This being bi-weekly sucks ![]()
Ansky is playing 4 tables of mid-stakes Zoom poker.
Ansky plays live zoom 6max sessions in the Ghost-like series.
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
This being bi-weekly sucks ![]()
Time Link to 00:06:49
vs. this 17/12, I assume we are 3bet/folding 22? I know you are a proponent of adding small PP's to your 3bet-to-5bet range, but what makes you 3bet vs. this particular player? Given we have <200 hands on him, and maybe you aren't sure how he reacts to resteals, shouldn't we look to 3bet a range that plays better post-flop ie. suited middling cards?
This grabs my attention because I am having trouble finding spots to 3bet-to-5bet these small pairs as you suggest.
Time Link to 00:09:21
I really have a question on this spot and would like to hear your toughts.
On table 4 with 79s isnt it an akward spot to call a 3 bet pre in this spot, considering vilain plays with only with 50bb? Yes I agree, considering pot odds only and our equity, this call seems good,but because of SPR, we will have a hard time making any kind of moves postflop, can we? I mean, can we call with the intention of playing fit or fold postflop?
Maybe I have a small leak here, but I tend to fold a lot of these hands vs shortstackers min 3 bet.
Time Link to 00:18:41
Another interesting spot that draw my attention.
I understand that you called here because we have some equity, but I guess that vilain is not barrelling a lot of turns, I mean vs an aggro player, woulnt it be a bluff raise or fold OTF? Also, any chance you are turning your hand into a bluff when facing a turn barrel when unimproved (no A, no 7 or on
OTT).
By the way, very good vid! ![]()
Please make these vids twice a week and treble my subscription fee!
If he bets river its a snap right with the AJo on 55J28?
oh yes.
vs. this 17/12, I assume we are 3bet/folding 22? I know you are a proponent of adding small PP's to your 3bet-to-5bet range, but what makes you 3bet vs. this particular player? Given we have <200 hands on him, and maybe you aren't sure how he reacts to resteals, shouldn't we look to 3bet a range that plays better post-flop ie. suited middling cards?
This grabs my attention because I am having trouble finding spots to 3bet-to-5bet these small pairs as you suggest.
You aren't wrong, and I probably wouldn't 3/5 vs this particular guy, but 3betting 22 might still be ok vs him. He probably folds a lot and is likely to fold a decent amount post when he misses, but as you said 22 isn't the best hand to have here. I could probably cut out 22-55 and try to add in more T6s type stuff to my range here.
I really have a question on this spot and would like to hear your toughts.
On table 4 with 79s isnt it an akward spot to call a 3 bet pre in this spot, considering vilain plays with only with 50bb? Yes I agree, considering pot odds only and our equity, this call seems good,but because of SPR, we will have a hard time making any kind of moves postflop, can we? I mean, can we call with the intention of playing fit or fold postflop?
Maybe I have a small leak here, but I tend to fold a lot of these hands vs shortstackers min 3 bet.
I don't think I can fold to the small 3bet in position. Obviously when he has an overpair i lose money on the call, but I pretty much have to be making money vs non paired hands.
Another interesting spot that draw my attention.
I understand that you called here because we have some equity, but I guess that vilain is not barrelling a lot of turns, I mean vs an aggro player, woulnt it be a bluff raise or fold OTF? Also, any chance you are turning your hand into a bluff when facing a turn barrel when unimproved (no A, no 7 or onOTT).
By the way, very good vid!
I probably should c/f this hand, but I also should have bet the river. He's way too likely to have bet a pp on the turn, and will almost never bluff. I think betting river is a lot better than checking.
Time Link to 00:08:42
Table 2, what are your toughts on raising this river bet as a rebluff? I think this may be a spot I get suckered into getting too aggro on. Once a bunch of draws lead brick off, do you think players take this call, call, lead line as a bluff often enough for us to profitably raise here?
Time Link to 00:26:04
What goes into your decision to fold your FD to the chk-raise on table 3? I feel this is a spot I would call a lot with perceived implied odds. Maybe it's a leak.
Really enjoying your series!!!
What goes into your decision to fold your FD to the chk-raise on table 3? I feel this is a spot I would call a lot with perceived implied odds. Maybe it's a leak.
Really enjoying your series!!!
I wondered about this spot too. OTT, he needs to call 43 to win 120, so that's 3:1 immediate odds. We need to win just over 200 otr just to break even on a turn call (since we're only about 20% to hit flush ott). So, it seems to be a matter of deciding whether we get significantly more than an additional 80 dollars on the river if we hit.
Home → Poker Forums → Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Zoom Poker : Episode Two