---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Grindcore (Micro/Small Stakes)

Time Link to 00:41:16

Did you notice the hand going on on table 2? 3bet pot, flop goes check check, turn the 3bettor bets $3 in $40 or something, then he overbets pot on the river? What do u think about that hand? KK only ?

great episode!!!

Time Link to 00:50:34

you note that villain is an unknown and still c/c the river w/KJ.

From your experience do you think unknown villains are not capable of value-betting their A-x hands on this board texture? I ask because I have trouble calling down like you did in this spot.

Time Link to 00:50:26

Feel like I need to clarify my question a bit more:

Against an unknown villain, what leads you to determine that he's bluffing a third barrel here over value-betting an A-x or potentially even a set?

any update on this?

MP4 is the same (or better) quality as WMV and smaller filesize. Google VLC player if you can't open mp4 files.

You should try the frog avatar then

You should try the frog avatar then

Yeah, that was my 2nd choice. But the turtle has a better confused look imo, and my favourite childhood stuffed animal was a turtle too.

Yeah, that was my 2nd choice. But the turtle has a better confused look imo, and my favourite childhood stuffed animal was a turtle too.

Best confused avatar is the penguin

ainec

Yeah but it doesn't have the same effect when you change it to happy from confused. His shell also protects him from barrels and when he has the nuts he also always get payed because they expect him to slowplay it. And there's also a turtle species called snapping turtle. Turtle wins imo.

Yeah but it doesn't have the same effect when you change it to happy from confused. His shell also protects him from barrels and when he has the nuts he also always get payed because they expect him to slowplay it. And there's also a turtle species called snapping turtle. Turtle wins imo.

Can't argue with this logic!

zombie avatar has the best confused look imo.

Did you notice the hand going on on table 2? 3bet pot, flop goes check check, turn the 3bettor bets $3 in $40 or something, then he overbets pot on the river? What do u think about that hand? KK only ?

You messed up the timelink I think. Please timelink to the start of the hand. I manually searched 2 minutes before and after your timelink and still couldn't find the described hand.

The wmv link goes to the same file as 5th episode.

????

Both the 4th and 5th Eps point to the same WMV link. Would someone pls correct this. Which is which?

Feel like I need to clarify my question a bit more:

Against an unknown villain, what leads you to determine that he's bluffing a third barrel here over value-betting an A-x or potentially even a set?

Just make your best guess. But put yourself in villains shoes. If you're on the river with A9, are you really betting? Do you think a jack will really call? Alot of people will check back there with Ax atleast some % of the time, and all straight draws and spades missed. There's also not really a difference between KJ and A9 of spades there, which you could easily get to the river with in the same fashion. Though you probably find the call with A9 easier. Also don't underestimate potodds. You only need to be good 29% of the time to call there.

At 42:30 or so you make a note that "Long Nguy3n" check-calls the flop with TP as preflop raiser, but he wasn't the preflop raiser, the guy with 55 was.

I always hated iPoker for their overlong timebank and players like you btw... It's just so f***ing tilting to play against some people who take 10+ seconds to think in like every third time they have to make a decision. That's what I like about Ongame, their ultra-short (something like 10sec?) timebank for each action is great imo.

Also, the more time I have, the more I level myself to make stupid -EV calls.