# Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by sthief09 (Micro/Small Stakes)

## Search and Destroy: Episode One

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

### Search and Destroy: Episode One by sthief09

Sthief09 brings you up to speed on the premise of the series and begins getting into stat ranges and the like.

Sthief09 is back for another season, helping out DC's loyal members at 6max NLHE. This season he'll be searching through members' databases in an effort to destroy leaks that have been holding them back. Viewers will learn how to pick up on leaks in their own databases via reading into stats, running filters, and reviewing hands.

### Video Details

• Game:
• Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
• 49 minutes long
• Posted over 2 years ago

## Comments for Search and Destroy: Episode One

or track by Email or RSS

#### babaa

35 posts
Joined 09/2008

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

#### MagisterLudi

173 posts
Joined 12/2009

Series' title from The Ramones?

Quick question: for those who watched your AppAttack, is there any new information available in the new series?
If I use and am familiar with Leakbuster filters - is there anything more I can learn from your new videos?

Kind regards
Pawel

#### TheGeek

1478 posts
Joined 01/2009

Hey Josh,

I'm having a little trouble with this formula too, could you show how you work it out with some sample numbers please?

#### life nit

225 posts
Joined 11/2010

awesome 1st ep, looking forward to the rest

#### life nit

225 posts
Joined 11/2010

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

#### BoterSmoter

75 posts
Joined 11/2009

Is this series focussing on 6-max or Full Ring or both?

#### Prologion

2079 posts
Joined 03/2010

Series' title from The Ramones?

Quick question: for those who watched your AppAttack, is there any new information available in the new series?
If I use and am familiar with Leakbuster filters - is there anything more I can learn from your new videos?

Kind regards
Pawel

That would interest me as well - maybe also some stuff about the holdemVision of HEM?

Anyways,
I think this will be a very interesting series^^

#### Thoreau

1 posts
Joined 11/2010

Series' title from The Ramones?

Rather Iggy & the Stooges

/end derail

#### spotDEspot

910 posts
Joined 06/2008

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

My issue here is with how you get something close to 42% let alone 44%. If you have WWSF% of 45% (pretty much ok), WTSD% of 26% (standard?), and W\$SD% of say 51% (good?) then with my math this comes to:

(0.45 - (0.26*0.51)) * (1-0.26) = 0.235 or 23.5% - I guess I am missing something here?

The series is looking great btw - I already found a few issues with just a few spare minutes I had at lunch with the filters.....

#### MagisterLudi

173 posts
Joined 12/2009

Rather Iggy & the Stooges

/end derail

Oh yes, my bad. I confused it with "Havana Affair".
Sorry for offtopic.

#### sthief09

2355 posts
Joined 07/2007

UGH that should be a /(1-wtsd) not *(1-wtsd). I even watched the entire thing over again to make sure I didn't make any stupid mistakes like that. VIDEO PRODUCTION TILT

I'll see if I can have a new one put in the replace this.

For the time being, if anyone wants me to calculate for you, I'm happy to.

#### sthief09

2355 posts
Joined 07/2007

My issue here is with how you get something close to 42% let alone 44%. If you have WWSF% of 45% (pretty much ok), WTSD% of 26% (standard?), and W\$SD% of say 51% (good?) then with my math this comes to:

(0.45 - (0.26*0.51)) * (1-0.26) = 0.235 or 23.5% - I guess I am missing something here?

The series is looking great btw - I already found a few issues with just a few spare minutes I had at lunch with the filters.....

yours would be about 43% (see above post).

#### babaa

35 posts
Joined 09/2008

this should be

(0.46 - (0.268 * 0.49)) * (1 - 0.268) = 24.06%

just divide your stats by 100 before putting it into the formula

Thanks.

#### sthief09

2355 posts
Joined 07/2007

(46 - (26,8 * 49)) * (1 - 26,8) = 32 693,76

looks like I did something wrong ?

I messed up the formula. look 2 posts up for explanation.