papifeo
84 posts
Joined 02/2009
The two villains in the pot are tight aggressive and they seem to be thinking players even though this is micro stakes. Should i take there checks on the river for weakness? I want to steal this big pot on the river with air. With the board pairing on the end should i represent the full house?
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 4 players - View hand 44614
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Hero (CO): $8.77
BTN: $4.83
SB: $20.19
BB: $3.00
Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with 5
A
K
6 
Hero calls $0.02, 1 fold, SB raises to $0.08, BB calls $0.06, Hero calls $0.06
Flop: ($0.24) 8
2
T
(3 players)
SB bets $0.24, BB calls $0.24, Hero calls $0.24
Turn: ($0.96) 3
(3 players)
SB checks, BB bets $0.96, Hero calls $0.96, SB calls $0.96
River: ($3.84) 3
(3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero?
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
n0whereman
2856 posts
Joined 01/2008
papifeo
84 posts
Joined 02/2009
n0whereman
2856 posts
Joined 01/2008
papifeo
84 posts
Joined 02/2009
just to be sure, this is a joke right?
No its not a joke. If your a math guy tell me what the odds of you hitting a flush if you have missed 3 flush draws in a row and are trying to make the flush on the 4th try ? Is it not better then 2 to 1? Sorry IM not trying to size you up your the pro and im just a lonely microstakes player just trying to get better.
What about my river bet is it even worth making? or is it -EV?
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
n0whereman
2856 posts
Joined 01/2008
No its not a joke. If your a math guy tell me what the odds of you hitting a flush if you have missed 3 flush draws in a row and are trying to make the flush on the 4th try ? Is it not better then 2 to 1? Sorry IM not trying to size you up your the pro and im just a lonely microstakes player just trying to get better.
What about my river bet is it even worth making? or is it -EV?
your odds of hitting a flush this time have absolutely nothing to do with what has happened in previous hands. knowing that every hand is an independent trial (ie previous hands don't dictate current odds/hands/whatever) is a very important concept to understand.
as for your river bet, it might be very slightly +EV, but a bet of $1 is more likely to fold out hands like 8xxx that will probably call your super tiny river bet. tbh you probably had the best hand.
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
papifeo
84 posts
Joined 02/2009
your odds of hitting a flush this time have absolutely nothing to do with what has happened in previous hands. knowing that every hand is an independent trial (ie previous hands don't dictate current odds/hands/whatever) is a very important concept to understand.
keep thinking that.
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
n0whereman
2856 posts
Joined 01/2008
your odds of hitting a flush this time have absolutely nothing to do with what has happened in previous hands. knowing that every hand is an independent trial (ie previous hands don't dictate current odds/hands/whatever) is a very important concept to understand.
keep thinking that.
you disagree?
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Entity
8075 posts
Joined 11/2006
keep thinking that.
n0whereman is right; each hand is a completely independent event. Thoughts like "playing your rush" or "I have to hit because I haven't hit in hours" are part of the Gambler's fallacy. You may feel "due," but that has no impact on what will happen, or what the proper play is in this case.
Based on my PLO experience, what n0whereman has said here so far is correct; folding the turn is going to be correct as a "default" play, as you're getting 2:1 immediate odds but you only have 12 true outs, and you have a player behind you who may checkraise making your odds worse overall.
Rob
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
papifeo
84 posts
Joined 02/2009
i respect your philosophy but i have been using this one for about 2 years now and it has been working for me. you might want to rethink things over. this is some advanced stuff. im not sure if you will ever believe it though. run some test simulations and let me know what u find out.
Posted over 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
dundersten
1 posts
Joined 02/2009
The reason you are seeing this the wrong way papifeo is that you are thinking of lining up 4 hands and then what are the chances of 4 flushdraws missed (say you have 40% each time), 6/10^4. That dont mean that each hand is not individually 40%, the odds for each hand never change!
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
singlestar
7 posts
Joined 08/2008
i respect your philosophy but i have been using this one for about 2 years now and it has been working for me. you might want to rethink things over. this is some advanced stuff. im not sure if you will ever believe it though. run some test simulations and let me know what u find out.
if its worked why are you still at the penny tables?
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote