Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by BalugaWhale (Mid Stakes)

The Baluga Show: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

The Baluga Show: Episode Four by BalugaWhale

BalugaWhale has more quiz questions for those who think they can solve it all.

About The Baluga Show Subscribe to

Each week BalugaWhale brings on a new DC member and quizzes them on a variety of 6max situations.

Tags

hand replayer ipod friendly balugawhale hh review the baluga show

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 61 minutes long
  • Posted 12 months ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for The Baluga Show: Episode Four

or track by Email or RSS


Finnisher

Avatar for Finnisher

167 posts
Joined 09/2009

Time Link to 00:06:44

This AQ spot is pretty interesting cos I think one of the mistakes uS/SSNL regs make is adjusting too fast and I think you've said it as well. Hero being ready to happily 3b/5b AQo kinda is that, OTOH villain might do the same and 4bet a bunch. But we don't know that and assuming it would be overadjusting Smile

Posted 12 months ago

nitville

Avatar for nitville

26 posts
Joined 03/2012

Hey whats up guys? I really like this series. Rusty thanks for fixing the sound on last weeks ep. This week when I try to steam this video. I'm only getting the 1st 2mins. I dl the ipod and windows links and both are working fine. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks again for all the work that goes into these vids and this site.

Posted 12 months ago

jaimestaples

Avatar for jaimestaples

1434 posts
Joined 08/2010

Thanks again for having me on Andrew. These concepts are really sinking in after re-watching today.

Posted 12 months ago

zankaa

Avatar for zankaa

688 posts
Joined 04/2008

Time Link to 00:15:39

Option D in this hand is really interesting, i take this line a decent amount and if you know your opponent you can in some cases b/c the river too. I dont see the raise on the turn as a pure bluff by any means, if you make the raise big enough that he cant call with his draws, but not much bigger than that, you will find that some players react really bad to a line like this, def recomended!

Posted 12 months ago

rohan68

Avatar for rohan68

653 posts
Joined 12/2008

Time Link to 00:06:01

hello
i would be pleased to have clues to play postflop a 4bet pot as a caller with AQo when we miss Top pair, it seems very hard with such a small pot to stack ratio, i never call a 4bet like most regs who either fold or push 100bb deep
have a nice day

Posted 12 months ago

rohan68

Avatar for rohan68

653 posts
Joined 12/2008

Time Link to 00:27:43

what is our calling range vs 3bet preflop oop? i believe it looks like TT-JJ AQs KQs, we seems very easy to read, don't wee?

Posted 12 months ago

rohan68

Avatar for rohan68

653 posts
Joined 12/2008

Time Link to 00:48:55

why dont the reg has flushdraws,?
if he's good he opens his range because fish will often call so he wants to play more pots with him so he should add hands who likes familly pot like Axs and suited connectors (that he won"t call without a fish being mp vs you utg
by the way, as already said great serie !

Posted 12 months ago

Some random guy

Avatar for Some random guy

31 posts
Joined 02/2011

Time Link to 00:38:13

Round 5. So, when we hit TPTK on the turn here and check, it is with the intention of check-folding to a bet from either player?

Posted 12 months ago

Some random guy

Avatar for Some random guy

31 posts
Joined 02/2011

why dont the reg has flushdraws,?
if he's good he opens his range because fish will often call so he wants to play more pots with him so he should add hands who likes familly pot like Axs and suited connectors (that he won"t call without a fish being mp vs you utg


He can't have an Axs-flushdraw because the ace is on the board. That leaves 5 suited connectors, 9h8h/8h7h/7h6h/6h5h/5h4h and they should probably be discounted, since it is quite possible that he will fold them in MP to an UTG-raise even with a loose-passive player in the blinds.

Posted 12 months ago

zachucsb

Avatar for zachucsb

6 posts
Joined 01/2008

Time Link to 00:51:32

You suggesting to check turn implies that on the flop we are only value betting vs the fish and if called by the reg we are behind his range. Thats seems a little overboard. I prefer betting turn for value against J9hh QJhh KJhh, also I think you might get looked up by AXs occasionally.
If he checked back AX on turn I would like a turn check more, but once we check turn he will likely and correctly so be betting any AX he peeled with on flop. He should be expecting us to be betting AT+ on turn and has an easy protection/value bet on turn when checked to. He occasionally value cuts himslef vs AT and AQ but thats it.

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Round 5. Is squeezing AJ vs a good aggressive UTG raise with a fish in the middle standard? Is this a bluff or value squeeze? While we clearly have value vs the fish, seems like UTG's range is too strong for this to be for value against him. At the same time, our hand is too strong to be turning into a bluff. The table dynamics (specifically UTG's likelihood of playing both strong and medium strength hands by calling) seem also to work against us.

Specifically, what hands are we expecting to UTG to call us with? Fold with?

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Round 6. We bet half pot with KK after flop and turn check throughs on board of Ac Qc 7c 3o Qo. Answer was that river bet is bad, because not much to get value from. But isn't his range (given the PF 4b call) pretty heavy with JJ/TT/99/88? Given he's passive, won't he call with these hands a lot?

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Round 8. Just want to add that the turn raise not only had the advantage of forcing him to fold equity, but also prevents what will in many cases be a profitable river bluff.

I wonder if this might even be an example of the preemptive bet (bet being a raise in this case) as discussed in Mathematics of Poker (p170).

I was curious also how you work this concept into your updated reasons for betting framework from Easy Game, where we have the broader and more correct definitions of value bet and bluff as the only possible reasons for betting. Does the concept of the preemptive bet throw a slight wrench in that, or do you work it in somehow?

Thanks, and this is my favorite DC series so far btw

Posted 12 months ago

StackHunter

Avatar for StackHunter

2648 posts
Joined 09/2010

Round 8
I'd like to add one more reason not to call the river or to raise the turn:
- he can turn into a bluff hands that actually beat us (like 9x, 6x, 77-88)

I also really like this series.

Posted 12 months ago




HomePoker ForumsMicro Stakes Online NL → The Baluga Show : Episode Four