Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by inavacuum (Micro/Small Stakes)

Yin and Yang: Episode Fourteen

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Yin and Yang: Episode Fourteen by inavacuum

Inavacuum reviews hands from $50 NL with his student.

About Yin and Yang Subscribe to

Yin meets yang at microstakes NL. The majority of pros view micro play as extremely standard with no room for creativity. While true for the most part, not embracing nonstandard lines will leave profit on the table.

Tags

inavacuum yin and yang hh review hand replayer ipod friendly small stakes 50nl 50 nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 54 minutes long
  • Posted almost 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Yin and Yang: Episode Fourteen

or track by Email or RSS


inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

if he is checking back the river its a easy shove i suppose?

I am asking this, because in the last three session I played the fish checkback the flush and I shove with toptwo or set.



It could be a shove, whatever amount you think the weaker parts of his range will call most often, obviously taking into account he can call bigger bets less often and this can still be the most profitable line as long as not always folding.

Posted almost 2 years ago

soleztis

Avatar for soleztis

DC Dalai Lama
1019 posts
Joined 09/2010

Time Link to 00:24:32

I like this play for the reasons stated, and agree with Inavacuum's reasoning for not shoving, however I think one point about the river was ignored.

We thought that his turn bet was either the nuts or pot control. Because we have the Ah, the "nuts" (or close to it) is K high, maybe Q high flushes, making pot control hands a fairly large amount of his range. (I also thing we often see a larger bet from his nutted hands, but that is another discussion). His pot control bets could often be attempts at cheap draws, but again we have Ah, diminishing hands that he really wants to draw to.

We now start getting close to a large part of his range being pot control hands that often want to get to showdown. By nature, if he is pot controlling these hands, his plan will often be to c/c river. Now, an argument can be made that he might call our 2/3-3/4 sized pot bets and we possibly shouldn't bet at all, or if we do bet it has to be a shove.

Posted almost 2 years ago

soleztis

Avatar for soleztis

DC Dalai Lama
1019 posts
Joined 09/2010

Time Link to 00:39:31

Is our river bet too large for hands that we are targeting calls from on the river?

Posted almost 2 years ago

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

I don't think so, he should call with Jx either way and fold worse, if we think he's going be calling with worse you could size it down slightly. Once hero takes the line of bet/x/bet then any pair worse than JT is more or less the same thing.

Posted almost 2 years ago

soleztis

Avatar for soleztis

DC Dalai Lama
1019 posts
Joined 09/2010

I don't think so, he should call with Jx either way and fold worse, if we think he's going be calling with worse you could size it down slightly. Once hero takes the line of bet/x/bet then any pair worse than JT is more or less the same thing.



makes sense

Posted almost 2 years ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

Time Link to 00:11:50

I don't think we should fold on the turn, because villain's value range of better hands is pretty narrow, if he is raising about 12% UTG(he might be adjusting because of the fish, though) pretty much the only Tx hand that villain could have is ATs and there are only 1 combo of it, TT is 1 combo as well and JJ,55 makes 6 combos. Since we don't have any read on his flop betsizing(like you said it just could be that he isn't good enough to realize that our calling range is quite inelastic), he could still have hands like AdKd, KdQd, AdQd and worse value combos KK,QQ.

Posted over 1 year ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

Time Link to 00:21:20

Do you hate just folding this flop blind vs blind with the Ah?

Posted over 1 year ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

Time Link to 00:25:58

Say you flat preflop CO vs BTN against the reg, would you be raise/getting it in on this flop?

Posted over 1 year ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

Time Link to 00:34:39

Isn't our cbet sizing a bit too big? I think I'd make it like 4$

Posted over 1 year ago

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

Do you hate just folding this flop blind vs blind with the Ah?



I think having Ah makes virtually no difference vs this type of player. If anything, it may even improve our implied odds.

Posted over 1 year ago

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

Say you flat preflop CO vs BTN against the reg, would you be raise/getting it in on this flop?



I don't really see the point of doing so in position. Villain would have to be stacking off extremely light extremely often.

Posted over 1 year ago

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

Isn't our cbet sizing a bit too big? I think I'd make it like 4$



Why? Sizing is totally fine/standard. I don't think betting smaller is going to induce anything here.

Posted over 1 year ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

Why? Sizing is totally fine/standard. I don't think betting smaller is going to induce anything here.


True, I totally brainfarted and thought it was a 4-bet pot.

Posted over 1 year ago

Branch10

Avatar for Branch10

583 posts
Joined 07/2010

I think having Ah makes virtually no difference vs this type of player. If anything, it may even improve our implied odds.


Sorry I didn't really formulate my question clearly. What I was trying to ask that when we have the Ah in our hand folding this flop is out of question, right? And if you float what would your plan be in some draw completing turns (heart, queen)?

Posted over 1 year ago

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

1150 posts
Joined 04/2008

Sorry I didn't really formulate my question clearly. What I was trying to ask that when we have the Ah in our hand folding this flop is out of question, right? And if you float what would your plan be in some draw completing turns (heart, queen)?



Call or check back, depending on the card. If he's betting we're probably going to have fold on a non-heart Q for example. Going to assume I have no FE vs this type of player unless I know differently.

Posted over 1 year ago




HomePoker ForumsSmall Stakes Shorthanded NL → Yin and Yang : Episode Fourteen