---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by KRANTZ (High Stakes)

Pr1nnyraiding 3 coming out ? For real ? So so so cooool

Time Link to 00:49:29

Flagellation

Hey Krantz enjoyed the match. It seems like IFS epitomizes the new more aggro mid-high stakes reg. Did you feel like you had an edge in this match or do you feel like your out of touch with what it takes to win in today's mid-high stakes HU games?

Hey Krantz enjoyed the match. It seems like IFS epitomizes the new more aggro mid-high stakes reg. Did you feel like you had an edge in this match or do you feel like your out of touch with what it takes to win in today's mid-high stakes HU games?

i am def not that out of touch

I doubt you have an edge though hehe

oh and gg, wp etc. Was fun watching

I doubt you have an edge though hehe

oh and gg, wp etc. Was fun watching

lol that's why i like you!

gg

I doubt you have an edge though hehe

oh and gg, wp etc. Was fun watching

haha. .

Krantz/IFS - you know anything about Baluga's match with IFS that he recorded?

haha. .

Krantz/IFS - you know anything about Baluga's match with IFS that he recorded?

he's working on analyzing it with FoxwoodsFiend, will most likely be out sometime in late April or early May

he's working on analyzing it with FoxwoodsFiend, will most likely be out sometime in late April or early May

awesome

Great video one question thought...why u kept pot sizing against such an aggresive opponent?wouldnt be cheaper to diminish ur sizing at some spots?

why not lead?

Because you aren't representing anything that you want to go all-in, which means that a player like ifs will raise you on either the turn or the river leaving you with nothing but a fold when you don't hit your straight.

Because you aren't representing anything that you want to go all-in, which means that a player like ifs will raise you on either the turn or the river leaving you with nothing but a fold when you don't hit your straight.

just because something might happen doesn't mean you should pass on an aggressive action, especially when the turn or river raise isn't coming very often at all (he only has so many combos of value raising hands and needs to remain somewhat balanced with his bluffs)

even if you aren't balanced with yours?

Time Link to 00:37:59

Table 1 folded 2nd pair to a double barrel without much thought. Against an oppenent this aggressive, is this correct here?