Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by blah234 (Micro/Small Stakes)

Apex Predator: Episode Two

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Apex Predator: Episode Two by blah234

Blah234 moves onto LAG theory, how to play properly, and pre-flop wars, how to set yourself up to succeed.

About Apex Predator Subscribe to

Say goodbye to ABC poker! Blah234 opens the door to the other side of "standard" poker and help you to become the apex predator at your tables. Learn how to turn other small stakes player's weaknesses into previously unreachable profits.

Tags

blah234 apex predator theory ipod friendly powerpoint classroom small-stakes

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 50 minutes long
  • Posted almost 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Apex Predator: Episode Two

or track by Email or RSS


Posiedon

Avatar for Posiedon

361 posts
Joined 07/2011

Something like that, didn't do the exactly math.



thnx man.....each one of your vids helps me a lot.

Posted over 1 year ago

DjuNKeLL

Avatar for DjuNKeLL

135 posts
Joined 05/2009

Let's say you know villain rarely calls 3bets OOP and is likely to 4b. IP villain is more likely to call 3bets. You should then use two different strategies (when villain is OOP; 3b/5b and when villain is IP; valuehands) on this specific villain right?

Posted over 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Let's say you know villain rarely calls 3bets OOP and is likely to 4b. IP villain is more likely to call 3bets. You should then use two different strategies (when villain is OOP; 3b/5b and when villain is IP; valuehands) on this specific villain right?



yes

Posted over 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

Time Link to 00:06:58

Great series so far blah234 Grin

You said that if villain is aggressive with a wide range from late position, we should be more inclined to call wider (from the blinds) so that any time we hit a pair we have good implied odds, because villain has a lot of air in his barrelling range and even if we play fit or fold it should still be +EV. But if we're defending a wider range, it means we have more air postflop, so won't we end up check folding most of the time and donating at least 1 bb?

Posted about 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Great series so far blah234 Grin

You said that if villain is aggressive with a wide range from late position, we should be more inclined to call wider (from the blinds) so that any time we hit a pair we have good implied odds, because villain has a lot of air in his barrelling range and even if we play fit or fold it should still be +EV. But if we're defending a wider range, it means we have more air postflop, so won't we end up check folding most of the time and donating at least 1 bb?



math question. If villain min raises and cbets like 70% of the times then we are basically calling 1bb to win like 5bb. We break even if we x/f 4/5 times. I'm fairly sure we can flop a hand more often than even if we play fit or fold and no one said we have to fold when we don't flop a pair.

Posted about 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

Doesn't playing fit or fold imply we only ever continue when we hit? So if we're playing back when we don't hit, we're not playing fit/fold.

Also if we hit something like bottom pair and villain is barrelling air a lot, we're likely to be ahead of his range as a whole but our equity might not be that great, in addition to us being oop it can make the hand very difficult to play. What is your approach in this scenario?

Posted about 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Doesn't playing fit or fold imply we only ever continue when we hit? So if we're playing back when we don't hit, we're not playing fit/fold.



right so if we can be +EV while playing fit or fold then it must be higher EV if we don't play fit or fold by finding right spots to play back


Also if we hit something like bottom pair and villain is barrelling air a lot, we're likely to be ahead of his range as a whole but our equity might not be that great, in addition to us being oop it can make the hand very difficult to play. What is your approach in this scenario?



put villain on a range and play. There's no one right way to do anything the general concept is that since we get good price even if we play fit or fold we can be +EV calling a wide range. so what if we're OOP? What can the guy IP do? Fact is people just say OOP is bad like a catch phrase and in reality very few players understand how to use position. This combined with the wide preflop ranges is why we can play back with fairly wide ranges even OOP.

This video series' target audience is small stakes players, I don't talk about how to play vs good players that understands position and knows how to use it well.

Posted about 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

Just had a thought - what can a player who understands position & uses it really well do that other players can't? Apply more pressure by betting/raising in position? But isn't this what most players do anyway?

Posted about 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Just had a thought - what can a player who understands position & uses it really well do that other players can't? Apply more pressure by betting/raising in position? But isn't this what most players do anyway?



why can't they apply pressure by bet/raising OOP? Same pressure IP as OOP with the same bet sizing.

Posted about 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

in reality very few players understand how to use position. This combined with the wide preflop ranges is why we can play back with fairly wide ranges even OOP.



I don't talk about how to play vs good players that understands position and knows how to use it well.



Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant what is it that these good players can do with position that an average SS reg can't?

From what you've said I'm assuming that against someone who does know how to use position well, calling oop with a wide range even if they open a wide range isn't profitable, but why?

Posted about 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant what is it that these good players can do with position that an average SS reg can't?

From what you've said I'm assuming that against someone who does know how to use position well, calling oop with a wide range even if they open a wide range isn't profitable, but why?



Short answer to first questions is they can construct ranges better and much harder for the guy OOP to be +EV. Long answer is too long for forum post and I suggest anyone who wants to learn this get their coach to teach it to them.

I don't understand your second question. Wide range is also relative, you obv shouldn't play a range wider than the pfr OOP in most cases. I'm pretty sure I said in the video that we can call a wider range of hands OOP compared to what the "standard" range is because most people don't know how to use position well.

Posted about 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

Short answer to first questions is they can construct ranges better and much harder for the guy OOP to be +EV. Long answer is too long for forum post and I suggest anyone who wants to learn this get their coach to teach it to them.

I don't understand your second question. Wide range is also relative, you obv shouldn't play a range wider than the pfr OOP in most cases. I'm pretty sure I said in the video that we can call a wider range of hands OOP compared to what the "standard" range is because most people don't know how to use position well.



You actually answered this in the first part of your reply Poke Tongue Calling a wider range against someone who does know how to use position well reduces the EV of the player oop, so they can't defend with the same range they could against an average player.

Posted about 1 year ago

stonehoof

Avatar for stonehoof

226 posts
Joined 01/2012

Short answer to first questions is they can construct ranges better and much harder for the guy OOP to be +EV. Long answer is too long for forum post and I suggest anyone who wants to learn this get their coach to teach it to them.



Did you learn this from your coach, or did it suddenly "click" at some point?

Posted about 1 year ago

blah234

Avatar for blah234

2464 posts
Joined 12/2009

Did you learn this from your coach, or did it suddenly "click" at some point?



I learn parts from coaches and other parts from videos then put all the pieces together and it "clicked"

Posted about 1 year ago




HomePoker ForumsSmall Stakes Shorthanded NL → Apex Predator : Episode Two