Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by BigBadBabar (Micro/Small Stakes)

Micro Meadows: Episode Three

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Micro Meadows: Episode Three by BigBadBabar

BigBadBabar continues with 2 tables of small-stakes LHE and discusses the move up in stakes and his opponents.

About Micro Meadows Subscribe to

Despite the saying, everyone's not solid - at least not at LHE micros! Follow along with BBB as we cover general trends, common opponent types, and typical mistakes you'll see in today's games. The series will be mostly live play along with some theory discussion.

Tags

bigbadbabar micro meadows lhe micro-stakes cake network $0.25/0.5 $0.5/1

Video Details

  • Game: lhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 65 minutes long
  • Posted almost 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Micro Meadows: Episode Three

or track by Email or RSS


Fantam

Avatar for Fantam

88 posts
Joined 10/2007

Thankyou for your responses, and mentioning the table conditions which you consider when making playing decisions makes a lot of sense and is useful.

This is a very good series which you are making, and I look forward to the next installment.

Posted almost 2 years ago

Pid Koker

Avatar for Pid Koker

71 posts
Joined 02/2010

Time Link to 00:08:15

You know it's going to be a good day when you're to the left of the guy who posts in a 6-max game then proceeds to buy 400BB two minutes later.

Posted over 1 year ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4433 posts
Joined 03/2007

You know it's going to be a good day when you're to the left of the guy who posts in a 6-max game then proceeds to buy 400BB two minutes later.



there are a couple folks on there who will engage in buy-in wars with you

Posted over 1 year ago

Nuggle

Avatar for Nuggle

7 posts
Joined 11/2007

Time Link to 01:00:19

You talk about why you played passivley in the 2 previous hands and then when some other player did it you critisied it. I can't really see the distinction between his play and yours. You 3 bet from the BB and he calls then you barrell each street for value. If the other player has picked up on your aggression then I think he plays it well. He's not getting value from raising you apart from thae one specific hand that you had,

The only thing I can think of is that he had a much stronger hand than you had in either of the other 2 hands.

Posted over 1 year ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4433 posts
Joined 03/2007

You talk about why you played passivley in the 2 previous hands and then when some other player did it you critisied it. I can't really see the distinction between his play and yours. You 3 bet from the BB and he calls then you barrell each street for value. If the other player has picked up on your aggression then I think he plays it well. He's not getting value from raising you apart from thae one specific hand that you had,

The only thing I can think of is that he had a much stronger hand than you had in either of the other 2 hands.



yeah, i 3bet in position and then bet every street for value when checked to

i'm not criticizing passive play in general. in general i think we should decide what play to make based on how our hand is doing vs the opponent's range. lots of times that will mean passive play is best (or aggressive, or folding, or whatever). for example in the previous hand i have second pair in a 3bet pot -- basically a wa/wb situation. my hand is okay but the guy's 3betting range is reasonably strong and it's hard to see how i would get more value from a worse hand (or lose less vs a better hand) by taking a different line. in the 88 vs 99 hand, when both players flop overpairs in a 3bet-pot-blind battle, it's normal to expect that more action is going to go in. just thinking about ranges here, i'm 3betting preflop with lots of stuff, like overcards, that he can get value from either on the flop or the turn.

and yeah, like you said, his hand relative to my range is much stronger here than in the two previous hand examples. so that's why i thought he could have gotten some more value for his hand.

Posted over 1 year ago

Nuggle

Avatar for Nuggle

7 posts
Joined 11/2007

Ahh now that make sense. His passive play in that hand against your 3 betting range, which includes overs leaves him to make tougher decisions on later streets if a,k or q hit.

Thanks for the update.

Posted over 1 year ago

predrag

Avatar for predrag

23 posts
Joined 05/2010

Time Link to 00:55:55

Just to correct, in this hand (A8 on 989 flop) you don't have the opponent reverse dominated if he holds a higher A, because of the 99 on the board. So this could be another reason for the passive line, but I'd think it is more of a reason to protect your hand and raise.

Posted 10 months ago

predrag

Avatar for predrag

23 posts
Joined 05/2010

Time Link to 01:02:09

Hey BBB, sorry to keep harping on small mistakes of your old episodes here. I have just finally gained access to videos at DC, and am enjoying myself thoroughly - THANK YOU!

This correction actually makes the hand more interesting. Basically, on the K7QAJ board all aces split (except 2 pair ones). Which maybe makes him feel improved with A2, although of course no weaker hand should have called him.... Grin

Posted 10 months ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4433 posts
Joined 03/2007

Just to correct, in this hand (A8 on 989 flop) you don't have the opponent reverse dominated if he holds a higher A, because of the 99 on the board. So this could be another reason for the passive line, but I'd think it is more of a reason to protect your hand and raise.



good catch, thanks. board reading fail imo. i think my hand is strong enough to raise a lot of turn cards and this is a safe one.

Posted 10 months ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4433 posts
Joined 03/2007

Hey BBB, sorry to keep harping on small mistakes of your old episodes here. I have just finally gained access to videos at DC, and am enjoying myself thoroughly - THANK YOU!

This correction actually makes the hand more interesting. Basically, on the K7QAJ board all aces split (except 2 pair ones). Which maybe makes him feel improved with A2, although of course no weaker hand should have called him.... Grin



looking at it now, that call makes me cringe. and you're right again. maybe part of the reason i "ran poorly" during this series was that i temporarily lost some of my knowledge of the rules of poker

Posted 10 months ago




HomePoker ForumsBeginner Limit Hold'em → Micro Meadows : Episode Three