Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by sthief09 (Micro/Small Stakes)

Search and Destroy: Episode One

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Search and Destroy: Episode One by sthief09

Sthief09 brings you up to speed on the premise of the series and begins getting into stat ranges and the like.

About Search and Destroy Subscribe to

Sthief09 is back for another season, helping out DC's loyal members at 6max NLHE. This season he'll be searching through members' databases in an effort to destroy leaks that have been holding them back. Viewers will learn how to pick up on leaks in their own databases via reading into stats, running filters, and reviewing hands.

Tags

sthief09 ipod friendly powerpoint stat ranges classroom search and destroy

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 49 minutes long
  • Posted about 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Search and Destroy: Episode One

or track by Email or RSS


sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

Series' title from The Ramones? Wink

Quick question: for those who watched your AppAttack, is there any new information available in the new series?
If I use and am familiar with Leakbuster filters - is there anything more I can learn from your new videos?

Kind regards
Pawel




I think we played together on FTP like 5 years ago. I had a Swedish coach at the time (MDMA) and I can still here his voice in my head from when we'd review hands. "Magister Luuuudi"

To answer your questions:
- Yes, this will be much different from App Attack as a whole. It will be similar in concept to the video where I reviewed Lucas' db. It will just be much more in-depth. I've been going through many peoples' databases trying to find people with different leaks so I can run all sorts of different filters throughout the videos. That App Attack video sort of glossed over this, whereas these videos will be a comprehensive look at breaking your game down by filtering. The stats are an attempt to sort of expedite that process by honing in on certain parts of one's game.

- I have two problems with LB: (1) is that they just throw tons of numbers and filters at you and it can be overwhelming. It's also tough to know where sample sizes are insufficient. (2) is that it's a computer program so it lacks any sort of common sense.

My goal for this series is basically for you to be your own LeakBuster by knowing what to look for and how to look for it, using your common sense and understanding of the filters. This video was basically just to get you started. For the rest of them, you'll be able to see how I go about looking at the db of specific players, and there will also be a lot of resulting NLHE strategy discussion.

As you can hopefully tell, I'm passionate about this, and I'm confident it'll be worth viewing even if you have LB. I've been doing this type of thing long before I knew about LB.

Posted about 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

Is this series focussing on 6-max or Full Ring or both?




I had a couple of people offer up db's with a lot of Full Ring play. the problem is, I just don't know about the stat ranges for FR. This series will still be helpful for a FR player, and the filters still apply, I just won't be able to say "your zzz stat is xx%. that's high, so run a filter."

Posted about 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

Hey Josh,

I'm having a little trouble with this formula too, could you show how you work it out with some sample numbers please?




The way the formula SHOULD be (as I said, I'm going to see what I can do regarding getting this fixed):

(WWSF - wtsd*w$@SD) / (1- wtsd)

WWSF = 45%
WTSD = 25%
W$@SD = 50%

(.45 - .25*.50) / (1 - .25) = 43.3% won without showdown.

Posted about 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

Right now I'm planning on doing 50NL-200NL. I know a lot of people play 25NL and below. How much interest is there in me having one vid with a 25NL player's db?

Posted about 2 years ago

MagisterLudi

Avatar for MagisterLudi

173 posts
Joined 12/2009

I think we played together on FTP like 5 years ago. I had a Swedish coach at the time (MDMA) and I can still here his voice in my head from when we'd review hands. "Magister Luuuudi"

To answer your questions:
- Yes, this will be much different from App Attack as a whole. It will be similar in concept to the video where I reviewed Lucas' db. It will just be much more in-depth. I've been going through many peoples' databases trying to find people with different leaks so I can run all sorts of different filters throughout the videos. That App Attack video sort of glossed over this, whereas these videos will be a comprehensive look at breaking your game down by filtering. The stats are an attempt to sort of expedite that process by honing in on certain parts of one's game.

- I have two problems with LB: (1) is that they just throw tons of numbers and filters at you and it can be overwhelming. It's also tough to know where sample sizes are insufficient. (2) is that it's a computer program so it lacks any sort of common sense.

My goal for this series is basically for you to be your own LeakBuster by knowing what to look for and how to look for it, using your common sense and understanding of the filters. This video was basically just to get you started. For the rest of them, you'll be able to see how I go about looking at the db of specific players, and there will also be a lot of resulting NLHE strategy discussion.

As you can hopefully tell, I'm passionate about this, and I'm confident it'll be worth viewing even if you have LB. I've been doing this type of thing long before I knew about LB.




Thank you for your answer. It's convinced me to prepare myself for watching the whole series.
But please use bigger databases now than in AppAttack!

You're taking me for someone else. I play poker for just little over 2 years. The only thing we have in common is that I made a comment in one of your AppAttack episodesWink This name is from Hermann Hesse's book, I guess someone else also read this, or just liked an idea of having "Master of the game" login in Latin Wink

Regards

Posted about 2 years ago

spotDEspot

Avatar for spotDEspot

910 posts
Joined 06/2008

yours would be about 43% (see above post).


Thanks - I wish it was I just invented those numbers to see if they made a significant difference - mine is actually just under 40% - need some more aggression....but playing very stationey micro games (NL20/25/30) so I need to be careful how I manage it I think (WTSD% 27% W$SD% 52.8%....WWSF only 43.2% for last 50k hands)

I will go through those filters you showed for low WWSF in detail to see what stands out.

Posted about 2 years ago

simpleasspie

Avatar for simpleasspie

404 posts
Joined 05/2009

Time Link to 00:19:27

You meant to write if flop cbet/turn cbet is bigger than 1.8 not less


I've put together stat for Won % without showdown, you can download the customstats.txt file here
http://tinyurl.com/4f3yuwn
just put it in your holdemmanager/reports folder (or add the text from the file if you already have it)
then add the stat from the custom stats category

Posted about 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

You meant to write if flop cbet/turn cbet is bigger than 1.8 not less


I've put together stat for Won % without showdown, you can download the customstats.txt file here
http://tinyurl.com/4f3yuwn
just put it in your holdemmanager/reports folder (or add the text from the file if you already have it)
then add the stat from the custom stats category



thanks very much for posting this!

Posted about 2 years ago

Steppin Razor

Avatar for Steppin Razor

Section 9
2237 posts
Joined 12/2009

Really looking forward to this series.

My W$ w/o SD percentage is higher than my W$ @ SD. I'm assuming that's not normal, but can having such a high W$ w/o SD effect the W$ @ SD? Obv the latter affects the former, but does it work both ways? Or do I just need to stop calling the f'ing river (which I need to do regardless of the answer).

Posted about 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

Really looking forward to this series.

My W$ w/o SD percentage is higher than my W$ @ SD. I'm assuming that's not normal, but can having such a high W$ w/o SD effect the W$ @ SD? Obv the latter affects the former, but does it work both ways? Or do I just need to stop calling the f'ing river (which I need to do regardless of the answer).




What exactly are your WWSF/WtSD/W$@SD?

Posted about 2 years ago

Phatty

Avatar for Phatty

313 posts
Joined 05/2009

Dang I really wish this focused on FR Frown ... I'll still watch, though.

Posted about 2 years ago

Steppin Razor

Avatar for Steppin Razor

Section 9
2237 posts
Joined 12/2009

What exactly are your WWSF/WtSD/W$@SD?


WWSF = 48.7

WtSD = 28.2

W$@SD = 46.4

Posted about 2 years ago

illsabio

Avatar for illsabio

273 posts
Joined 10/2010

Right now I'm planning on doing 50NL-200NL. I know a lot of people play 25NL and below. How much interest is there in me having one vid with a 25NL player's db?



Yeah that would nice!!!

Posted about 2 years ago

life nit

Avatar for life nit

225 posts
Joined 11/2010

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

2154 posts
Joined 07/2007

WWSF = 48.7

WtSD = 28.2

W$@SD = 46.4




yeah that's probably an issue assuming we're not looking at a small sample. I would suspect you're making too many of those protection (not for value, not as bluff) bets on early streets. If your agg% on the flop is in the 50s, that's probably the case. aggression is obviously a good thing in general, but sometimes it hinders your ability to manipulate the pot effectively.

I'd also take a look at the river call efficiency to see if that's low.

If neither of these things are true, let me know and I'll think about some other possible reasons. 46% won at showdown is troubling.

Posted about 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsGeneral Poker Discussion → Search and Destroy : Episode One