---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by sthief09 (Micro/Small Stakes)

Time Link to 00:29:33

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

Series' title from The Ramones?

Quick question: for those who watched your AppAttack, is there any new information available in the new series?
If I use and am familiar with Leakbuster filters - is there anything more I can learn from your new videos?

Kind regards
Pawel

Time Link to 00:29:29

Hey Josh,

I'm having a little trouble with this formula too, could you show how you work it out with some sample numbers please?

awesome 1st ep, looking forward to the rest

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

Is this series focussing on 6-max or Full Ring or both?

Series' title from The Ramones?

Quick question: for those who watched your AppAttack, is there any new information available in the new series?
If I use and am familiar with Leakbuster filters - is there anything more I can learn from your new videos?

Kind regards
Pawel

That would interest me as well - maybe also some stuff about the holdemVision of HEM?

Anyways,
I think this will be a very interesting series^^

Series' title from The Ramones?

Rather Iggy & the Stooges

/end derail

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

My issue here is with how you get something close to 42% let alone 44%. If you have WWSF% of 45% (pretty much ok), WTSD% of 26% (standard?), and W$SD% of say 51% (good?) then with my math this comes to:

(0.45 - (0.26*0.51)) * (1-0.26) = 0.235 or 23.5% - I guess I am missing something here?

The series is looking great btw - I already found a few issues with just a few spare minutes I had at lunch with the filters.....

Rather Iggy & the Stooges

/end derail

Oh yes, my bad. I confused it with "Havana Affair".
Sorry for offtopic.

UGH that should be a /(1-wtsd) not *(1-wtsd). I even watched the entire thing over again to make sure I didn't make any stupid mistakes like that. VIDEO PRODUCTION TILT

I'll see if I can have a new one put in the replace this.

For the time being, if anyone wants me to calculate for you, I'm happy to.

My issue here is with how you get something close to 42% let alone 44%. If you have WWSF% of 45% (pretty much ok), WTSD% of 26% (standard?), and W$SD% of say 51% (good?) then with my math this comes to:

(0.45 - (0.26*0.51)) * (1-0.26) = 0.235 or 23.5% - I guess I am missing something here?

The series is looking great btw - I already found a few issues with just a few spare minutes I had at lunch with the filters.....

yours would be about 43% (see above post).

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

Thanks.

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

I messed up the formula. look 2 posts up for explanation.

yours would be about 45%.