tHeBoYmUsTdIe
1530 posts
Joined 01/2010
ad hominem, just saying...
"What things a man must learn in order to be able to apply the art of disputation, has been accurately shown by our philosophers; but with respect to the proper use of the things, we are entirely without practice. Only give to any of us, whom you please, an illiterate man to discuss with,, and he cannot discover how to deal with the man. But when he has moved the man a little, if he answers beside the purpose, he does not know how to treat him, but he then either abuses or ridicules him, and says, "He is an illiterate man; it is not possible to do anything with him." Now a guide, when he has found a man out of the road leads him into the right way: he does not ridicule or abuse him and then leave him. Do you also show this illiterate man the truth, and you will see that he follows. But so long as you do not show him the truth, do not ridicule him, but rather feel your own incapacity."
The Discourses By Epictetus, Book 2 Chapter 12
It's not an ad hominem at all. I'm not ridiculing or criticizing, or trying to bring them down personally in order to make my point more convincing. I'm just pointing out a fact.
It's impossible to give someone complicated directions in a language that's foreign to them. No matter how simply put, or how many times you reiterate it, they can't understand and can't be expected to understand. That's not a personal blow, it's just common sense.
Epictetus assumes the fact it is even possible for the illiterate man to understand or that he desires the truth in the first place. I discount that. The people in this thread either can't understand or don't want to understand so it becomes pointless to argue with them. The conversation is over before it even begins.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
tHeBoYmUsTdIe
1530 posts
Joined 01/2010
@mastertex
There are answers to every single one of your questions and they are readily available and easy to understand.
It is my contention that you do not wish to understand. You raise questions as if questions could somehow weaken a position, but then you choose not to go out of your way to find answers to them. You don't really want answers to your questions, because you know deep down that those answers would make your faith untenable. You're happy just knowing that there are unanswered questions, and that those somehow make your faith justified. God-did-it.
You are free to do as you wish, but what would be truly amazing to me is for you to go yet another step and claim that willfully taking such an unmovable position is both reasonable and justified, when just about everyone in this thread can see it for what it really is.
Can't you see that God was once used as the explanation for everything we did not understand? God used to be responsible for lightning and hurricanes and earthquakes...and now we know that isn't true. You sincerely believe we won't find the explanations for what you claim must be god at sometime in the future? I'll bet you any amount that we do. I'm so sure I'm willing to bet my life on it.
Hell, if I had one, I'd bet my soul on it.
But I'm sure this post will end up being just another exercise in frustration so, kindly, I bid you adieu and peace be with you as well.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
maglame
1015 posts
Joined 04/2010
First Law of Thermodynamics. This law (note: not a theory but a scientific law) teaches us that matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
Well the universe is in essence nothing... It has zero net energy and matter. There was never any energy created, because the universe has no energy. Or rather, there was never any "free" energy. It came at a cost, leaving the universe with a net total of zero energy.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Peesocake
948 posts
Joined 02/2007
Peesocake
948 posts
Joined 02/2007
Can't you see that God was once used as the explanation for everything we did not understand? God used to be responsible for lightning and hurricanes and earthquakes...and now we know that isn't true.
We know more about the processes. Great. We know more about the mechanics of this universe. Yay.
Don't get me wrong, it's a big achievement. Science is very powerful. It's brought good, it's brought bad. It's made life easier, it's made life tougher.
But it cannot account for the magic I witness in life. The manifestation of my consciousness, the joy of getting together, the love you may feel, incredible encounters one may have etc..
You could also ask the question: does chance exist? Atheists will say yes. The others will say no.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
SCS
6246 posts
Joined 06/2008
We know more about the processes. Great. We know more about the mechanics of this universe. Yay.
Don't get me wrong, it's a big achievement. Science is very powerful. It's brought good, it's brought bad. It's made life easier, it's made life tougher.
But it cannot account for the magic I witness in life. The manifestation of my consciousness, the joy of getting together, the love you may feel, incredible encounters one may have etc..
You could also ask the question: does chance exist? Atheists will say yes. The others will say no.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Peesocake
948 posts
Joined 02/2007
Grindcore
2371 posts
Joined 11/2008
What would be the point then. If God made you believe or showed himself so even the most cynical doubter..... what good would it do?
So why would He create man in his very own paradise and speak to them directly, telling them not to eat the apple? And why would He send his very own son to earth to perform actual miracles to proof the religions people had at that time are false and they should start believing in God? If anything, right now is the time for him to show himself (or send another son that can perform miracles or whatever) as documentation and communication have improved so much and thus the effect would be much better than 2000 years ago.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Acombfosho
3147 posts
Joined 06/2008
improva
3767 posts
Joined 02/2008
We know more about the processes. Great. We know more about the mechanics of this universe. Yay.
Don't get me wrong, it's a big achievement. Science is very powerful. It's brought good, it's brought bad. It's made life easier, it's made life tougher.
But it cannot account for the magic I witness in life. The manifestation of my consciousness, the joy of getting together, the love you may feel, incredible encounters one may have etc..
You could also ask the question: does chance exist? Atheists will say yes. The others will say no.
Why do you need an explanation? Why not just accept that there are some things we cannot explain. Some questions that might not even be meaningful to ask.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
"GLUIPERIG"
1606 posts
Joined 01/2011
bjordan
640 posts
Joined 02/2009
Funny how this thread is called the religion thread, and it's full with a bunch of atheists. Something itchy guys?
.
I'm sure if there was an atheist thread there would be a bunch of religions people in it as well. It's just the nature of the topic. It will always bring debate no matter what the intention. Any time belief is involved there's really not much point in debating though. You can't really debate belief. As I said in the thread earlier it's my opinion that, "You can't reason someone out of something they didn't reason themselves into", so I generally don't try.
Again the above statement isn't exclusive to religious beliefs, but beliefs in general.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
tHeBoYmUsTdIe
1530 posts
Joined 01/2010
You could also ask the question: does chance exist? Atheists will say yes. The others will say no.
You all are on a poker forum and don't 'believe' in chance lol. This thread is reaching all new heights for redundancy. We should all ask Phil Ivey what god he believes in, as clearly it's the right one.
Why do you think people come to believe that poker sites are rigged? The exact same mechanism that makes them believe in god.
Our brain doesn't think in the random. It is pattern seeking. When something that we think is 'ridiculously unlikely' happens there just has to be someone behind the curtains, pulling the strings..
No...there doesn't!
We should do a meaningless scientific experiment and test all the people who truly believe that poker is rigged and then find out how many of them believe in a deity. I'll bet the correlation is retardedly high.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
mitch
2007 posts
Joined 01/2008
TtheAntlers
1270 posts
Joined 01/2010