Do you change your play deep with AA against a maniac, or do you just shovel it in?
The villain's playing 87/50 over 8 hands. He's potting all the time and winning most hands without showdown.
I looked back in the history and noted that his first hand was the only non-maniac hand he played, so I missed it at the time. He had AKQ2ds in the SB, didn't raise pf, flopped KQ with the nfd and a backdoor fd, and slowplayed it 5 way including min betting when the flush hit. His play is a disaster.
$0.50/$1 Pot Limit Omaha Hi, 5 Players
Hero (UTG) ($281.38)
CO ($188.14)
BTN ($286.50)
SB ($300)
BB ($314.09)
Pre-Flop: ($1.50, 5 players) Hero is UTG 8
A
J
A
Hero raises to $3.50, 1 fold, BTN calls $3.50, SB raises to $10, 1 fold, Hero raises to $34.50, BTN folds, SB calls $24.50
Flop: 3
10
2
($73, 2 players)
SB bets $36.75, Hero calls $36.75
Turn: K
($146.50, 2 players)
SB bets $147, Hero goes all-in $210.13, SB calls $63.13
I was way outside of my known territory with this hand. The 4 bet preflop, for instance, though it's a clear value raise against his range, it's still only 10% of my stack. Is raising worth the (large) value if I give away my hand? Once the flop comes T32r, do you at that point decide that you are playing for stacks, even though you the psr is like 4 and you have over 200bb behind?
