---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by DOGISHEAD (Micro/Small Stakes)

Can someone provide a full fold equity calculation here? I get a different number:

36.6 equity means we lose $26.8 when we are called (100 * 0.366 - 100 * (1-0.366))

x = how often he folds
$38*x - 26.8*(1-x) = 0 (to find how often he needs to fold for us to be break even)
solving gives us
x = 0.41

so we're breaking even if villain folds 41% of the time. Did i get this wrong?

exactly the kind of video I joined DC for. Keep it up

you guys should finish the series off ultimate fighter style, a vid of coach for coach HU for the last epsiode

V good vid

theory vids have been awesome (and thats not to take anythin away from the liveplay one)

If u did a series exactly like this but 6max next season, I would pay double

Sick series.
This episodes just blow off my head and at some point, I had to
stop to take notes...That's usually a good signal ;-)

ty guys, can't wait till next wesneday

These theory ones beat the live play by a mile. The work yous are putting in really shows i want season 2 6max then season 3 FR and you can have a break then

Can someone provide a full fold equity calculation here?

EV = (calling frequency)*(avg. amount won when he calls) + (folding frequency)*(amount won when he folds)

Calling frequency is just 1-(folding frequency). The avg won when he calls is (equity)*(size of pot) - (bet size), and when he folds we win the dead money in the pot. So,

EV = (1 - FE)*(E*200 - 89) + FE*38

Setting EV=0 and solving for FE gives us (89-E*200)/(127-E*200), or about 29 percent.

Oh, and this is my favorite series so far and I don't even play HU. Good work guys!

your theoretical vids for me now are as important as pr1nnyraiding series at that time. thank u so much
really really great series!
and it'd be nice to see you guys playing against each other in ep.8 or maybe in bonus ep.9 (;

Great video series, especially the theory videos. I think the theory videos are the more efficient way to learn poker. Thanks for all the hard work, it definitely shows.

I totally have to agree with whats been said so far. This really is an amazing piece of poker-art!

Hey Dog,

Can you give some examples of when bet-folding would be the optimum play instead of checking for pot control.

Great series btw, I got a lot out of your duel vids, so I knew you wouldn't disappoint.

Awesome, and I don't bandy out praise that easily. It's quite amazing how rational and easy you guys make it look.
Really enjoyed the bluff calculation and has left me looking at bluffing in a different way.
Also the combination of pairs mentioned by gman was an eye opener. Roll on next week, I'm really looking forward to learning about manipulating my bet sizing. Something I have been trying out as of late.

Dogisheadisgod

lol, when dog was high he thought dogishead was an anagram of god is dead.

great vids!

Great series!

Both of you guys have amazing ability of articulating your thought process!

you guys should finish the series off ultimate fighter style, a vid of coach for coach HU for the last epsiode

yes

All posters in the poker forums should watch the "concrete analysis" part.

Awesome vid guys!

Hey vid dudes...When I downloaded the ipod version it stops playing after about 10 min.......Can anything be done about that???

Thanks,

F

I approve of this series

I am getting the fold equity of the 44 hand to be 20.8%.
I calculated as follows, please help me where I went wrong.
ALL in EV = (38+89)(0.366) - (89)(0.634) = $-10. so on average we lose 10 dollars when we make this play and he calls every time, with the range given.

To calculate fold equity, let fold equity = x,when he folds we win $38 and when he calls we lose on average $10. Equate to 0 to find the break even point.
x(38) - (1-x)(10) = 0
From the above calculation i get the fold equity equal to 0.208 or 20.8%.

Please let me know where I made my mistake.

exactly the kind of video I joined DC for. Keep it up

Same here, this dog guy is fantastic to say the least

Wow I guess I am the only one that is kind of EH about this one. I love the series so far, and I come from a math background. But I think this would have been alot better if you had actual hand examples and how they played out, especially on the bluff calculations. I so see the value in much of this, I just don't see many players calculating this on the fly, if any. The math is great, but I think it gets lost as a math class and not so much on really applying it to actual play.

Just a quick note, you can make a HUD just for HU play, if you go into HEM there are filter options for amt of players and which HUD to use. So you can use a separate HUD for HU, 6m and even FR.

Please fix iPod version. Sound dies at 37:45min. Thanks

Please fix iPod version. Sound dies at 37:45min. Thanks

I have fixed the ipod version.
-Rusty