Poker Video: Misc/Other by Tommy Angelo (Micro/Small Stakes)

The Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment: Episode Two

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

The Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment: Episode Two by Tommy Angelo

Today we take the second step on the path to poker enlightenment, right thinking. Tommy and Wayne discuss topics like position, anticipation, door a and door b, reciprocality, rake, rules, and lopping off the C game.

About The Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment Subscribe to

Join Tommy Angelo (author of Elements of Poker) and Wayne Lively as they embark on the Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment. This remarkable series is an excellent companion to Tommy's book and has been lovingly crafted over the past year. Featuring brand new musical composition from Tommy, this series is designed with the iPod in mind and transcends standard video poker training. Watch. Listen. Breathe. Win.

Tags

tommy angelo wayne lively the eightfold path to poker enlightenment ipod friendly tilt control

Video Details

  • Game: other
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 47 minutes long
  • Posted almost 4 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for The Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment: Episode Two

or track by Email or RSS


Tommy Angelo

Avatar for Tommy Angelo

247 posts
Joined 10/2007

Looking at the graph, it seems like the 'eventually' has no c-game, while you say everybody has a C-game

So is the 'eventually' graph when you die?



Yup! That's one of the two things I had in mind when I decided to end the graph with a "flat line." The other is that it's possible to flat-line without dying. That has been called things like nirvana and satori. It means being in a state of non-resistance to everything. In that space, there is no C game, or A game or B game. There just is.

Tommy

Posted almost 4 years ago

Tommy Angelo

Avatar for Tommy Angelo

247 posts
Joined 10/2007

As I said, this is in no way a negative thing, and probably actually helps the learning process.



Agreed on both points. In this series, repetition (I prefer that word over "redundancy") isn't merely a part of the teaching method, it's also one of the lessons! (As you'll soon find out, repeatedly, in episode 3. :-) )

Tommy

Posted almost 4 years ago

SnappieVouz

Avatar for SnappieVouz

2593 posts
Joined 03/2009

Yup! That's one of the two things I had in mind when I decided to end the graph with a "flat line." The other is that it's possible to flat-line without dying. That has been called things like nirvana and satori. It means being in a state of non-resistance to everything. In that space, there is no C game, or A game or B game. There just is.

Tommy



So it's possible that you will end up having "your game", instead of "a, b or c game"?

Or do you mean that there is no A, B or C game because without an A-game there also isn't a B or C game, which makes it all connected to eachother and without A, C couldn't excist?

Posted almost 4 years ago

Chazb0t

Avatar for Chazb0t

1816 posts
Joined 01/2009

elieliasson

Avatar for elieliasson

4 posts
Joined 03/2008

You attach to the value that your mind assigns to it, in the same way you attach to a car or a lover. And since everything deteriorates and/or ends, attachment always causes suffering.

Tommy



Everything you said before made me happy, this made me sad.
Isnt that the mindset of really lonly, and sad people. Possibly living
in a small house out in the mittle of no where, whitout family?

Posted almost 4 years ago

Wayne Lively

Avatar for Wayne Lively

539 posts
Joined 05/2007

Being emotionally attached to your cards, what does this exactly mean?




Ever seen somebody who couldn't throw away AK after the flop? Many times players, esp tight players, feel they waited so long to get a good hand they can't throw it away, even if they are sure they are behind.

Ego has a lot to do with stuff, more than we want to believe.

Wayne

Posted almost 4 years ago

Wayne Lively

Avatar for Wayne Lively

539 posts
Joined 05/2007

Everything you said before made me happy, this made me sad.
Isnt that the mindset of really lonly, and sad people. Possibly living
in a small house out in the mittle of no where, whitout family?



A big fallacy is detachment leads to emptiness. It is not, but a appreciation of fullness, which can only come with cessation of suffering. A true love is one without complication.

Tommy is no ascetic, but one of the best hedonists I know.

Wayne

Posted almost 4 years ago

Wayne Lively

Avatar for Wayne Lively

539 posts
Joined 05/2007

So it's possible that you will end up having "your game", instead of "a, b or c game"?



I think of it like pi.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Tommy Angelo

Avatar for Tommy Angelo

247 posts
Joined 10/2007

ME:

You attach to the value that your mind assigns to it, in the same way you attach to a car or a lover. And since everything deteriorates and/or ends, attachment always causes suffering.



YOU:

Everything you said before made me happy, this made me sad.
Isnt that the mindset of really lonly, and sad people. Possibly living
in a small house out in the mittle of no where, whitout family?



Couple things...

Gratefulness in the moment means being content with your new car during the moments you are with it, without worrying about it getting scratched or old in the future, because right now, it's not scratched, and if you come outside tomorrow to find that someone did a hit-and-run on your parked car and crushed the bumper, then you would be exactly as content with your reality at that moment as you were yesterday. Non-attachment doesn't mean non-enjoyment. It means non-discontentment.

It's possible to live alone in a small house in the middle of nowhere with no family and be blissfully happy. If someone who lives alone in a small house in the middle of nowhere with no family is unhappy, it's not because of their circumstances, it's because of their attachment to mental formations in their mind as to how things "used to be" or how things "should be." If their body and mind were to actually live in the reality that actually is, they would not be unhappy.

Tommy

Posted almost 4 years ago

Big Owl

Avatar for Big Owl

270 posts
Joined 02/2008



Gratefulness in the moment means being content with your new car during the moments you are with it, without worrying about it getting scratched or old in the future, because right now, it's not scratched, and if you come outside tomorrow to find that someone did a hit-and-run on your parked car and crushed the bumper, then you would be exactly as content with your reality at that moment as you were yesterday. Non-attachment doesn't mean non-enjoyment. It means non-discontentment.

It's possible to live alone in a small house in the middle of nowhere with no family and be blissfully happy. If someone who lives alone in a small house in the middle of nowhere with no family is unhappy, it's not because of their circumstances, it's because of their attachment to mental formations in their mind as to how things "used to be" or how things "should be." If their body and mind were to actually live in the reality that actually is, they would not be unhappy.

Tommy



Nice

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8045 posts
Joined 11/2006

Guys -- just FWIW, but MP3s of this have been added to the download menu. Smile

Rob

Posted almost 4 years ago

Straydog

Avatar for Straydog

3 posts
Joined 06/2008

Guys -- just FWIW, but MP3s of this have been added to the download menu. Smile

Rob



Great!

Posted almost 4 years ago

Sounded Simple

Avatar for Sounded Simple

1009 posts
Joined 03/2008

Gratefulness in the moment means being content with your new car during the moments you are with it, without worrying about it getting scratched or old in the future, because right now, it's not scratched, and if you come outside tomorrow to find that someone did a hit-and-run on your parked car and crushed the bumper, then you would be exactly as content with your reality at that moment as you were yesterday. Non-attachment doesn't mean non-enjoyment. It means non-discontentment.



This is something that I have been thinking about a lot and the above paragraph makes total sense in the context of a possession.

Translating that into poker and the quest for tiltlessness, how does our enjoyment of when it's going well relate to our possible tilt when it's not?

To use a typical example in NL, we have QQ in a blind battle against an aggressive player and ship over his 4-bet (assume we are totally confident and correct in analysis that all is +EV with the play).

Possibility 1:
Opponent shows JJ, river is a J. I'm totally fine with the fact that I need to disregard the river and concentrate my efforts on taking note of any information that the opponent has given me in this hand then prepare for the next.
Possibility 2:
Opponent shows AA, river is a Q. I think I'm not alone when I say this makes me happy, maybe even elated. I may even feel a little more alert and positive, my confidence is up and I am a step closer to "A Game".

My question is this:
Does our level of emotion in "Possibility 2" have an effect on our ability to control our emotion in "Possibility 1"?

I'm confused because (for me anyway) the positive emotion in "Possibility 2" can have a positive effect on mindset. However in this context wouldn't it be easier to aim for an unemotional reaction to both situations rather than try to filter good and bad emotion?
I should add that while I am aware of how I should react in "Possibility 1" I'm still very much in the learning process.

Posted almost 4 years ago

shades

Avatar for shades

846 posts
Joined 06/2008

Another great episode , nice work guys
Im confused about the goals and target discussion , you say goals are set up which result in sucess or failure , but should we not set up goals to help give us a direction , to have an idea where we want to go and then use targets as a means of what we need to do to get there.
As a small stakes player would you say its bad to make a goal which says for example, by the end of the year i hope to be playing and beating X limit. Then realise what must be done in order to acheive this goal and set up your targets.
Do you not think goals help you have motivation ? If i was to set up a goal which was to play 30k hands of poker next month do you not think id more likely play the 30k or close to it rather than if i had set up no goal and just played as much or as little as i felt like ?

Posted almost 4 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

Guys -- just FWIW, but MP3s of this have been added to the download menu. Smile

Rob


That's great, but why are the files double the size of the MP4?

Posted almost 4 years ago




HomePoker ForumsGeneral Poker Discussion → The Eightfold Path to Poker Enlightenment : Episode Two