Buzz
286 posts
Joined 09/2008
delcrossb
4185 posts
Joined 04/2009
Teahupoo
1084 posts
Joined 07/2009
I would call and fold diamonds, and plan to evaluate his play on 2's and 7's.
In my much more limited experience, I usually fold this to the player described. Is that a leak? I do this because we have no redraw or sidecards we want to hit and we're against a very strong range. We can't get it in here with these stacks and I'd feel lost on the 'brick' turns and he fires. I think this would only be a profitable call if we had a good read on his postflop game and were willing to bluff on any sign of hesitation on the turn.
Let`s say we call and he checks a 7 or a
. We then bet and it sort of turns into a weird range merge. We could now be either bluffing or value-betting and not really know it. He`s certainly narrowed his range by check-calling, but we`re then going to have to `bluff` a ton of rivers.
More often than not though, we are faced with a super tough decision on the turn for a near pot-sized bet on what is supposed to be a brick. I just feel that I would give myself a lot of room for mistakes on the turn with these stacks, so I bail on the flop in what is probably a very marginal spot to begin with. I can see arguments for calling though if you have a solid read and sick post-flop game.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
delcrossb
4185 posts
Joined 04/2009
When we have top two pair in a raised pot his range is fairly narrow. There is only one combo of top set possible and he probably isn't playing 66 or 33. Therefore a lot of his hands are going to be draws that he is c/r trying to get fold equity. Expect to see diamonds+gutter/OESD or pair+diamonds a lot. With position I think we can play pretty well vs. a range that is largely consisting of FD's.
We also have a nut gutshot and a lot of money behind which makes me even happier to peel.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
HRPaperstacks
2048 posts
Joined 07/2009
In my much more limited experience, I usually fold this to the player described. Is that a leak?
As I am often in the role of Villain here, trust me, what delcross says is right on the money. Typical scenario for me after I x/r with a big combo draw (like I might have Ad5d4c3c on that flop) is that the guy IP flats and I brick the turn, like Ts. Now what? If IP player peeled only with top-pair, he probably has two-pair now and I'm behind. If I check, he's gonna bet. If I bet, he might raise and force me to fold before I realize my equity. Let's say I barrel and he calls and I brick again. Unless I can bluff him off the river, he's going to collect a nice pot just by letting me hang myself.
After being on the receiving end of that a dozen or so times and studying what those IP Villains did, I've been flatting my crappy two-pair and playing my position, usually pretty passively, with good results. The only time it blows up on me is on a drawy flop where I have top/bottom or mid/bottom and put Villain on a combo draw, when in fact he has a set or top-two.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
rrumsey
4394 posts
Joined 06/2010
Teahupoo
1084 posts
Joined 07/2009
Leak plugged. Makes total sense. I completely failed to recognize just how narrow his range is with simple card removal, and that flush/combo draws are easily the most common holding for him to have here. Something I don't think of enough in game. Nice points too, HR. Another great example of just how much position owns.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Buzz
286 posts
Joined 09/2008
Villain could easily make better two pair when overcards come.
If we peel and villain barrels on what looks like blank (Ts), are we just giving up?
I guess read on villain's aggression is most helpful.
Adding aggression to nice combo draws can put bad two pair hands on defensive.
If I had the combo draw in villain's position I would probably bet turn and stack off.
Sorry for the late reply.
I am actually in Vegas right now.
I am looking for PLO game but most games play big.
I might go visit Venetian and play their 1/2/5 game.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote