---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Grindcore (Micro/Small Stakes)

Time Link to 00:22:07

With 77 here, you say if he check-shoves, you would snap it here. Why?

What range do you put him on for that play and why do you think 77 does well against that range or against this particular villain and his image?

MP4 is the same (or better) quality as WMV and smaller filesize. Google VLC player if you can't open mp4 files.

Downloading that now. I figured vlc would play it. VLC plays betamax doesn't it?

Time Link to 00:37:56

What a strange way to think about doubling up a fish. I've never considered it that way before. But wouldn't you want to rather double up a fish on your right than on your left? Can you expand on ths topic a bit more?

Downloading that now. I figured vlc would play it. VLC plays betamax doesn't it?

VLC plays about anything. There's really no reason to ever download the wmv format if you can play back mp4 imo.

With 77 here, you say if he check-shoves, you would snap it here. Why?

What range do you put him on for that play and why do you think 77 does well against that range or against this particular villain and his image?

Any pair, any gutter, random overs... Note his stacksize, it's perfect for shoving, less than pot. I'm not even making a crying call when he shoves, I'm probably ahead. If we're 100bbs deep and he checkraises to the same ammount that would be a shove here I just fold.

Just make your best guess. But put yourself in villains shoes. If you're on the river with A9, are you really betting? Do you think a jack will really call? Alot of people will check back there with Ax atleast some % of the time, and all straight draws and spades missed. There's also not really a difference between KJ and A9 of spades there, which you could easily get to the river with in the same fashion. Though you probably find the call with A9 easier. Also don't underestimate potodds. You only need to be good 29% of the time to call there.

do you make the call without holding a blocker (you have the Kd) to the runner runner flush as well?

????

Both the 4th and 5th Eps point to the same WMV link. Would someone pls correct this. Which is which?

All,
I apologize as today was a travel day for me and I just sat down. I have fixed the link for Episode 4 (it was going to episode 5) so now all should be able to get two separate wmv's. Enjoy.
-Rusty

excellent video. you make it look so easy. is it more a result of work away from the tables, or playing fewer tables w/ greater focus?

excellent video. you make it look so easy. is it more a result of work away from the tables, or playing fewer tables w/ greater focus?

Probably both, and having alot of experience now obviously helps too.

do you make the call without holding a blocker (you have the Kd) to the runner runner flush as well?

Yes, that's only a tiny bit of equity different. The call is not that close I think.

Time Link to 00:42:17

He's not the PFR

Time Link to 00:38:39

Very interesting hand on table 4. When he barrels, the turn, his value range is super narrow, and if he is aggressive he should fire the river. Given the context, how big a bet would you have called, on the river ?

Also , I think Improva, talked about this specific situation in the video in which he used the StoxEv model.....

Thanks.

Time Link to 00:14:21

http://memegenerator.net/Instances/936/Apathy-Dog-VALUE-BET-3RD-PAIR-CHECK-BACK-TOP-PAIR.jpg

really really appreciate this video. imo you have a really good thought process that is explained well. i play 100-400nl FR on stars and i learned a crapload on your videos. thanks!!!

Time Link to 00:25:51

table 2 quad 7 hand:
Would you put a pocket pair (specificaly 88-TT) in his range at the turn?