Poker Video: Stud/Stud 8 by Joe Tall (Mid Stakes)

A Nightmare on 7th Street: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

A Nightmare on 7th Street: Episode Four by Joe Tall

Joe Tall plays 2 tables focusing on what you have learned so far in the first 3 episodes. He focuses on specific situations in Stud, how to adjust, and how to play marginal holdings. Watch as he plays 2 tables of 5/10 and 3/6 online.

About A Nightmare on 7th Street Subscribe to

Joe Tall continues where he left off in his mix-game videos to bring you a comprehensive guide to Stud Hi. This full series is geared to turn you into a Stud player starting at the intermediate level.

Tags

joe tall a nightmare on 7th street stud hi ante stealing structures 5/10 3/6

Video Details

  • Game: mixed
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 46 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for A Nightmare on 7th Street: Episode Four

or track by Email or RSS


sweetjazz3

Avatar for sweetjazz3

2035 posts
Joined 02/2007

Time Link to 00:25:54

The fifth street raise has to be the four flush and then he caught a pair of nines on the end, no? Makes a lot more sense than him limping 9s on third and then raising them on 5th after you catch J-T on 4th and 5th.

Posted over 3 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6688 posts
Joined 11/2006

The fifth street raise has to be the four flush and then he caught a pair of nines on the end, no? Makes a lot more sense than him limping 9s on third and then raising them on 5th after you catch J-T on 4th and 5th.



Well after review, that might be the actual case/results, he limped after one player and in front of an Ace. Many with weak/small pairs will do this, so 9/9 is definitely in this range. Usually you can get a c/r in here on 6th, I guess he limped with the trash Kd8d9c and did pick up the 4-flush that's why he didnt bet 6th.

Posted over 3 years ago

frappeboy

Avatar for frappeboy

6 posts
Joined 11/2008

Time Link to 00:06:20

What are your thoughts on raising 6th street here? When you make open sixes and he calls 5th street, he almost always has a four flush.. Seems to me you can raise here and then bet the river and you'll likely get him to fold unimproved 9s.. You may even get him to fold 2 small pair, but even if that's not the case, you will atleast get value the times you both make 2 pair on the river.

Posted over 3 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6688 posts
Joined 11/2006

What are your thoughts on raising 6th street here? When you make open sixes and he calls 5th street, he almost always has a four flush.. Seems to me you can raise here and then bet the river and you'll likely get him to fold unimproved 9s.. You may even get him to fold 2 small pair, but even if that's not the case, you will atleast get value the times you both make 2 pair on the river.



I'm going to have to agree with you after review. I like it. Had I been single tabling or not making a video I may raise there and follow through on the river for sure 100% if you raise 6th. I nearly get out the points/logic to raise when I decide he only has a pair of 9s, I just start counting outs for the sake of the video and call.

However, I will say such a line is a little more for a higher stake game against a little more thinking players, where they might fold 2-pair, as most do not.

Posted over 3 years ago

sweetjazz3

Avatar for sweetjazz3

2035 posts
Joined 02/2007

Well after review, that might be the actual case/results, he limped after one player and in front of an Ace. Many with weak/small pairs will do this, so 9/9 is definitely in this range.



Interesting point. Is it ever correct to overlimp in this spot with a hand like [9h 9s] 7h with live cards when there are some big doorcards behind you? If so, what conditions are you looking for to overlimp instead of completing or folding?

Posted over 3 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

What are your thoughts on raising 6th street here? When you make open sixes and he calls 5th street, he almost always has a four flush.. Seems to me you can raise here and then bet the river and you'll likely get him to fold unimproved 9s.. You may even get him to fold 2 small pair, but even if that's not the case, you will atleast get value the times you both make 2 pair on the river.


I play this as JT did. Hearts are dead. She is obv a fish and will not fold anything when calling vs the A66 on 5th. If we raise 6th and bet the river we've bloated the pot and won't get many folds from bad players.

Posted over 3 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

Time Link to 00:17:20

I would strongly consider stealing here. The opponents seem to be resonably tight (plus the bring-in is busy chatting all the time) and we have a 2flush and 2 overs to back us up. They will know that we're stealing in the majority of cases, but the can't do anything against it because they are full of crap themselves and the pot isn't that big.

Posted over 3 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

Time Link to 00:41:29

I mostly check behind here. He might have 77 or a 4flush (diamonds and 7s are super live), so the freecard would be more beneficial to us than to him. I'd also hate it to get x/r. Definitly checking behind on 5th street vs his board.

Posted over 3 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

Interesting point. Is it ever correct to overlimp in this spot with a hand like [9h 9s] 7h with live cards when there are some big doorcards behind you? If so, what conditions are you looking for to overlimp instead of completing or folding?


I would say it mostly depends on the opponents behind us. If they are tough and aggressive we should fold often. Vs bad and passive opponents limp along.

Posted over 3 years ago

red18

Avatar for red18

19 posts
Joined 07/2008

I mostly check behind here. He might have 77 or a 4flush (diamonds and 7s are super live), so the freecard would be more beneficial to us than to him. I'd also hate it to get x/r. Definitly checking behind on 5th street vs his board.



Are we done with the hand if we check back on 4th and don't improve, or is this just saving a bet when we are a dog to his range?

Posted over 3 years ago

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

Are we done with the hand if we check back on 4th and don't improve, or is this just saving a bet when we are a dog to his range?


If we brick and he doesn't catch a 2Heart, 2Spade, 3Heart, 3Spade, 4Heart, 4Spade, 5Club or 5Spade we have to fold if he bets into us because of potsize and our equity. I'm assuming a very wide range (22-88,*s*s,*7,BB,BM,98,8T,T9|7d) here, vs tighter ranges it's even worse. Play with ProPokerTools to alter ranges.

Posted over 3 years ago

Raist0000

Avatar for Raist0000

168 posts
Joined 07/2007

great video! For some next video maybe it would be nice to have some particular spots where typical players don't raise but there is equity to raise. some headsup or multiway spots where we have enough equity to raise but few players realize it.

Some comments on this video:

2:20 in the left table, you fold a gutshot with an ace in a 3way pot getting 5:1 pot odds. I think the implied odds of 3 big bet streets are enough for calling no??

15:25 in the right table a Q door in a obvious steal spot raises and you have (79)8 with live sixes and tens. I think a reraise can be considered, instead of a fold.

21:30 in the left you fold 765 in a multiway limped pot. The hand is not very good because you have a couple of dead cards, but its too cheap to see 4th street, getting 7:1 and again, the implied odds are probably high no?

30:09 your idea of reraising (6A)6 against a reraising 7... i dont like it very much. i dont think you are gaining much fold equity if any, and you are probably behind. but on the other maybe its ok to do that sometimes to balance the times you reraise with a big hidden pair or rolled up sixes (in case it is necessary to balance against that particular opponent)

46:02 left table, im not sure why you called 3rd getting 3,5:1, and then folded 4th getting 6,5:1 when not much has changed. everybody catch bricks (you have another ten so very unlikely they have paired it). i think its probably best to fold third, but if i call third i think calling fourth is ok

Posted over 3 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6688 posts
Joined 11/2006

I appreciate your comments, keep them coming! If you are going to leave specific questions, Watch This Video, and leave a time link, thanks.

Posted over 3 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6688 posts
Joined 11/2006

I would strongly consider stealing here. The opponents seem to be resonably tight (plus the bring-in is busy chatting all the time) and we have a 2flush and 2 overs to back us up. They will know that we're stealing in the majority of cases, but the can't do anything against it because they are full of crap themselves and the pot isn't that big.



That's the whole thing, the pot isn't that big. But having that same door is a trap. When you are called you are toast, as they are NOT full of crap and KNOW you are!

Posted over 3 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMixed Games → A Nightmare on 7th Street : Episode Four