Example: People came over a few times from Europe to try and start a new land in what we now call the USA. This failed several times. The first people came for business and they all died off. The first people who came to be able to believe in God the way they wanted made it. To me this yet another subtle example of how he is there.
You commit a number of logical fallacies with this argument. The major one being cum hoc ergo propter hoc: correlation does not imply causation: a faulty assumption that correlation between two variables implies that one causes the other. Just because the people who 'made it' believed in your god doesn't mean the reason they made it was because they believed in your god.
You also seem to cherry pick. If am good at poker whereas some Christians are not does that mean that atheism is more likely true? Clearly not.
Example: Why is it that the US military refuses to study how well the Israeli army as faired in impossible fights. They have had either the most amazing luck OR God has been looking out for his chosen people. You will say it was luck and over blown, I will say it was God looking out for them.
Another logical fallacy. A number of factors contributed to the Israeli victories over their Arab neighbors. Would you claim that the Nazis early victories over clearly superior neighbors meant that 'God was on their side?' Get real.
Example: The Bible speaks of how the Jewish people would be without their land and then would get it back before it happened. How do you explain away that? I'm and 100% sure you will TRY.
The passages in Ezekiel Jeremiah and Isaiah describing the then 'babylonian enslavement' (which was happening at the time) do predict a return to the 'promised land.' But so what? What would you expect them to say, that Israel is to be abandoned and forgotten? And just because it actually happened 2500 years later doesn't mean anything. If they had not returned by your reasoning that would be negative evidence that the 'prophecy' was true. Guess what? Jesus hasn't returned yet. I guess the prophecy is false!
The Golden rule is not in the Bible btw.
Therefore, whatever you want people to do for you, do the same for them
There is no proof at all of evolution and yet many people believe that on blind faith and then say a Christian is a blind moron for believing things that have no proof and then turn around and ignore the signs that he is indeed there.
There is a ton of evidence for evolution. DNA evidence (chromosome 2 is really ridiculously shocking evidence):
All members of Hominidae except humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Humans have only 23 pairs of chromosomes. Human chromosome 2 is widely accepted to be a result of an end-to-end fusion of two ancestral chromosomes.
Fusion of ancestral chromosomes left distinctive remnants of telomeres, and a vestigial centromere
The evidence for this includes:
* The correspondence of chromosome 2 to two ape chromosomes. The closest human relative, the chimpanzee, has near-identical DNA sequences to human chromosome 2, but they are found in two separate chromosomes. The same is true of the more distant gorilla and orangutan.
* The presence of a vestigial centromere. Normally a chromosome has just one centromere, but in chromosome 2 there are remnants of a second centromere.
* The presence of vestigial telomeres. These are normally found only at the ends of a chromosome, but in chromosome 2 there are additional telomere sequences in the middle.
Some argue that chromosome 2 presents very strong evidence in favour of the common descent of humans and other apes. According to researcher J. W. IJdo, "We conclude that the locus cloned in cosmids c8.1 and c29B is the relic of an ancient telomere-telomere fusion and marks the point at which two ancestral ape chromosomes fused to give rise to human chromosome 2.
Among others are paleontological evidence, geological evidence, skeletal evidence, cellular evidence etc. There is tons of information on it readily available but I assume that it's boring for you and you won't accept it because holding on to your faith is more important than seeking the truth. Don't claim to be open minded or the 'same' as everyone not holding your beliefs because that's clearly unture. You are obviously both willfully ignorant and uninterested in having a rational conversation. This, and not the misclaim that God is real, is the main reason that religion continues to thrive. It seeks to shut down the questioning aspect of its' followers minds.
I will also add this. If I am wrong then what did I lose? If you are wrong (athiest) what will you lose? Not looking for a reply in here I would just ask you to think about this for a while some day waiting for a plane or at a traffic light. I ask this because I care for all people and do not need the other side to come over to mine to feel better about it, which I don't think is so true for the athiest camp.
Ahh Pascal's Wager. Yawn.