Poker Video: MTT/SNG by AMT (Mid Stakes)

MTT: AMT (#9) - 6-tabling MTTs

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

MTT: AMT (#9) - 6-tabling MTTs by AMT

AMT 6 tables MTTs while discussing mainly early and mid session play at these mid/high stakes tournaments.

About MTT Subscribe to

For all those moments when you are sitting down to an event with more than 9 players our Instructors help you with the decisions to cull out the weak and make the final table.

Tags

amt mtt push 6-tabling video review

Video Details

  • Game: mttsng
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 50 minutes long
  • Posted over 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for MTT: AMT (#9) - 6-tabling MTTs

or track by Email or RSS


Slickity

Avatar for Slickity

118 posts
Joined 01/2009

Time Link to 00:30:37

vs crisbus on table 6, you checked back the flop. You commented about saying you should cbet here but didn't. Do you have a thought on why you did that in game or was it just an error in judgment at the time? I agree that it should be a pretty standard cbet spot, seeing as we could get floated by some worse ace highs and we could also get pocket pairs 22, 44-77 to fold.

On the last hand w/ the 99, I don't think he could really rep anything either given how passively he played the hand to that point. He had to think that you're calling down with all your Ace highs or you're bluff catching the bad run out, because like you said you can't rep much value and betting would just put you in a bunch of stupid spots even if you did have a hand like JJ or KK there and for some reason didn't bet the turn.

Posted over 2 years ago

AMT

Avatar for AMT

2021 posts
Joined 01/2008

vs crisbus on table 6, you checked back the flop. You commented about saying you should cbet here but didn't. Do you have a thought on why you did that in game or was it just an error in judgment at the time? I agree that it should be a pretty standard cbet spot, seeing as we could get floated by some worse ace highs and we could also get pocket pairs 22, 44-77 to fold.

On the last hand w/ the 99, I don't think he could really rep anything either given how passively he played the hand to that point. He had to think that you're calling down with all your Ace highs or you're bluff catching the bad run out, because like you said you can't rep much value and betting would just put you in a bunch of stupid spots even if you did have a hand like JJ or KK there and for some reason didn't bet the turn.



No I don't really know why I checked back in-game, lots of reasons possible for little mistakes like that. I know I had a couple other tables going off screen, and that AQo re-shove spot popped up at the same time so I might have gotten distracted, or just relied on getting to a cheap showdown or something and took the pansy line. I think it was probably just a lazy check back, happens sometimes. I don't think he'll fold any pairs on the flop but getting him off chops or hands like QJ that will still have reasonable pot equity/him calling with worse ace highs or FDs or w/e still makes it a reasonably standard spot. Wouldn't do it with 100% frequency or anything though, so we can pretend it was one of those other times Poke Tongue

And yeah the 99 spot was pretty standard, realized he was probably just thinking what I was thinking about his hand. Was planning to cut the video before the hand as you could probably tell but wanted to squeeze in some explanation just cause it was another hand where I got to showdown with a reg and figured showing everyone as many hands as possible was reasonable.


edit: and sorry for those that wanted a continuation of this video, I really don't have one prepared, this was just more a random review of a chunk of play. Apologies if that's a let down, but if you want a more structured multi-part review, I can do that for the future (but there's another vid that's already been put in that was recorded a while ago so it won't be immediately!)

Posted over 2 years ago

Slickity

Avatar for Slickity

118 posts
Joined 01/2009

Thank A, I figured it was fluke at the time but since it pertained to the rest of your analysis of the hand I figured I'd ask.

As for the video, I liked the format a lot and think you did a good job on it. I hope you continue to do things like this. Also, I hope you continue to get some run good in.

Posted over 2 years ago

notunwell

Avatar for notunwell

77 posts
Joined 05/2009

Uninc158

Avatar for Uninc158

439 posts
Joined 08/2008

Maybe its camtasia or whatever, but i notice in this you have two mice on the screen, i was wondering how you do this.

Posted over 2 years ago

AMT

Avatar for AMT

2021 posts
Joined 01/2008

Maybe its camtasia or whatever, but i notice in this you have two mice on the screen, i was wondering how you do this.




As far as I know, it's just the recording. I had pre-recorded the actual play, and dubbed over with the audio some days later, so you'll probably see both the mouse taking action at the tables, and then the one I'm moving around while I'm indicating the spots in review/futzing with the mouse when I'm talking through hands and the like.

Posted over 2 years ago

etium

Avatar for etium

2 posts
Joined 02/2008

This video seems to be fubared now, with all kinds of green and purple static. Not sure if it's the video itself or my browser, but the rest of the videos on the site seem to be just fine.

Posted over 2 years ago

AMT

Avatar for AMT

2021 posts
Joined 01/2008

This video seems to be fubared now, with all kinds of green and purple static. Not sure if it's the video itself or my browser, but the rest of the videos on the site seem to be just fine.




It's working fine for me. Might be your flash settings or flash updates needed? I had a problem with green and purple static on videos before I updated my flash stuff, but if it's still not working repost here or probably best in the main forums (research and dev. or something) to make sure Rob or another techie on the team sees it and is able to prompt in the right direction.

Posted about 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsTournament Poker → MTT : AMT (#9) - 6-tabling MTTs