Prologion
2079 posts
Joined 03/2010
JJ makes no sense for him to have
i would overcall A8s closing the action three-way or call in the SB had two people called, but i can't really provide any math
lol, was in hurry when I have written this -> obv. JJ is not in his range^^
So yeah, you would have 50% and hence it is indifferent if you jam or not.
Would still not do it b/c AA-KK will call here 100%, QTs imo not.
So there is for me too less Value in shoving compared of taking the showdown and to get from time to time some worthy information.
But yeah, it seems close - maybe at NL100 it is as default ok.
The posts of Improva about GTO have been btw. very interesting.
Still don`t know how to determine a GTO-strategy when there are still cards to come and hence EQ is a matter... - maybe you can it practically only approximate?
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
improva
3767 posts
Joined 02/2008
The posts of Improva about GTO have been btw. very interesting.
Still don`t know how to determine a GTO-strategy when there are still cards to come and hence EQ is a matter... - maybe you can it practically only approximate?
I have not looked at the differential equations or even written them down.
In most cases you can make a pretty good estimate.
But you are likely giving GTO too much value. There is much more value in good, solid hand reading.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shuttle
3333 posts
Joined 11/2008
Allermand_DK
775 posts
Joined 11/2008
lot of pessimism in this thread
when we have virtually 0 value combos we should be jamming them as a default unless we have a very good reason. ppl bet plenty of hands on the turn and river that can call here. we need him to bet call five hands worse than KK to call here. QTs alone is four, making this breakeven if he never calls worse than a straight.
really easy jam
i'd have folded pre and played flop and turn the same
I like your reasoning terp, it's a shove as a default, but why are you folding pre?
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
terp
1996 posts
Joined 01/2008
i'm open to persuasion on preflop, but i tend to play pretty snug here in general out of the SB not closing the action. it's really tough to say definitively, but we do have filters in HEM. see how you are doing in this exact spot with an array of hands. it's quite possible i am making a mistake playing too tight here.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Allermand_DK
775 posts
Joined 11/2008
i'm open to persuasion on preflop, but i tend to play pretty snug here in general out of the SB not closing the action. it's really tough to say definitively, but we do have filters in HEM. see how you are doing in this exact spot with an array of hands. it's quite possible i am making a mistake playing too tight here.
Good point. I think most ppl are not looking at their filters in HEM enough. But readless I think you can call here because 1, you have and ace-blocker hand, which decreases the chance of being squeezed (only BB can sqz) and 2. you have a nut-type hand, which have great implied odds.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Prologion
2079 posts
Joined 03/2010
I have not looked at the differential equations or even written them down.
In most cases you can make a pretty good estimate.
But you are likely giving GTO too much value. There is much more value in good, solid hand reading.
yeah, you are certainly right here.
Was just curious...^^
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote