BillGatesIII
5 posts
Joined 08/2011
5carab
928 posts
Joined 07/2010
If you have any stats on the CO they might be worth posting (a super high VPIP still likely means something). Without, I'm not 100% comfortable with the 3-bet 'cas I hate 3-betting OOP in general, but I think it's probably fine given how coordinated you are. Once you've done it, I see no choice but to bet/get it in here. You have the second nuts with a backdoor flush draw and we can expect him to show up wider than just 9T (big draws and other sets are AT LEAST in his range, and potentially a lot more depending on how aggro villain is). Well played imo.
Posted 12 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
AAKKds
183 posts
Joined 12/2011
I like the 3Bet if villain is opening a fairly wide range from the CO, but this is Zoom so there's not a dynamic built up. I would probably flat this hand because the flush value isn't the greatest and your value from this hand is flopping a set and getting it in vs. weaker sets and two pair etc. Also, you are closing the action so there's no need to get it HU or anything like that. This hand also doesn't flop (to use DJ's words) pieces very well ie you're going to miss a lot of flops and a lot of them will be hard to play OOP, especially when you're flushes/FDs get a lot of action.
As played, I'd B/F. This is Zoom, so people are probably playing tighter and I don't think someone is going to pot raise a pair plus flush draw, especially since you block top pair/top two. T9 is also in a lot of hands people call 3Bets with (rundowns like 789T, 9TJK).
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
slycebu
883 posts
Joined 09/2009
5carab
928 posts
Joined 07/2010
No way we can fold. Against T9** we're just over 38%. We're the same vs. AKT* w/ hearts meaning we break even if that's their entire range. Include the occasional flush draw w/ just a gutter or JJ** etc. and we do really well. Bet/fold is a sizeable mistake imo.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BillGatesIII
5 posts
Joined 08/2011
Teahupoo
1254 posts
Joined 07/2009
Agree with the above that it's a super easy bet/get-it-in but I really dislike the 3-bet and would much rather flat. This hand actually hits flops pretty poorly despite being double suited and we are OOP with no reads at all on villain. There just aren't that many flops we're happy to play for stacks on. Reads could change this decision for me but I'd want a much more coordinated hand to 3-bet SB vs an unknown CO.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shuttle
3332 posts
Joined 11/2008
AAKKds
183 posts
Joined 12/2011
slycebu
883 posts
Joined 09/2009
Don't mean to derail, but if it's not an imposition, some follow up q's on deepstacked play for this hand (I rarely play deeper than 250bb's, I'm pretty clueless - I'm assuming the same readless situation):
1. How deep do we need to be to play this as b/c rather than getting it in on the flop?
2. What's the plan for the rest of the hand if we b/c flop?
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote