Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL Poker Forums

Yeah I think that'd lead you to the conclusion that villain is only capable of leading trips + then, which makes sense if we figure he's the kind of villain that's incapable of leading the turn thinly (and rightfully so regardless). That's a pretty sick fold on the turn then, I don't know if I could make it in game. Thanks.

Interesting hand and discussion. My two cents about all its worth since I play micro, is MP had 66 PP. My reasoning is he leads out with 3BB raise kinda standard (I think for small PP) You 3B, BB calls. I think that this is why MP stays in. With that much in the Pot he pretty much has to call. I think he checks the Flop when he hits his Set. Probably thinking since you have been playing aggro and you 3B PF you will bet. On the Turn either the Flush Draw worries him possible you have AhKh or he puts you on over-pair and figures your not folding. River he figures he has you and wants to stack you.

How is my analysis on this hand? Good? Way off?

On the Turn either the Flush Draw worries him possible you have AhKh [...]

He flopped a full house with 66.

Besides that, AKhh is only one combination - and not worth to "protect" it, given he had no full house. If he had a set - his only (!) concern would be that Hero checks behind - not that he might get sucked out.

He flopped a full house with 66.
.

Opps didnt put that together. I was just thinking about his PF raise and call and it looked like a Set to me. I would have to change Turn action to he figures Hero is on the Hook, big PP and will Call.