erby
182 posts
Joined 01/2009
Poker_Road
1225 posts
Joined 11/2009
erby
182 posts
Joined 01/2009
Poker_Road
1225 posts
Joined 11/2009
Given this fish is likley to try get tricky and min raise or something with an 8 or AA I think we can call here.
Honestly Iv seen these monkeys do this with QQ .
Its just too likley he's giving us another present here =-)
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Wordup8801
29 posts
Joined 08/2009
I agree with Poker_Road, I'd call it off here given past history and expect to see a worse Ace or smaller pocket pair a lot. If the 59 hand had happened recently I'd be a little more hesitant but I'd still call it off as sometimes these huge overshoves turn into leveling wars. If the hand had happened more than a few orbits ago I think its a snap as he probably doesn't even remember you saw him do it.
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
erby
182 posts
Joined 01/2009
Yeah. Hand was like 2 orbits ago. How often do we think he's showing us a worse ace here? I figure it's either "highly likely" or "not at all". If he has something like AT or lower he's basically turning it into a bluff. Do we expect him to do that? I don't know what goes through these players minds, but I thought that this was either {T8,A8,78,89} or a bluff (i'm including pocket pairs JJ and lower in this range). Given our history I weighted his range towards junk and made the call. He showed 66 and my hand held up. I wasn't sure about my call after, because I think I snap fold this against a reg/any decent player. Thanks for the help guys.
Just for kicks, is anyone calling this vs. a decent player with no reads?
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Wordup8801
29 posts
Joined 08/2009
I agree if he's shoving a worse ace here he's turning it into a bluff, but he also probably doesn't know what that means, I think his range will be predominantly pocket pairs, but at least a few aces in there. Also, to consider calling against a decent player I'd need a great read or atleast an 8, without a good read im probably folding anything below T8 or J8. Good players almost never do this without the nuts though.
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Langerz
3965 posts
Joined 02/2007
In the original hand I couldn't fold and would expect to be ahead a lot.
Against a decent player without a better read than decent I'd probably fold. This would be a really weird line from anyone decent though. I'd assume our decent read was wrong when I saw it.
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
tubasteve
7697 posts
Joined 11/2007
Lann555
3000 posts
Joined 06/2008
Given read I'd be snapping this off, he is obviously clueless. I could fold this vs a really lose passive guy as they will show up with like 85o with this line and play Ax passive by just calling.
Not sure what I'd do vs a decent player, as decent players usually have no range for taking this line.
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
zenben
1270 posts
Joined 03/2009
I've seen some crazy stuff on paired boards-and most of it is spazzy bluffs. More than once I've seen players with stats like 35/0 take this line with QQ/KK that they "slowplayed" preflop. they don't realize they are turning their hand into a bluff here, they simply hope their hand is good and shove it in.
Posted almost 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
erby
182 posts
Joined 01/2009