Tournament Poker Poker Forums

Is this common is super turbos? Feedback greatly appreciated.(AMT, Bones, Vandweller Preferably lol)


ktpyro81

Avatar for ktpyro81

101 posts
Joined 05/2008

So I played a session today and my results were horrible over ~300 tourneys. I guess I don't understand how to interpret this graph. Can someone please elaborate on what I can learn from it? Thanks!

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/6045/tourneyz.jpg

Posted almost 2 years ago

JtX

Avatar for JtX

621 posts
Joined 12/2009

You would have been at a bit profit if you would have run like you should be in All-In situations, but now you lost a bit. Nothing magical or mythical about it. As super turbos are more about All-In situations than normal tournaments, the red graph should be a bit more accurate. Run seems completely standard to me.

Posted almost 2 years ago

corkeye

Avatar for corkeye

833 posts
Joined 08/2009

yeh basically yr getting it all-in good and not winning the showdowns.

This is over a very, very small sample remember, so expect the two lines to eventually get closer. And... keep getting it in good.

Posted almost 2 years ago

ktpyro81

Avatar for ktpyro81

101 posts
Joined 05/2008

Okay so I finished my session and I updated the graph. This is just running bad per se right? I ended up playing 424 tournaments yesterday.


http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/9581/tournements.jpg

Posted almost 2 years ago

vandweller

Avatar for vandweller

467 posts
Joined 12/2008

Go to the Sharkscope leaderboards for your game and stakes. Look at the graphs. That will give you an idea of what is possible variance-wise for even the winningest players.

Posted almost 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsTournament Poker → Is this common is super turbos? Feedback greatly appreciated.(AMT, Bones, Vandweller Preferably lol)