pokergarden
374 posts
Joined 11/2010
D3rJack
444 posts
Joined 02/2010
given villain isn´t full stacked and unknown he´s more likely to be a fish, so definitely 3bet preflop!!!!
don´t hate calling down as played, because he´s giving you good odds, and you immediately get info on his bet sizing, which has a lot of benefits against weak players. given he seems to be fishy i don´t agree that his betting doesn´t make sense for an overpair, because you never know with these players. anyway i think calling can be fine, because there is a chance that villain might bluff this way, you get good odds and you gain information. not saying it´s a very clear call though.
I do hate bluffraising, because we can´t assume without more information that a weak player will fold anything he´s valuebetting to a raise and you do beat bluffs.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Adriano85
898 posts
Joined 02/2012
It's dangerous to assume things based on betsizing from unknown recreational players. He could easily have a set or queens (for example) and bet small because he don't want you to fold. Recreational players have a different way of thinking and it's tricky to think they would play their hands the same way as you.
I would 3bet this pre because I think this villain is not thinking about positions and can call you with a lot of weaker hands.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
terp
1996 posts
Joined 01/2008
given villain isn´t full stacked and unknown he´s more likely to be a fish, so definitely 3bet preflop!!!!
don´t hate calling down as played, because he´s giving you good odds, and you immediately get info on his bet sizing, which has a lot of benefits against weak players. given he seems to be fishy i don´t agree that his betting doesn´t make sense for an overpair, because you never know with these players. anyway i think calling can be fine, because there is a chance that villain might bluff this way, you get good odds and you gain information. not saying it´s a very clear call though.
I do hate bluffraising, because we can´t assume without more information that a weak player will fold anything he´s valuebetting to a raise and you do beat bluffs.
all this is an excellent reply, though i don't rely 100% on betsizing reads until i have more info - i think we can slightly discount those hands, though
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
pokergarden
374 posts
Joined 11/2010