Anthony417
146 posts
Joined 02/2009
1BYONE
5156 posts
Joined 05/2009
I dont think that jamming the river is a good idea because Villain openR from UTG his really strong and the draw get there. I dont think we are beating his range on the river and he wont put you on a FD once you raised him on the turn. I dont think that Villain will be able to fold a PP (TT+) if you shove.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Anthony417
146 posts
Joined 02/2009
I dont think that jamming the river is a good idea because Villain openR from UTG his really strong and the draw get there. I dont think we are beating his range on the river and he wont put you on a FD once you raised him on the turn. I dont think that Villain will be able to fold a PP (TT+) if you shove.
yes basically my thoughts as well, he showed up with something i didnt expect but vs his range I felt we we're beat most of the time and wasn't a good spot to turn our hand into a bluff.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Manchild
Coach
1459 posts
Joined 01/2008
Joefish126
77 posts
Joined 11/2008
I'm curious why you decided to raise the turn. I don't see any better hands folding, unless you also shove the river, and your hand has plenty enough equity to call. I'd just call turn and unimproved probably fold the river if he bets
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Poemmel
813 posts
Joined 03/2009
MahatmaJ
364 posts
Joined 02/2009
Poemmel
813 posts
Joined 03/2009
If we are calling the turn instead of raising or folding,
are we intending to bet any river unimproved if checked to?
I would check behind most rivers unimproved I think.
He is raising UTG and 2 barreling such a board, not too many hands he could call us with that are worse.
Probably 78s and 98s, but he can still be easily check/calling 99+ on the river inducing a bluff from busted FDs, so I think it wouldn't be all too profitabe to be betting.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
MahatmaJ
364 posts
Joined 02/2009
I would check behind most rivers unimproved I think.
He is raising UTG and 2 barreling such a board, not too many hands he could call us with that are worse.
Probably 78s and 98s, but he can still be easily check/calling 99+ on the river inducing a bluff from busted FDs, so I think it wouldn't be all too profitabe to be betting.
My question really is if the river would be a good bluffspot if checked to since he probably would valuebet all strong hands and c/c medium hands if he views us as bluffy and c/f everything but his strong range if he views us as tight/nitty.
How about overbetting?
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Poemmel
813 posts
Joined 03/2009
I just don't see people c/folding an overpair on the river there.
Probably if the flush hits and we bet big, but even then they just talk themselves into a call too often.
Overbetting might be the only way to get him to fold an overpair, but even then people just don't like to fold when the FD busted.
I think it is a bad spot to bluff the river overall, if we would do it sometimes then either if the flush hits or with an overbet.
But Baluga would say getting people to fold overpairs is not the way we are making money 
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
MahatmaJ
364 posts
Joined 02/2009
Tackleberry
3429 posts
Joined 10/2009
MahatmaJ
364 posts
Joined 02/2009
rocketragz
3228 posts
Joined 11/2008
Poemmel
813 posts
Joined 03/2009
Why? In fear if being raised?
Its hard to get called by worse as an UTG raiser.
I mean would you be happy calling 3 streets w 8x,99, TT or JJ? I wouldn't ^^
And by checking he might induce busted FDs to bet, that can't call a bet obv.
Not too much of a problem gettin raised, we have an easy fold every time 
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote