Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by KRANTZ (Micro/Small Stakes)

Creative Grinders: Episode Two

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Creative Grinders: Episode Two by KRANTZ

KRANTZ and the creative grinders review a 4-tabling 100NL video.

About Creative Grinders Subscribe to

KRANTZ partners up with 'Creative Grinders', a poker think tank featuring international players of all skill levels. Jay will assist the group with HH review, video review, and discussions centered on specific poker concepts. Get to know all new players and personalities and follow their progress plugging leaks and achieving their goals! Mainly NLHE 6max.

Tags

krantz creative grinders hh review 100 nl 100nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 63 minutes long
  • Posted over 1 year ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Creative Grinders: Episode Two

or track by Email or RSS


zachd2323

Avatar for zachd2323

2852 posts
Joined 04/2010

Time Link to 00:43:34

What's the difference between having TT vs. any other random hand if we are going to cold 4-bet/fold?

Posted over 1 year ago

zachd2323

Avatar for zachd2323

2852 posts
Joined 04/2010

Time Link to 01:02:01

Why the hell is David Garrard on his list? Haha thats great......FWF is such a football fish!

Posted over 1 year ago

KRANTZ

Avatar for KRANTZ

3107 posts
Joined 07/2007

What's the difference between having TT vs. any other random hand if we are going to cold 4-bet/fold?



not much. i suppose the fact that we have TT causes us to consider the situation more often than if we had J2off or the like, but there isn't much difference between the two in a vacuum

Posted over 1 year ago

PutMyRobeOnRITE

Avatar for PutMyRobeOnRITE

193 posts
Joined 06/2009

The funny thing is I like most sports, I just acted emotionally trying to defend soccer....let's all be friends :-)


The best soccer player in the world couldnt make the worst nfl, nba, mlb team. Who gives a shit if ronaldo can has a higher vert than Koby(which I highly doubt)? Maybe he could be a decent shortstop but he couldnt hit the ball out of the infield. Maybe he could be a be an ok receiver but the second he got hit he would go down crying and hoping for a pink card. The only shot ronaldo(your best soccer player im assuming) would have at making a pro american sports team would be a point guard in the nba. And thats because there is no contact and acting like a pussy gets you free throws.

Im not saying soccer players arent athletes, Im just saying theye in the same group of athletes as marathon runners and cyclists. Great cardio? Yes. Athletes? No.

We already compete worldwide and do ok.

Im not even going to mention how terrible the actual game is. What a joke.

Posted over 1 year ago

capt_hindsight

Avatar for capt_hindsight

73 posts
Joined 01/2012

The funny thing is I like most sports, I just acted emotionally trying to defend soccer....let's all be friends :-)



I agree. As you can see my tone changed in my last post after I re read my first 2 posts. Its a really pointless argument. Its like arguing politics or religion.

Posted over 1 year ago

zachd2323

Avatar for zachd2323

2852 posts
Joined 04/2010

Yeah I'm kind of glad we are the only country that plays "football." It makes it that much better imo. I'd rather watch football than soccer and it's not even close, but to each his own. It doesn't bother me.

Posted over 1 year ago

KRANTZ

Avatar for KRANTZ

3107 posts
Joined 07/2007

Why the hell is David Garrard on his list? Haha thats great......FWF is such a football fish!



We made the bet in early 08, the list was: Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Ben Roethlisberger, Tony Romo, Philip Rivers, Drew Brees, Garrard. Garrard was coming off a sick season. Best drunk bet ever

Posted over 1 year ago

capt_hindsight

Avatar for capt_hindsight

73 posts
Joined 01/2012

Im pretty sure Garrard will be back in the league next year at least as a backup. Would you rather have him or David Carr? Excuse me, super bowl champion David Carr.

Posted over 1 year ago

zachd2323

Avatar for zachd2323

2852 posts
Joined 04/2010

We made the bet in early 08, the list was: Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Ben Roethlisberger, Tony Romo, Philip Rivers, Drew Brees, Garrard. Garrard was coming off a sick season. Best drunk bet ever



Good pick by you and Emil. The list still looks pretty good other than Garrard.

Posted over 1 year ago

paulgibbo

Avatar for paulgibbo

20 posts
Joined 12/2010

typical american.... a small fraction of the world play your silly sports... say 300m/ 6.5b or 5% - but it is the rest of the world that doesnt get it - the 6.2b who have never heard of Kobe, or Tebow or who the fuck ever...

if an individual thought something about themselves that was as self-deluded fantasy - he'd be strapped up and sent to a psychiatrist...

it would be funny if it wasnt so pathetic

Posted over 1 year ago

paulgibbo

Avatar for paulgibbo

20 posts
Joined 12/2010

you saying those fat slobs who play baseballs are athletes... gimme a break... and those deformed folks who play linebackers - people whose neck size exceeds their IQ? c'mon

Posted over 1 year ago

KRANTZ

Avatar for KRANTZ

3107 posts
Joined 07/2007

ALRIGHT GUYS KEEP THIS THREAD TO POKER DISCUSSION OR HOW AWESOME ELI MANNING IS PLS THX

OR JEREMY LIN!!!!!!!!!

Posted over 1 year ago

AAIcarusAA

Avatar for AAIcarusAA

65 posts
Joined 02/2011

Time Link to 00:07:42

Do you a have a standard size for 4 betting bluff ? I generelly do it 2.5 times the 3 bet and im getting a ton of calls.

Posted about 1 year ago

AAIcarusAA

Avatar for AAIcarusAA

65 posts
Joined 02/2011

Time Link to 00:41:33

I ve recently changed site and over a decent sample in NL100/200 i see most regs 3betting between 9% and 12% vs button or cutoff open when in the blinds. The difference comes on the 4 bet range. Im easily 4 betting and calling off vs a 3.0+ 4 bet with 99+. My question, or better my questions are:
A) Should i be inclines on doing it also with AQo?
B) Vs a guy that s not folding to 4 bet and also not shoving, when we 4 bet 99+, whats the plan on A high board or K high boards?
C) Vs u guy thats only 4 betting 1.5 , should we 4 bet fold? ( i know that we are 4 betting , not him, but i think its the closest indicator we have)

Posted about 1 year ago

KRANTZ

Avatar for KRANTZ

3107 posts
Joined 07/2007

I ve recently changed site and over a decent sample in NL100/200 i see most regs 3betting between 9% and 12% vs button or cutoff open when in the blinds. The difference comes on the 4 bet range. Im easily 4 betting and calling off vs a 3.0+ 4 bet with 99+. My question, or better my questions are:
A) Should i be inclines on doing it also with AQo?
B) Vs a guy that s not folding to 4 bet and also not shoving, when we 4 bet 99+, whats the plan on A high board or K high boards?
C) Vs u guy thats only 4 betting 1.5 , should we 4 bet fold? ( i know that we are 4 betting , not him, but i think its the closest indicator we have)



A) seems kind of thin, depends on the player in question though
B) bet small, shut down if called
C) yessir

Posted about 1 year ago




HomePoker ForumsSmall Stakes Shorthanded NL → Creative Grinders : Episode Two