Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by KRANTZ (Mid Stakes)

Never Tell Me the Odds: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Never Tell Me the Odds: Episode Four by KRANTZ

FenderJaguar gets the tables running at $2/4 as KRANTZ looks over his shoulder.

About Never Tell Me the Odds Subscribe to

Get a look inside KRANTZ's coaching program. How do you take a mid-stakes grinder and turn him into a high stakes juggernaut? Watch FenderJaguar's poker world get turned upside down.

Tags

krantz never tell me the odds 400nl 400 nl $2/4 2-tabling

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 59 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Never Tell Me the Odds: Episode Four

or track by Email or RSS


raziel2689

Avatar for raziel2689

2 posts
Joined 08/2009

Any information on where I can get that table theme + cards please?
Looks great.

Also great vid!

Posted over 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

Any information on where I can get that table theme + cards please?
Looks great.

Also great vid!



Tiltbuster.com has tons of stuff.

Posted over 3 years ago

vandelay

Avatar for vandelay

25 posts
Joined 09/2008

If there's enough interest I can probably do something like that Smile post it in the member contributions etc. I'm a bit rusty but I think I still got a bit o' skill Smile



I would watch that vid

Posted over 3 years ago

Burtin

Avatar for Burtin

185 posts
Joined 08/2008

peten2toms

Avatar for peten2toms

362 posts
Joined 01/2008

Time Link to 00:07:21

I feel like this Cbet is -EV given what we have seen from villain thus far even though this is the nut board to cbet.

Posted over 3 years ago

MPHansen

Avatar for MPHansen

2001 posts
Joined 07/2008

Great video. As someone who used to play a ton of magic I definitely think poker is tougher, on the surface poker is more simple but once you start learning more that's not the case imo.

Posted over 3 years ago

peten2toms

Avatar for peten2toms

362 posts
Joined 01/2008

Time Link to 00:20:06

This seems like an easy value shove. What range are we assigning this guy that gets to the river and is now going to bluff when checked to? It seems like he has more bluff catchers and weak made hands than bluffs. Also if we ever three barrel bluff here when we dont jam TP2ndK how are we balancing our range? As of late I feel like people love to be heroic in 3bet pots therefore we should be jamming and given him that opportunity.

Posted over 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

what font u use on ur HUD Grin



it's called Century Gothic. it's from the movie A Clockwork Orange. Grin

Posted over 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

I feel like this Cbet is -EV given what we have seen from villain thus far even though this is the nut board to cbet.



you may be right, this was kinda auto-pilot.

Posted over 3 years ago

FenderJaguar

Avatar for FenderJaguar

891 posts
Joined 01/2008

Great video. As someone who used to play a ton of magic I definitely think poker is tougher, on the surface poker is more simple but once you start learning more that's not the case imo.



poker and magic are similar for tons and tons of reasons, but ultimately magic has more variables that you have to pay more attention to more of the time, which gives you more chances to make more mistakes, which gives the better and best players more chances to realize their edge. don't get me wrong I'm not trying to discredit the depth of poker in any way at all. just saying that on average, average players are going to do far worse in magic than they are in poker.

Posted over 3 years ago

themightyjim2k

Avatar for themightyjim2k

415 posts
Joined 04/2007

Time Link to 00:03:40

I really don't like the check back on the turn when we turn the flush. I think a small bet (like $80 or so) is perfect because it gets value from all of his pair+FD hands that just aren't going to fold for that price considering you can be bluffing and they don't want you to be bluffing for that cheap. And if he has TP or better he might just spaz c/ship, and we may get a c/ship out of AQ or AK with the Ac. plus we're always getting value from his overpairs and I don't think we can assume that 2/4 regs will always double barrel overpairs on that board since I've seen regs take all kinds of lines that don't always make sense.

I think checking back just costs us too much $$ against a lot of the weaker part of his range that we aren't going to get huge value from on the river when a lot of cards might kill our action. and when we check back and allow the river to come we never give villain a chance to jam worse hands which he's often going to do when he has the Ac or an overpair. By checking back we give villain a free shot to realize his equity when he has the Ac, and we are going to have a tough time getting stacks in against an overpair if a card come that completes some draws.

also by betting small like this on the turn with the nuts we can also balance when we've floated against a villain in a 3bet pot and want to be able to bluff cheaply.

Posted over 3 years ago

pr0wler

Avatar for pr0wler

82 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:36:27

I think he would bet a jack there very often. It's the Phil Hellmuth blocker bet, Ace is a scare card so he wants to bet to get thin value and also prevent us from betting large on the river/control the pot. I like an overbet to like $160 to get him off any jack, only has to work like 1/2 times. He doesn't have AJ ever because he'd bet more on the river with that hand, his small bet sizing seems very weak.

Posted over 3 years ago

chomp

Avatar for chomp

155 posts
Joined 03/2008

Fender - very good play and very coherent and sharp analysis in this video. I think you trumped the teacher in this one.

Posted over 3 years ago

Lowkey

Avatar for Lowkey

4 posts
Joined 11/2009

Time Link to 00:56:47

This show would definitely need live play by play from the multi tabling stunt man.

Posted over 3 years ago

Choparno

Avatar for Choparno

77 posts
Joined 08/2008

Time Link to 00:52:56

I notice we insta-mucked 22 from the SB to cheet's BTN open. Given the BB is a fish I thought this would be a call, even if he is 3betting a decent amount. Does this become a call the fishier the BB is and the less he squeezes?

Posted over 3 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Never Tell Me the Odds : Episode Four