Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
Hello DC
I played this hand on Ipoker, and somehow Im not able to receive the HHs from there. So I will try to do this another way, and I hope you can understand it.
3rd street:
Hero holds: 8
K
|2
Villain holds: XX|Q
Dead cards are: 3d, Qs, 8d, Tc
I bring-in, villain complete, I raise, which villain calls.
4th street:
Hero holds: 8
K
|2
9
Villain holds: XX|Q
2
I bet, villain calls.
5th street:
Hero holds: 8
K
|2
9
8
Villain holds: XX|Q
2
9
I check, villain check
6th street:
Hero holds: 8
K
|2
9
8
3
Villain holds: XX|Q
2
9
6
I check, villain bet, I call
7th street:
Hero holds: 8
K
|2
9
8
3
4
Villain holds: XX|Q
2
9
6
|X
I check, villain bet, I call
I hope this makes any sense. I would really enjoy some feedback, as im unsure if I lvled myself into calling 6th.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
UU!I.I.4AAUU35
1167 posts
Joined 07/2010
Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
grandmofftarkin
493 posts
Joined 04/2011
Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
grandmofftarkin
493 posts
Joined 04/2011
Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
rubbishaka80
549 posts
Joined 07/2007
Reads would be nice. Also, villains position is important i.e. was he completing from early position or last to act.
I don't necessarily expect villain to always 3-bet 3rd with split Queens.
Also, how are you acting first in these situations? Isn't he the high board with a Q?
This. That would also explain his "weird" check on 5th, he was going for the check-call.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
Im sorry for the bad layout, it was a bit hard to remember the hand correctly. Ipoker doesn't show it in a replayer. He might not 3bet queens 3rd, but wouldn't you expect him to raise it at some point, esp with my board?
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
UU!I.I.4AAUU35
1167 posts
Joined 07/2010
Care to explain
Well on 3rd and 4th you are just semi bluffing a backdoor flush, but your board doesn't help you rep much, so I don't like those bets. If you had a strong looking board, like K-A or something that would be better. Then when you pair up, you check. I think that is a better card to bluff, since you actually have equity. And then you pay off on the later streets when it should be obvious you're beat, since he's pretty much repping QQ+ and I don't think he's likely bluffing. Just my opinion, maybe he's bluffing, just doesn't seem likely.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Code
506 posts
Joined 01/2011
You think its bad for me to bet my 100% live 3flush on 3rd and 4th, where its very likely i have the best draw? I believe i have more equity with my 3flush then with my pair of 8's. I might be wrong, but I think its unlikely for him to have split Q here.
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
grandmofftarkin
493 posts
Joined 04/2011
You think its bad for me to bet my 100% live 3flush on 3rd and 4th, where its very likely i have the best draw? I believe i have more equity with my 3flush then with my pair of 8's. I might be wrong, but I think its unlikely for him to have split Q here.
Split Q's aren't your only consideration here, but as a side note I agree I don't think he auto 3bets any split Q here. What do you think his range is for completing here? I'm not sure you have the best draw...
[I think I entered the range correctly?]
ProPokerTools Stud Hi Simulation
600,000 trials (Randomized)
dead cards: 3
,Q
,8
,T
HERO: 8
K
| 2
9
47.56% (285,293 wins, 84 ties)
Villain Range: A J, A K, A T, A 9, J T, 77-33, *c *c | Q
2
52.44% (314,623 wins, 84 ties)
[Edit: whoops, take out 33 in the hole. It doesnt really change your equity much though]
Posted over 1 year ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote