r looks like Villian is luring Hero into the pot. With Qx he would be affraid of giving Hero a freecard or the right price to draw.

Posted about 2 years ago

SCS

Avatar for SCS

6245 posts
Joined 06/2008

not really. this small c/r looks like Villian is luring Hero into the pot. With Qx he would be affraid of giving Hero a freecard or the right price to draw.



Yeah, agree with this. I don't think villain cares if a we call and a club comes on the river, or if we check behind either.

Posted about 2 years ago

BananinSok

Avatar for BananinSok

4 posts
Joined 04/2011

Do you really think villain will check the turn with Qx after leading the flop? And then c/r really small?



Well it's possible, I think that everyone from us already did this. I agree that his min raise is weird, it can be a monster or also as a bluff, as he is putting us on a flush draw, and he probably thinks we will fold (we have to have in mind that these are micro limits). I'm quite sure he doesnt have AA or KK, as he would already raise preflop (if he has, well not a nice spot for AA with 4 handed flop). Interesting situation, would really like to know what happend.

Posted about 2 years ago

event78

Avatar for event78

38 posts
Joined 05/2010

I dont like your size on the turn, now you have to fold, because he almost only have value hands that bet us.

1,5$ much better size imo.



With a small bet, you will lose value on Qx/draws. With these hands, he's definitely calling the turn. If he decided to c/c with draws, he would do it whatever the bet size is. We need to take as much value as possible on draws/Qx and some weird 9x (9cxc) plus we set the stack size for a river shove.

His range for checking the turn is mainly Qx/draws/9x/give up. I think the check raise will be pretty rare and I dont expect him to do it with a draw (nitty guy probably passive), especially with this sizing where he does not look for FE.
I expect him to c/c most of his Qx. Even if his value range is pretty small, from a nitty guy (probably not capable of big moves) his range to do this is Q9s/99/QQ?/55 imo. As the sizing is small flop/it was multiway preflop and we don't have reads/a lot of stats on the guy, I wouldn't completely deny 5x (54s/56s/A5s) from his range. He could DB for information/semibluff and it would make sence with his line. So, I would fold turn.

Posted about 2 years ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

Nice turn sizing now fold. Pokerstove is useless in this spot btw

Posted about 2 years ago

StueysKid

Avatar for StueysKid

969 posts
Joined 11/2009

Definitely folding. The only value hand you're head of is like a NFD, and given his stats (readless) I don't think he'd be bluff check raising the turn very often even with a NFD

Range: 99, QHeart9Heart and even the one combo of 55. That's about it. I suppose there's a chance he could have another AQ in which case you're calling or raising here to chop. Not very good unless he's a spazz monkey IMO.

Posted about 2 years ago

a blind hippo

Avatar for a blind hippo

208 posts
Joined 10/2010

maaaagine his turn range was limited to the nuts...

Posted about 2 years ago

Farmer108

Avatar for Farmer108

293 posts
Joined 07/2010

As the pot was multiway pre, and he was on the BB, he could be calling with a lot of speculative hands, suited connectors and one gappers, and then donk out on the flop with a made hand or draw to protect their hand. His check raising the turn could be a 2 pair hand trying to take down the pot, scared of a club river, or a trips/boat hand raising for value.

On the turn I have stoved a range of QJs,QTs,J9s,J9o,T9s,T9o,98s,98o, A9s, A9o as hands that we beat, and counted a total of 46 combos that we beat. Against these hands we have 90% equity

As for a range of hands that beat us, I have counted 55,99,56s,54s,56o,54o,57s,57o,A5o,A5s
This makes it 36 combos of hands that beat us. Adding this to our above range, this gives us 55%equity.

If I've done the maths correctly, calling here would be +Ev by $3.87.

Including draws AJc through A2c our equity increases by 2%,making the call more profitable.

Again, assuming I've done the maths right, the EV on a shove here is +$5.07.

So, you could risk $2.50 to win $3.97, or $7 to win $5.07. I will opt for the 'call and act again on the river' line as opposed to a shove

(my shove EV was calculated assuming that he calls all hands that he raises, which is unlikely, but even so...)

Posted about 2 years ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

moneytize

Avatar for moneytize

55 posts
Joined 05/2009

hey linkwood! great series and i hope to take this video down Grin

on the turn decision, we either have to shove or fold and i like shoving.

first of all, i think if he had a nutted hand on flop, players tend to c/r a lot especially multiway vs a tight PFR. when he leads close to 2/3rds pot, i think he has a lot of TP type hands and a lot of draws.

as you pointed out, q9s only has 1 combo, 99 is 3 combos, and 55 is one combo. qq is almost never in his range imo. so basically, we are afraid of 4 or 5 combos and those combos only play this way a fraction of the time.

now when it comes to draws, there are a TON of combos in his range. i do think that draws tend to c/shove here as a semi-bluff for maximum fold equity so that is the only thing that concerns me. given that is is 10nl, there is a TON of spaz and random play that counteracts the few times he does have a monster.

also, not sure what level your opponent is on, but your turn range is very wide so he might be c/ring for value w/ Qx or he might be semibluffing with a draw because he knows you can have a wide range

i think you turned about the best turn card in the deck and you need to jam for value since he will call off w/ draws and worse Qx hands

Posted about 2 years ago

brus89

Avatar for brus89

80 posts
Joined 01/2010

ok i think he mostly had here 99 becouse i do not see him doing that with other hand might have aq too but he might squeeze pre, if he was leading with f/d on flop i think he will lead the turn as well, with kq he will chek call or lead again so i will fold becouse my potential is to chop or loose and im ok to loose 3 doll. is correct?

Posted about 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMicro Stakes Online NL → DC Shorts : Linkwood (#5) - Micro-stakes Part 4