$50 HORSE SnG Joe Tall - 12/03/07

Subscribe to $50 HORSE SnG Joe Tall - 12/03/07 11 posts, 5 voices

 
Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
2093 posts
Joined 11/06

This thread discusses the Content article: $50 HORSE SnG Joe Tall - 12/03/07

Well, it was suggested and I thought it was a great idea so I jumped in and found one. Quick note, the video is cut off at the end, my internet connection dropped! :angry: I had to shut down all, restart everything, and by the time I got everything back to normal, I was in 4th place and short stacked, and lasted one hand! I bubbled again! :blush:

I give a crash course on other games in this vid, some limit-trny strategy and add a very important meta-game concept.

Please add your thoughts here. Hope you enjoy the video!

Posted Dec 5, 2007 12:44am

Boomer
Set of Deuces
329 posts
Joined 06/07

Never mind, sorted, didn\'t read the OP :unsure:

Love the HORSE vids Joe, keep \'em comin\'. Sorry about another bubble

Boomer

Posted Dec 6, 2007 1:50am

themightyjim2k
Set of Deuces
340 posts
Joined 04/07

about 25:30 in you play a hand of StudHL and you limp behind one guy in late position with the A79 all hearts with the 9 showing. You mention that the other limper is most certainly playing for the high with the 9 showing.

on 4th st. you catch an off suit 2, the limper gets an off suit A, and the bring catches a Q. You fold to the other limpers bet, obviously a pretty reasonable play. However since the bring hit a total brick for a low draw, and you think the other player is going high, is there any merit to taking one off and trying to hit either a good low draw or a 4th heart on 5th street. I know you don\'t want to make too many loose calls on 4th st, but based on the hands you expect your opponents to be holding I would think you should still have some equity going both ways.

just wondering. I\'m a total stud8 noob (read about half of ray zees book and the chapter in SS2) but I\'m trying to pick up anything I can.

Posted Dec 6, 2007 6:16pm

Nfinity
Deuce High
61 posts
Joined 03/07

themightyjim2k wrote:

about 25:30 in you play a hand of StudHL and you limp behind one guy in late position with the A79 all hearts with the 9 showing. You mention that the other limper is most certainly playing for the high with the 9 showing.

on 4th st. you catch an off suit 2, the limper gets an off suit A, and the bring catches a Q. You fold to the other limpers bet, obviously a pretty reasonable play. However since the bring hit a total brick for a low draw, and you think the other player is going high, is there any merit to taking one off and trying to hit either a good low draw or a 4th heart on 5th street. I know you don\'t want to make too many loose calls on 4th st, but based on the hands you expect your opponents to be holding I would think you should still have some equity going both ways.

just wondering. I\'m a total stud8 noob (read about half of ray zees book and the chapter in SS2) but I\'m trying to pick up anything I can.



JT mentions why calling there is bad but doesn\'t go too much into detail.

1) The pot is minute, ESPECIALLY for a HI/LO pot 3-way.

2) Our draw is very poor. We are drawing to half the pot, no more really. The open Limper makes an Ace on 4th improving his hand and leaving us with less outs for high. We currently have a 3 card draw both ways, and our high draw is awful.

3) Our position is terrible.The bring still currently has a random hand so we have absolutely no idea if the Q was a brick or not, which means there is a chance we are stuck in the middle of 2 players with currently the worst hand. Not a good position in Stud HI/LO

4) Our hand is an open book to our opponents. This is what JT was talking about. Our opponents will be able to play perfectly against us on all streets up to the River regardless of how we improve.

Think about what happens when we improve somehow. Let\'s say we improve our High Draw on 5th, Say we spike an A or an open pair of 9\'s. Depending on how our opponents\' boards come together, there is a high likelihood of us being first to act if we improve with any chance of having the best hand. Our opponents will have position on us, and almost complete knowledge of our hand. Open 9\'s would be the worst, but spiking an A wouldn\'t be much better.

Now say we improve our Low draw. Our opponent(s) will know we don\'t have a made low yet because of the open 9, as opposed to if we had the 7 up like JT was talking about. In the latter case there is some doubt in our opponents mind as to what we have, and we can possibly take advantage of that by getting free cards or folding a better hand. We get no such advantages with our hand laid out the way it is.

In this situation we are hoping for a perfect card, a Low Heart to hit our board, Even then we are committed to calling down on the 2 Big streets praying for a scoop in this tiny pot.


BTW JT I don\'t like the limp behind here. I understand why it was your goto play. If you had any kind of read at all you would have been able to accurately make the better play (Raise or Fold) but I think if (A7hh)9h is too good of a hand to pass up VS. an unknown CO Open Limper, then I suggest a Raise.

Raising would have eliminated many of the problems you had on 4th. In your situation, even when you improved(sort of) you were still put to a difficult decision when the 3rd player was present and you didn\'t have initiative.

Posted Dec 6, 2007 8:31pm

themightyjim2k
Set of Deuces
340 posts
Joined 04/07

thanks for the response. That is what I figured I would here from JT as well. I was thinking in the video that the hand might be better if you popped the limper on 3rd st. Since it is unlikely that the bring has much of a hand since he didn\'t open complete.

also nfinity if you ever feel like posting a stud8 hand on here that would be sweet. I know I couldn\'t give any advice, but I figure JT and a few others might want to discuss it, and I could pick something up in the discussion.

thanks again.

Posted Dec 7, 2007 2:31am

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
2093 posts
Joined 11/06

FWIW, you answer the question perfectly. Great analysis. I can only hope that you got such a great answer from watching my vids! I would take 10% credit! Well done!


On to your question:

Nfinity wrote:


BTW JT I don\'t like the limp behind here. I understand why it was your goto play. If you had any kind of read at all you would have been able to accurately make the better play (Raise or Fold) but I think if (A7hh)9h is too good of a hand to pass up VS. an unknown CO Open Limper, then I suggest a Raise.

Raising would have eliminated many of the problems you had on 4th. In your situation, even when you improved(sort of) you were still put to a difficult decision when the 3rd player was present and you didn\'t have initiative.



There one obvious reason I didnt raise 3rd, and you say it here for the most part:

Our hand is an open book to our opponents. This is what JT was talking about. Our opponents will be able to play perfectly against us on all streets up to the River regardless of how we improve.



There is a few more, that I didnt get into.

1. By raising on 3rd, if I fail to get it HU, it\'s a disaster, as it\'s obv I have a high hand, and I have be fairly lucky to dodge the bring-ins possible low. W/O going back to see the dead cards, I think there were a lot of high-hands that folded so the bring has a higher probability that he has a low.

2. I re-open the betting. Its obv the bring is up against 2 high hands and he should be re-raising all sorts of gutter-razz-hands, and o/c premium low draw. I would re-raise a hand like 643r here, etc. and you should to if you were the bring.

3. It bloats the pot. Regardless of what I hit on 4th, my opponents have all the right in the world to now call correctly in a bigger pot. Even a missed 3-low cold peel lightly and be about break-even to positive with implied odds against two highs.

Hope this helps,
Joe Tall

Posted Dec 7, 2007 6:21am

Nfinity
Deuce High
61 posts
Joined 03/07

FWIW, you answer the question perfectly. Great analysis. I can only hope that you got such a great answer from watching my vids! I would take 10% credit! Well done!



Well, I don\'t own Ray Zee\'s Split book (a crime, I\'m sure), and I never played a serious hand of Stud8 before Deucescracked came online, so feel free to take a little more than 10% credit.

As for the pre-flop raise, I thought about it a little bit before I saw your response, and had already came to a similar conclusion, albeit for different but related reasons.

My initial response was grounded in Hold\'Em strategy, where in the SB facing a Button open-limp, you almost always prefer raising over completing with any hand you wish to play.

This really doesn\'t fit in a game where not all your cards are completely hidden and your position in the betting can vary street to street.

Posted Dec 7, 2007 12:45pm

Nfinity
Deuce High
61 posts
Joined 03/07

Since it is unlikely that the bring has much of a hand since he didn\'t open complete.



You really won\'t find a lot of people open-completing on the Bring, and you shouldn\'t be doing it too often in a full-ring(I don\'t think:blink: )

Open-Completing on the Bring doesn\'t improve your odds greatly when you call a raise either way, and I certainly don\'t think it\'s worth what you give up by advertising the value of your hand in such an obvious manner.

Posted Dec 7, 2007 12:53pm

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
2093 posts
Joined 11/06

Nfinity wrote:

Since it is unlikely that the bring has much of a hand since he didn\'t open complete.



You really won\'t find a lot of people open-completing on the Bring, and you shouldn\'t be doing it too often in a full-ring(I don\'t think:blink: )

Open-Completing on the Bring doesn\'t improve your odds greatly when you call a raise either way, and I certainly don\'t think it\'s worth what you give up by advertising the value of your hand in such an obvious manner.



Unless your playign HUHU, there is no reason, IMO (and many well known Stud players I\'ve talked to) to ever open complete. Plus, bring-in-re-raising is FUN!:woohoo:

Posted Dec 7, 2007 1:07pm

themightyjim2k
Set of Deuces
340 posts
Joined 04/07

see I learn something new in the same thread. sweet.

Posted Dec 7, 2007 9:04pm

yeah thats me
Deuce High
69 posts
Joined 06/08

I'm trying to find this, but having no luck. Anyone care to help direct me?

I've filtered Joe Tall and also MTT/S&G, as well as checked the articles(described as content article).

Posted Sep 18, 2008 12:05am