stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
DwelF
891 posts
Joined 10/2009
This looks very cool, my current application of multistreet EV is mostly based on folding abit more OOP with made hands (medium PPs, medium pair etc) when the opponent barrels a reasonable amount.
Atleast this is my own understanding without watching the vid yet, can't really think of any other applications in my game currently.
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shuttle
3333 posts
Joined 11/2008
dcart
319 posts
Joined 01/2011
Awesome! I am a pretty maths adverse kind of guy, and having reached a sticking point with my study, i realised i needed to look at EV in more detail.
I made this thread asking about calculating fold equity, http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/8-Micro-Stakes-Online-NL/542061-Check-my-Maths and Entity has provided some equations that i have been using.
Although he uses a different method i think it comes to the same idea of your first simple EV calc example. Of course then you go into the nested EV calc, where i did become a little lost 
This morning i was trying to work out different EVs of barreling a high card vs a brick on the turn given his flop calling range, and the amount of variables was overwhelming.
I guess video two will be looking at Cardrunners EV?
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
This looks very cool, my current application of multistreet EV is mostly based on folding abit more OOP with made hands (medium PPs, medium pair etc) when the opponent barrels a reasonable amount.
Atleast this is my own understanding without watching the vid yet, can't really think of any other applications in my game currently.
I'll be interested in hearing feedback to see how the approach in the videos is different...
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
I guess video two will be looking at Cardrunners EV?
There will be a sort of Video 1.5 that will look at Flopzilla and what we can do with it.
Then yes... Vid 2 (and possibly 3 depending on how long it takes) will be all about making these concepts work for us in Cardrunners EV and how to handle the data we get out of CRev to improve our game.
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
Of course then you go into the nested EV calc, where i did become a little lost 
This morning i was trying to work out different EVs of barreling a high card vs a brick on the turn given his flop calling range, and the amount of variables was overwhelming.
I guess video two will be looking at Cardrunners EV?
I recommend checking out the first 3 videos of "Running The Streets" for more information on how nested EV calculations work.
But it's simpler than it sounds anyway...
1) You're using an EV calculation to model the flop.
2) Unfortunately one of the unknowns in that equation is your "Pot Equity".
3) I assert in the video that when there is still money behind you cannot know your "Pot Equity" without also modelling future streets.
4) What do we model future streets with?
5) Answer = Another EV calculation dedicated to modelling the turn.
6) The turn EV calculation is an equation with the unknown "Turn Pot Equity".
7) If there's still yet more money behind then you cannot know your "Turn Pot Equity" without modelling the river.
8) So... you use yet another EV calculation dedicated to modelling the river.
I) solve the river EV calc
II) use that to feed into your turn EV calc
III) solve your turn EV calc
IV) use that to feed into your flop EV calc (the one you really cared about all this time...)
V) finally solve that damn flop EV calc!
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
Awesome! I am a pretty maths adverse kind of guy
Me too!
I actually played some live pokerz over a year ago VS Shuttle...
(yeah some stellar table selection on my part obviously)
...and afterwards he was talking about Cardrunners EV (It was Stox EV back then IIRC)
I thought it was interesting but I figured it was one of those tools for the math geniuses and I wouldn't get it... so I didn't pursue it any further.
But trust me as long as you have an understanding of what you're doing and why it matters... which is what I'm trying to lay the ground work on now...then the process of using CRev is very lucid.
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shuttle
3333 posts
Joined 11/2008
I think the big thing even if you aren't particularly interested in Mathematics is just having precise thinking. I see a ton of people who are just clearly being too vague and it really hurts their game. The reason I think cardrunnersEV is good for many people is because it forces you to think precisely, the tool doesn't do anything really if you aren't precise. As in you can't tell cardrunnersEV to do something vague, you have to be precise to be able to use it at all. Just thinking about the possible contingencies on the future streets is going to be hugely beneficial.
Posted 9 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010
Entity
8050 posts
Joined 11/2006
FaceMyAlterEgo
374 posts
Joined 07/2010
Estist
1037 posts
Joined 09/2010
stanmore
3509 posts
Joined 03/2010