Columbo
64 posts
Joined 01/2012
5carab
928 posts
Joined 07/2010
This is completely fine so long as you call. I 3-bet slightly smaller here (see comments on another of your threads), but your 3-bet is less than pot and has certainly meant his 4-bet w/ AAxx (pretty much all he has here w/o significant info to the contrary) isn't as large as he'd want it to be making our IP call very profitable.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Schweig
1194 posts
Joined 10/2008
I don't 3-bet a guy opening UTG with 14 PFR generally - I don't think it really creates any value with any hand besides AA and if you only do it with AA I think it becomes too transparent.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Columbo
64 posts
Joined 01/2012
I don't 3-bet a guy opening UTG with 14 PFR generally - I don't think it really creates any value with any hand besides AA and if you only do it with AA I think it becomes too transparent.
Yes, I also thought flatting would be better when I reviewed it.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Osterror
116 posts
Joined 11/2011
snarble5
1685 posts
Joined 07/2010
slycebu
883 posts
Joined 09/2009
Trying to see if I'm gettting the reason(s) for flatting, since my kneejerk reaction is to 3!/call.
Am I overvaluing trying to get HU in position (i.e. trying to get the blinds to fold better spade draws) in 3betting even against the strong narrow UTG range? Or am I happier playing this hand multiway in position, so I don't really care if they come along since I'm going to be very picky anyway about flops I play strongly against the UTG range?
If double suited, would this be a 3! then?
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Schweig
1194 posts
Joined 10/2008
When you 3bet versus a tight and strong UTG range you are just building a pot without any real equity advantage. Sure, it allows you to win it on some flops you wouldn't have and disguises your 3-betting range somewhat (sort of in that it's a non AA hand except not really because people expect you to 3bet these types of hand so people will still be somewhat worried if the board came T98).
However, you just end up playing gamble gamble when your opponent does have AA** or decided to 4bet some sort of broadway hand for stacks which is not in your favour.
Also, this hand is not actually that amazing when you take it up against a strong range, because your opponents will still put you on the bad end of the 60/40 when you flop pieces and get it in.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Osterror
116 posts
Joined 11/2011
Hmm.. A few questions to make it sure I got this right:
- since this is a premium non AA hand, we are not 3-betting at all then? and we flat even premium aces, since 3 betting only aces is not a good idea versus a reg?
- don't we lose quite a lot of value this way?
- I don't mind gambling vs aces with this hand when he often puts his money in bad otf and we can often get away?
- I don't think PFR 14% is that tight. I think I'm about 14% myself and would LOVE it if a reg on the button would never 3-bet my UTG raises 
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Schweig
1194 posts
Joined 10/2008
I generally don't 3-bet at all in this spot and flat AA a lot too. We don't lose that much value because when the pot is small and you have position good things can happen too, plus it lowers variance too because you have to bet/call it off on the flop so much.
Sure you don't mind gambling versus aces but at the same time it's still a situation which is overall -EV for you. You don't mind because by the time you are 4-bet there is dead money in there but you make two calls because of pot odds essentially.
Even with the added value of getting away flops you probably still winding up coming out badly from this sitaution because you actually trade up being able to get away with the fact that you don't get to see 5 cards all the time. Plus he doesn't really put money in that bad OTF that much because the stacks are so short postflop you have to either call every time you flop just a pair, like Q45 flop.
He's 14% PFR overall though; we would be better off knowing his positional PFR stats but generally his UTG open will be a lot lower.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote