hayes13
856 posts
Joined 12/2008
vegasmidas
169 posts
Joined 04/2010
bachis
408 posts
Joined 05/2009
vegasmidas
169 posts
Joined 04/2010
btw, i think c/r the flop is much better than leading out. Sure, if you lead out he might bluffraise you, but i think he calls a c/r with a much wider range that puts more money in later. (He would example call down with any flush on that turn, whereas he now can fold a flush on the river).
Posted almost 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
hayes13
856 posts
Joined 12/2008
CR flop has some merit, not that balance is the most important thing but i tend to lead quite a few low board if im calling oop at all.
Nice to be able to have some strong hands in my range.
also leading can also make the pot much bigger when villain has air and decides to raise, where as CR blows out all of his air.
Realized i dont have enough hands on button, but he looks like a reg.
maybe CR is better to stack JJ+.
but he might also raise them over my flop donk.
Posted almost 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Steppin Razor
Section 9
2237 posts
Joined 12/2009
I don't think a CR is going to get much value. The question is what he does on that flop with his weaker hands/bluffs.
I don't think leading like that accomplishes much other than give him a reason to fold air cheaply.
Posted almost 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
bachis
408 posts
Joined 05/2009
Prologion
2079 posts
Joined 03/2010
When BTN is not cbetting much, it has some merrits to lead on such lowcardBoards here in a decent freq. -> for Balance you also have then to donk sometimes monsters, but bigger.
But if BTN was cbetting a decent amount, I either C/R or C/Call.
If he is aggreesive on all streets, I like C/C Flop b/c he will barell ots of turns/rivers - reson: a C/Call range is here often weak.
+ you strenght in this way your C/Call-range on such boardtextures.
Posted almost 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote