Guest Video - tubasteve $200NL - 12/21/07 Page 1 of 2
This thread discusses the Content article: Guest Video - tubasteve $200NL - 12/21/07
Steve is back and mixing it up once again by playing loose-aggressive at a $200NL 6-max table on FTP. Steve is looking to improve his video making skills so please add your comments here! (let him have it!:woohoo:)
I loved this video as he builds a loose image which puts him in some tight spots that make for interesting hands.
Regarding the hand where you stacked off with 88. I get how an observant player playing 1-2 might be looking for an opportunity to make a play at you, and may notice that he hasn\'t made one at you yet during a given session. But a guy playing 4+ tables, is he thinking that way? Maybe it\'s because I don\'t multi-table well, but it struck me as an odd place to make a stand; OOP against the tough player in a good game.
I\'m wondering if you\'ve firmed up in your mind since making the video if you thought it was a good or bad play.
Hi ChicagoTroy,
Upon reflection, I do think it was probably a little too loose of a spot. My opponent\'s checkraise flop % was fairly low, which I didn\'t take into account in the video. Regarding the number of tables he is playing, if he is a solid regular (which I perceived him to be) then he will definitely be looking to take a stand at some point.
FTP 1/2 is full of good TAGs that multitable quite well. Another reason I chose to take a stand is to protect myself from getting bluffed later in the session and in later sessions versus that player. I don\'t mind stacking off to a regular even when there are fish at the table since I can just reload and keep playing the fish. It might seem silly, but there are more metagame considerations even at 1/2 NL than most players might think.
Any other questions about the video? :)
-Steve
hi Steve...
1)I have to ask....do you play the tuba?
2) you say \"uhmmmm\" while your thinking a lot...
3) there was a couple of interesting hands between other players....it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on their possible hand ranges/ plays/bet sizes/etc. real time....for a future read and learning..
4)I am hoping to play more cash game NL in the future, but I have my hands full with limit and some nl mtt and sng\'s.
I noticed a lot of mini-raising of c-bets.
Is this when the \"real play of the hand\" begins?
ex..normal seems raise/call c-bet/fold...
What does this min-raise mean? can we use it ourselves for some purpose?
As much info as you can give me on this min-raise is helpful...ty.
5) A couple of times you decided to \"stack off\".
at the time of this decision, are you merely looking for the proper/best way to get the rest of the chips in....or is that too simplistic?
6) stats....
I have learned here that stats can be misleading...they tell us how often he plays...and how often he raises...but it doesnt tell us which cards he is doing what with. or IF HE IS ANY GOOD..
24/16 is not a limit player we would like to play against. but lots of these players have exploitable weaknesses.(like folding too much)
my question is....since deception is of higher value in NL. Couldn\'t a player with 50/20 or 35/12....be just as, if not more dangerous than a 18/15 (multi-tabler...no imagination) player??
7) NL big bet poker, is about a big bet. you mentioned that picking up the small pots is worth paying attention to, I agree.
when we make a big bet....we are attempting to
A) get opp to fold (we bluff)
B) get opp to call (we have it)
Is a good begginner strategy to \"have it\" most of the time....or until caught? or ??
I got more but I dont wanna piss you off right away.. ...lol....
I like your videos....keep them coming....ty
Ok, I\'ll try to tackle these as best I can without taking an hour. :)
1) Yes, since I was in the 6th grade. I\'m a college senior now so that\'s over 10 years.
2) I know, I\'m working on it.
3) I can definitely do that in the future. I agree that it would be very useful. Generally I try to make notes on plays I\'m not involved in but I think during the course of these vids I\'ve been too busy trying to discuss other points. There is definitely some dead time that I can try to use better.
4) Minraising means a lot of different things depending on the opponent. Often it is more important to pay attention to the frequency at which an opponent minraises rather than the fact that they are just doing it. When I minraise, it is generally with the intentions of tricking my opponent into reraising me, but I will also use it against unimaginative players that will often fold. Also, like in limit we can sometimes minraise the turn in order to get a free showdown, especially if our opponent is bad and won\'t pick up on our strategy.
5) You pretty much nailed it. If I decide to \"stack off\", it means I\'m either a) willing or b) eager to get all my money in at some point during the hand.
6) I use a lot of stats besides VPIP and PFR (the two you mentioned) when I am at the tables. Generally after a few rounds at the table you should be able to tell if a player is decent or not regardless of his stats. Like they say in Rounders, if you can\'t spot the fish in your first half hour at the table, you are the fish. ;) To answer your last question, you are correct that a 35/12 or 50/20 could be more difficult to play against than an 18/15, but generally they will still be more profitable to play since they have more glaring weaknesses and more holes in their games to exploit.
7) Don\'t get trapped into the mantras you might read in crappy NL books you find in the stores. Stealing the blinds and small pots is CRUCIAL to improving your winrate in NLHE. When we make a big bet, we have to think about what we want to accomplish, and what we expect our opponent to do. If villain is tight and unimaginative, then we might make a big bet as a bluff. If he is a thinking player, we might make a big bet trying to get paid off, tricking him into thinking we are bluffing. It really just depends, like anything else in poker. It also depends what you mean by a big bet; as a general rule of thumb unless you are trying to induce some weird behavior out of an opponent, all of your bets should bet at least 1/2 pot, and generally between 2/3 and 3/4 pot. And to answer your last question, you shouldn\'t be thinking about poker in terms of \"usually\" and specific strategies. Just try to identify profitable situations, and you will win lots of money. Of course there is a standard line for most situations, but when you\'re at the tables you shouldn\'t just do something because it is standard. You should do it because it will make you money. :)
Feel free to fire away with the rest of your questions; DC is payin\' me the big bucks to answer them!
I have to say that I thought the 88 hand was not just light, it was bad. The problem is that his range is slanted towards hands that are flipping (overs with flush draws) and hands that have you crushed if you get it in. If he has a bare 6 or 7, or a smaller pair he isn\'t going to get it in.
Cephus lives really isn\'t the kind of LAGTAG in the NL200 game that I would stack off light to. He plays fairly tight and straight forward in my memory, and his c/r on that flop is usually a pretty big hand since he is making it OOP and has to make a big raise on the flop. Plus that board hits a lot of his CC range in the SB since I\'m guessing he CC most mid pairs (44-99) as well as maybe JTs or KQs type hands.
it is just a really really bad RIO situation imo.
Another thing I disagree with is your comment that you would iso a bad fish with J6s. I love iso\'ing the fish with a lot of hands, but J6s is just trash to be raising with pf. 65s or A5s sure. QJo sure. JTs sure. but J6s is just bad. your pair hands are tough to extract value because you are either making second or third pair or have a horrible kicker, if you have a flush you are unlikely to get action and if you do they often have a better flush, and you have no way to make a straight. Especially with a fish that seem reluctant to fold to flop c-bets. I would rather squeeze or 3-bet bluff pf with that hand against the TAGs than iso a LP fish that like to peel a lot and plays back.
I did like your point about CC hands like 89s when you could start a series of calls preflop with decent position and a good multiway hand. That would work well with Cephus Lives acting behind you because he won\'t try to squeeze too much. Against some of the more LAGTAG regs in the NL200 game (myself included) you would be getting squeezed pretty often there.
watching the second half now. I\'ll add more comments when if I have some.
another comment: I think you need to raise a little more when iso\'ing tumadre with the other LP fish in the BB. Nikigotballs is CC\'ing your raise in the BB a lot, but if you raised to 10 or 11 pf I think you would get the pot HU with position more often.
And I think you need to c-bet a little bit larger amounts. I think a 4/5s type c-bet tends to get played back at a little less, and the investment creates greater fold equity in situations where you typically have to fold if you get played back at on the flop. Basically it is worth putting in an extra 2-5 dollars on your c-bet if it gives you a 10-20% better chance to win the pot. Also when you do flop a hand and can stand the heat you\'ll create a bigger pot and be more likely to get it in as a big favorite if they try to make a play with a draw.
I just think that you need make slightly largers bets and raises when trying to play LAGGY since you are provoking players to play back at you with your loose play.
FWIW I understand that you ran fairly bad in this video, and I haven\'t seen any bad play other than the 88 hand which was kinda bad, but obviously not horrible.
mightyjim, there are plenty of situations where its profitable to isolate with any 2 if the right factors are present etc. etc. I definitely wouldn\'t say never iso with J6s though of course the hands you mention would be more ideal.
-DeathDonkey
but against a LP that is peeling a ton and playing back at us I just don\'t think we have a big enough postflop edge to be iso-raising with J6s.
I\'m fine with iso-raising LPs that limp-call pf and then play fit or fold every flop with an even wider range, but this guy was a little more active postflop. Plus we had two LPs in the blinds that were likely to CC which means we could easily end up playing J6s in a 3-way pot where a c-bet costs us at least $15 and we basically have a crap hand.
I play pretty LAGGY (usually around 26/20 pf) and I would pitch this right away. I guess I could definitely be wrong about this, but I just feel like we are going to be able to find a lot better spots to pick on this guy than the J6.
Given that detailed info on his postflop play I tend to agree with you, that J6s seems a bit below a hand I\'d want to iso with there. Hopefully tubasteve can add his thoughts on that one.
btw a few nights ago I 4 tabled 100 NL for fun / practice and ended up being 36/31 pre. Guess that\'s a little passed LAGgy? I crushed of course. :)
-DeathDonkey
when I\'m 4-tabling I actually find myself playing with very similar preflop numbers. I think if you are paying attention and you have a table of players that will fold, playing somewhere between 40/35 and 30/20 is optimal. There are just so many dead money spots, most multi-tabling TAGs faily to adjust to your pf range quickly enough, and you can easily make up for losing some money with loose pf raises and c-bets when you get paid off (which will happen).
I was 4-tabling NL400 last night on FTP and was playing about 33/27 for almost 400 hands and had a very nice win. I find that I\'ve had to scale back to around 26/19 or so when I am playing more than 4 tables, or when I realize that I\'ve played several thousand hands with some of the regs and they\'ve begun to adjust. If you don\'t scale it back some the decent regs really start to 3-bet you super light whenever they have position.
But obviously if you are paying attention you can just shift gears again and stay ahead of them. I think playing superLAG and playing 4 tables gives you a definite edge in the games on FTP since there are so many TAG regs that grind at all of the tables. But I only have about 30k hands of experience, so my opinion definitely might change if I hit a big downswing or something :p
I think you are right now about the 88 hand, in the heat of the moment I made the wrong decision. I\'ve played with that particular villain a decent amount since and despite our history he seems to still play me in a very straightforward manner. Live and learn I guess.
Regarding the J6s hand, I talked to some respected posters and they agreed with you that its too loose. Seems like about a J8s is the worst jack people are raising here typically, so thanks for helping me plug a leak of my own! I would still raise any suited king however since you have the chance to make a very high flush, and also hands like J9o, A2o, and Q8s.
Thanks for your comments, keep em comin!
Regarding c-bet size, I am pretty sure you are wrong as I have discussed this topic very heavily with many players in the past, and with my former coach BalugaWhale. Most of the time you c-bet you will have missed, so by keeping the bet size smaller you lose less money when you get played back at and your c-bet has to win the post a smaller % of the time. When you make the smaller c-bet and then have a hand you want to continue with on the turn, you then can make a larger turn bet to make up for the value you missed on the flop, allowing you to still easily get AI with your monster hands by the river.
interesting. I\'ll have to think about this more. I guess my comment was really based more on kind of random empirical thoughts (I don\'t think I can even say evidence). If you have some more to discuss about this I would definitely be interested. I guess I feel like sometimes I run up against people that won\'t play back when you make a pot sized bet, but a 2/3 bet seems to be open season. But this I definitely don\'t have enough evidence to back this up, and would love to hear more on the subject. We probably could break it down mathematically and figure out an easy solution, but obviously it would be dependent on several assumptions.
I know I am going to feel stupid when I find out the answer, but where do you go to download this video? I have not been able to find it anywhere!
