nut flush on paired board

Subscribe to nut flush on paired board 6 posts, 5 voices

 
drsmooth
Pair of Deuces
190 posts
Joined 07/08

Villain is a nit. 12/5/5. No other reads.

Poker Stars $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter

SB: $24.75
BB: $42.10
UTG: $17.95
MP: $24.95
CO: $33.85
Hero (BTN): $24.90

Pre Flop: ($0.35) Hero is BTN with A 7
3 folds, Hero raises to $0.70, 1 fold, BB calls $0.45

Flop: ($1.50) 2 9 9 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $1, BB calls $1

Turn: ($3.50) 8 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2.50, BB raises to $5, Hero calls $2.50

River: ($13.50) K (2 players)
BB bets $34.75

Posted Sep 8, 2008 5:55am

WhiteHeatSYD
Deuces Full
516 posts
Joined 09/07

Over how many hands is your sample? I can’t see much that he calls with such a tight range. It could be exactly 88 or 22, which sucks if it is. You need to careful using his aggression factor as his range is so tight pf, that he is going to be in good shape post flop which will distort this. His river bet looks like he wants a call, and has got tricky. But I think that a worst flush is more likely than a Fullhouse imo. It is a difficult spot, but you only need to be good 25% of the time to turn a profit.

Posted Sep 8, 2008 6:32am

greenzulu
Deuce High
19 posts
Joined 08/08

he overbet shoves the river Syd:

BB bets $34.75

Gross spot, not the worst place to fold.

From the coaching tree vid:
Baluga Whale:

People are not bluffing as much as you think they are
-when there is someone who is going to bluff you will know

hard to imagine him making this move without a FH unless it is something that he is capable of.

Posted Sep 8, 2008 8:44am

gring000h
Deuces Full
677 posts
Joined 03/08

as played, river looks like a fold

Posted Sep 8, 2008 8:27pm

tubasteve
Quad Deuces
2063 posts
Joined 11/07

also from a future coaching tree episode: "people are generally incapable of overbet bluffing on the river"

spoiler!

Posted Sep 8, 2008 8:29pm

drsmooth
Pair of Deuces
190 posts
Joined 07/08

That is the conclusion I came to after the hand. I snap called and got show a full house. A little later I found myself in a similar situation.

Poker Stars $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter

MP: $74.15
CO: $26.55
Hero (BTN): $25.95
SB: $27.65
BB: $41.45
UTG: $15.15

Pre Flop: ($0.35) Hero is BTN with A 6
3 folds, Hero raises to $0.70, SB calls $0.60, 1 fold

Flop: ($1.65) 2 8 7 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $1.25, SB raises to $3.50, Hero calls $2.25

Turn: ($8.65) J (2 players)
SB bets $7.75, Hero calls $7.75

River: ($24.15) 7 (2 players)
SB bets $14.25, Hero calls $14 all in

Final Pot: $52.15
Hero shows A 6 (a flush, Ace high)
SB shows J A (two pair, Jacks and Sevens)
Hero wins $49.60
(Rake: $2.55)


This time I got shown TPTK and I take it down. This play was quite passive also.

Maybe we're making assumptions about what certain players actually consider a bluff? Maybe in the first hand a lot of people would think that overbetting a flush could e for value reasoning trips might call? But not this particular player, obviously. So do you all think thi is a standard fold or more read dependent?

Posted Sep 8, 2008 11:45pm