Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by BalugaWhale (Mid Stakes)

The Baluga Show: Episode Two

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

The Baluga Show: Episode Two by BalugaWhale

BalugaWhale brings in his next contestant and brand new situations.

About The Baluga Show Subscribe to

Each week BalugaWhale brings on a new DC member and quizzes them on a variety of 6max situations.

Tags

hand replayer ipod friendly balugawhale hh review the baluga show

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 60 minutes long
  • Posted about 1 year ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for The Baluga Show: Episode Two

or track by Email or RSS


BalugaWhale

Avatar for BalugaWhale

997 posts
Joined 01/2008

Im not too sure what to take from your comment, but ya alot, if not all poker decisions should depend on the villian when you are going to make a advanced play here. Not that I think its a great Idea to make a advanced play vs such a aggro villian that was described in this hand. Either way love the vid and love your work with poker. Thank you.


the more aggro the villain-- the better a play this is

Andrew

Posted about 1 year ago

zachucsb

Avatar for zachucsb

6 posts
Joined 01/2008

First hand, I prefer c/r any turn over c/c, c/c because villain has only 80bb to start.

Pot size on turn will be 35bb, if villain bets 2/3 pot that would be 23bb, making total pot size 81bb once we call. Effective stacks will be 40bb.

Even bad aggressive players shutdown their bluffs often when they dont have a significant bet size left to bluff shove. Given that he will likely check rivers a lot I'd jam turn. If he was even just 20bb deeper I like a c/c.

Zach

Posted 12 months ago

zachucsb

Avatar for zachucsb

6 posts
Joined 01/2008

edit: I agreed with all your other answers. Nice work.

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Time Link to 00:19:48

Andrew,

You make a good argument for raising in Round 3, but doesn't always raising here wreak havoc on our calling range? It seems to me that if you raise all your strong hands (boats and trips), then a call suddenly means with 100% certainty "I have a PP jacks or less". And villain has enough value hands that he can just barrel us off it.

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Time Link to 00:32:51

"No determining factor of what he does against 3bets"

But do we need to know? We know that he opens wide, and that he gives up. So based on that alone, doesn't it make sense that we would want to keep our weaker hands in our calling range (to give them more value when we bluff them after his flop check backs) and keep our 3betting range full of strong hands?

Posted 12 months ago

gaming_mouse

Avatar for gaming_mouse

90 posts
Joined 02/2007

Time Link to 00:32:51

Small request: Is it possible to download the slides somewhere?

Posted 12 months ago

StackHunter

Avatar for StackHunter

2648 posts
Joined 09/2010

Round 5 (QdJd hand)
I chose answer E) as well, but I thought by "reraising" you meant check-raising, not 3-betting. If he is capable of giving up on the flop sometimes, then it means his c-betting range is stronger = if we want to x/r, we should lean towards value.

Posted 12 months ago

iluv68

Avatar for iluv68

655 posts
Joined 03/2011

Time Link to 00:16:33

I was way off on Round 3 w/the KhKs2h flop with our 22. Let me think through this...(also, when you give the sizes of stacks are we assuming the largest stack is the effective stacks? I assume yes? Otherwise it's useless to say they have 150bb when we only have 100bb...)

Regarding short stack:
- we assume villain has inelastic calling range and will never fold w/fdraws and Kx and will not fold turn with those hands
- whether we call or raise won't matter to this villain (given THIS range) as all his money goes in on turn regardless
- we like raising to prevent a call by short stack w/PP's that might randomly peal if we just call??? Seems like we want a peal from that part of villain's range with so little equity?

Regarding tight-aggressive regular:
- calling twice is not ideal because this villain will NOT bluff rivers w/busted draws
- raising is good because we get more $$$ from the flush draws and Kx in villain's range on both flop and turn AND possibly river if it blanks and villain is stubborn with Kx hands

Therefore:
It's most +EV to extract as much value from flush draws and Kx hands from TAG regular by raising on flop than it is to bait a loose call from the shortstack w/PP's. That makes a ton of sense given the effective stacks of 150bb w/the TAG

Posted 10 months ago

AycheDubbleYou

Avatar for AycheDubbleYou

233 posts
Joined 06/2012

When you pause, there's is a minimize button in the top right corner that makes the overlay go away.


That is THE Greatest piece of info I've gotten in a long time. LOL

Posted 10 months ago

AycheDubbleYou

Avatar for AycheDubbleYou

233 posts
Joined 06/2012

(I have watched only the 1st episode so far)

Feedback to the series
- Excellent idea of "a game show", it is very exciting
- It forces us to think while watching
- It is good for any player, from micro stakes up to mid stakes

I think the series has so much potential, that it could be improved a bit. I'd love to see some pictures and animations (maybe even sounds). Especially pictures, because it would be much easier to answer the question.
Here is my idea of how the "answer screen" could look like:

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/5452/round7u.png


FANTASTIC IDEA ...would def make the series a little bit easier to follow without constant pause,and re-reading.

Posted 10 months ago

nosdag

Avatar for nosdag

2 posts
Joined 09/2012

Time Link to 00:21:56

So if you had JJ, would it still be clear Raise?

Posted 8 months ago

ralphcifaretto

Avatar for ralphcifaretto

155 posts
Joined 12/2010




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → The Baluga Show : Episode Two