---

Poker Video: Misc/Other by DeathDonkey (Micro/Small Stakes)

Time Link to 00:03:31

having played a ton of 1/2TD in the past and against some of these players i would flat and draw 3 again here. i agree w/ delcrossb that you arent going to get jammed very often and you are getting a great price.

This was easily the most flustered I've ever been playing poker, sorry if I acted strangely during this vid. I had no idea what it was like to be coached (despite having coached plenty of students myself) and was struggling to listen, observe, and play. It was fun though

Time Link to 00:30:58

really betting a 96542 in 1:1 on the turn is thin DD?

fun vid guys. ty

re: 8543x near the end. i would 3bet vs most at 1/2, they just wont put much pressure on you or snow enough so you can play pretty well vs them. they generally call too much otr aswell, so we get value even when we make 87543 straight away. also, its fun to play more pots vs bad players

Will be checking this one out soon!

Time Link to 00:26:00

I think when the BB reraises our lead and draws 1 after 1st goes 2:2 he has a wheel draw a lot of the time. Given that, I think when we make #5 after 2nd and lead, if we are reraised, its more of a crying call down then a 3-bet for value.

Time Link to 00:27:53

The BB went from 3 to Pat when he C/R'ed after the 1st draw. UTG with his 86543 seems like an easy 3-bet for value/force button out of the pot after getting faced with the C/R.

Folding at any point against BB seems ridiculous to me.

Time Link to 00:35:35

Whats the worse hand we should be 3-betting for value here? I feel like with a lot of 86s, we gain more from just taking a passive and having villain pat some breakable 87s and bet our hand for us. This is of course assuming we expect villain to be pat here the majority of the time when he reraises us after we lead.

really betting a 96542 in 1:1 on the turn is thin DD?

Sure I mean taking 96 up against a 1 card draw with 2 cracks at it we are like a little better than even money, I'd call that thin. Not to say there is another way to play the hand really.

I think when the BB reraises our lead and draws 1 after 1st goes 2:2 he has a wheel draw a lot of the time. Given that, I think when we make #5 after 2nd and lead, if we are reraised, its more of a crying call down then a 3-bet for value.

Yeah agree, good point

The BB went from 3 to Pat when he C/R'ed after the 1st draw. UTG with his 86543 seems like an easy 3-bet for value/force button out of the pot after getting faced with the C/R.

Folding at any point against BB seems ridiculous to me.

Shrug most of these guys are just super passive so his CR bet bet despite being 3 to pat just seemed strong. I agree he should normally 3 bet on the flop but after that I don't mind his play, lose a little less when beat and don't let the guy break.

Whats the worse hand we should be 3-betting for value here? I feel like with a lot of 86s, we gain more from just taking a passive and having villain pat some breakable 87s and bet our hand for us. This is of course assuming we expect villain to be pat here the majority of the time when he reraises us after we lead.

Agreed, probably num 6 or num 7 is a fine cut off point

Time Link to 00:32:31

At lowstakes this openfold river vs pat is fairly standard at some players. So if we assume we have the read, that he's openfolding a lot in these situations, is checking back our snow weak here, or we just make a crying bet hoping he forgot to openfold?

Very nice video, some really epic moments, thanks!

Sure I mean taking 96 up against a 1 card draw with 2 cracks at it we are like a little better than even money, I'd call that thin. Not to say there is another way to play the hand really.

sigh i thought it was on the turn. i agree its thin on the flop, but still correct.