Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by FenderJaguar (Micro/Small Stakes)

Mentor: FenderJaguar (#1) - 4-tabling Review

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Mentor: FenderJaguar (#1) - 4-tabling Review by FenderJaguar

FenderJaguar and his student do a video review of his play at 4 tables of 100NL.

About Mentor Subscribe to

DeucesCracked coaches Mentor their students in these coaching videos.

Tags

fenderjaguar 100nl 100 nl mentor 4-tabling

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 65 minutes long
  • Posted almost 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Mentor: FenderJaguar (#1) - 4-tabling Review

or track by Email or RSS


ricerice

Avatar for ricerice

4 posts
Joined 10/2009

Keruben

Avatar for Keruben

42 posts
Joined 09/2009

Fender on drugs. Thats five stars without even watching.

Posted almost 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

wowzers. I hope this came out OK. I was def hopped up on painkillers in the middle of my injury. I know we ended abruptly in the middle of a topic and I just want to let you guys know that we're going to do a fresh part 2 and cover that hand from the beginning of it, and I'm going to watch this one to get fresh on the material within. I'll also correct anything silly that I say that makes no sense or is totally ridiculous in this thread. Grin I hope it's still good!

Posted almost 3 years ago

Keruben

Avatar for Keruben

42 posts
Joined 09/2009

wowzers. I hope this came out OK. I was def hopped up on painkillers in the middle of my injury. I know we ended abruptly in the middle of a topic and I just want to let you guys know that we're going to do a fresh part 2 and cover that hand from the beginning of it, and I'm going to watch this one to get fresh on the material within. I'll also correct anything silly that I say that makes no sense or is totally ridiculous in this thread. Grin I hope it's still good!



Just to make sure i came across correctly it was definitly five stars also after watching. All very solid, its always great to get explained how to straight out your thought process in awkward spots.

Posted almost 3 years ago

spotDEspot

Avatar for spotDEspot

910 posts
Joined 06/2008

Time Link to 00:24:05

If we do call here (Td9d) and the turn is a complete blank (2c say), we are HU and he fires another 2/3 pot bet what is our plan? If the turn is an off-suit overcard? These spots always give me trouble when I take the passive line as I am never sure of the plan for the next streets.

Posted almost 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

If we do call here (Td9d) and the turn is a complete blank (2c say), we are HU and he fires another 2/3 pot bet what is our plan? If the turn is an off-suit overcard? These spots always give me trouble when I take the passive line as I am never sure of the plan for the next streets.



You mean the 9hTh hand where we have a pair/flush draw right? Grin Heads up I would prefer to raise the flop because I'm going to be raising that flop with a ton of hands unless he's a total nit w/cbets. Multiway I like the call for reasons mentioned. I would call HU sometimes though, like if I knew my opponent would never have me on a strong hand and would barrel like a monkey b/c he knows I always raise big draws/sets on the flop. That would be a reason to slowplay this and just call down.

If for some reason you were HU and did call the flop w/this hand w/no reason to believe he was a barreling monkey, I'd probably call again on the turn and play poker on the river, raising or jamming the turn with top pair isn't necessary. If we just had a combo FD or something it would make more sense because we could make better hands fold (hopefully!).

If I read what you were saying wrong and you meant we called the flop multiway and were HU on the turn, in that case I'd just call again on the turn for reasons mentioned in the previous paragraph. Hope this helps Grin

Posted almost 3 years ago

spotDEspot

Avatar for spotDEspot

910 posts
Joined 06/2008

You mean the 9hTh hand where we have a pair/flush draw right? Grin


Yep - the red ones Wink That was a quick fail but you got it...


If I read what you were saying wrong and you meant we called the flop multiway and were HU on the turn, in that case I'd just call again on the turn for reasons mentioned in the previous paragraph. Hope this helps Grin



Yes - this is what I meant sorry - not very clear. Answered anyway - thanks.

Posted almost 3 years ago

z324739

Avatar for z324739

Section 9
382 posts
Joined 03/2008

udownwithvpp

Avatar for udownwithvpp

1143 posts
Joined 04/2008

Was only gonna watch about 10 minutes of this while eating and ended up being hooked for the whole thing. The pain killers must give super analysis powers. Sick vid more plz.

Posted almost 3 years ago

Ebinsugewa

Avatar for Ebinsugewa

9 posts
Joined 01/2008

Thanks for the kind words all, we're gonna be doing a new one soon.

Posted almost 3 years ago

shades

Avatar for shades

847 posts
Joined 06/2008

Time Link to 00:50:15

AQ - How do you feel about c/c the turn ? Based on the last hand i think we are going with the read that he is a fishy guy so i wouldnt think hes looking at the ace as a good scarecard for us to barrel. I also think he calls such a dry flop with a very wide range so we give him a chance to bluff the turn if we c/c. I also dont think im getting value from much worse for 3 streets here , maybe some of his better Jx so i dont mind if he checks back the turn and i bomb the river. Even vs a TAG here given that we opened utg i think a check could be good since he shouldnt really be calling us with many bluffcatchers and even tho its a 'scarecard' we hit this card so much when we are utg. Maybe bet folding just makes the hand easier to play vs a fish and maybe TAGs just dont let go of bluffcatchers even when we are utg here. Thoughts ?

Posted almost 3 years ago

erby

Avatar for erby

180 posts
Joined 01/2009

Time Link to 00:56:19

the commentary here about getting called down on the river after overbet shoving by second pair is pure gold...

Posted almost 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

AQ - How do you feel about c/c the turn ? Based on the last hand i think we are going with the read that he is a fishy guy so i wouldnt think hes looking at the ace as a good scarecard for us to barrel. I also think he calls such a dry flop with a very wide range so we give him a chance to bluff the turn if we c/c. I also dont think im getting value from much worse for 3 streets here , maybe some of his better Jx so i dont mind if he checks back the turn and i bomb the river. Even vs a TAG here given that we opened utg i think a check could be good since he shouldnt really be calling us with many bluffcatchers and even tho its a 'scarecard' we hit this card so much when we are utg. Maybe bet folding just makes the hand easier to play vs a fish and maybe TAGs just dont let go of bluffcatchers even when we are utg here. Thoughts ?



I think he's going to be calling with more hands than will bet or bluff. Like if he called with Jx he's not betting, but def calling. If he has a draw he's prob calling or maybe betting, but likely always calling. I think betting is just better. Also we don't know if he's paying off 3 streets or not Smile Don't know until we try.

TAGS will definitely call you again sometimes. It depends on how wide they think you bet that turn. Depends on the TAG, some people are more suspicious/stubborn than others. In this hand it's less about making the hand easier to play and more about getting the most value in a vacuum.

Posted almost 3 years ago

bortman1

Avatar for bortman1

2 posts
Joined 10/2009

Fender, you talk soooo much. YOu can explain things a lot faster, that 9,10 suited hand went on for way too long sir.

Posted almost 3 years ago




HomePoker ForumsSmall Stakes Shorthanded NL → Mentor : FenderJaguar (#1) - 4-tabling Review