Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Hielko (Mid Stakes)

Ghost: Hielko (#4) - 4-tabling 200NL on PokerStars

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Ghost: Hielko (#4) - 4-tabling 200NL on PokerStars by Hielko

Hielko is cruising along at 200NL on PokerStars and he's bringing you along for the ride.

About Ghost Subscribe to

Ghost the best of DeucesCracked in the shorthanded games they play in today.

Tags

hielko ghost 200nl 200 nl $1/2 pokerstars nlhe 6max

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 41 minutes long
  • Posted over 1 year ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Ghost: Hielko (#4) - 4-tabling 200NL on PokerStars

or track by Email or RSS


doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

Majkel

Avatar for Majkel

143 posts
Joined 07/2009

Time Link to 00:29:13

Don't you think it's good spot to 3bet this raise of a fish and bloat a pot IP with a hand that makes TPGK often?

Posted over 1 year ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

Time Link to 00:04:44

Haha funny you say that. My friend plays highstakes up to Sek 10k deep (some $15/30+). He got some cash on Stars from buying a piece of someone yesterday and because of limit restriction put $800 on 2/4 deep, just one table with like 5 other on his regular site. He was a bronze star, 1 tabler, search feature on, and has hyper aggro style with stuff like calling 5bets oop etc. Within 20 minutes there was a 12 strong wait list with just one other 2/4 deep table running lol and others wit people sat out.

You gotta love the MSNL bum hunter regs, he left 3 hours later with 3k stack and completely ran them over.

Posted over 1 year ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

And I just read the fun discussion about the K7s hand love it A+! Smile

a lot of people will do it even when it is immediately roughly break even play, because they make money off of it no matter what happens. Villain folds - free money, they won't get 4bet so much. Villain snaps with QQ+AK? Voilla retarded image IP. I wish I would not lose more in EV by tilting myself more than I gain in meta game Frown

Posted over 1 year ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

Time Link to 00:24:26

lol you really like getting it in. I've been watching some people that play deep and 100bb at higher limits feels like short stacking where it revolves around ending the hand pf a ton these days. I really hope the NLHE scene will start leaning towards deep poker

Posted over 1 year ago

Buby2132

Avatar for Buby2132

1456 posts
Joined 09/2010

lol you really like getting it in. I've been watching some people that play deep and 100bb at higher limits feels like short stacking where it revolves around ending the hand pf a ton these days. I really hope the NLHE scene will start leaning towards deep poker



Fairly standard to get QQ in pre.

Posted over 1 year ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

Hey Hielko,could you explain why you think calling in this spot is,as you said not terrible?I mean how much of his range can you really beat?i actually felt a small amount of pain when you made the call Smile


See my previous reply to Tackleberry

Posted over 1 year ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

Don't you think it's good spot to 3bet this raise of a fish and bloat a pot IP with a hand that makes TPGK often?


Agree with you, a 3bet here would be good.

Posted over 1 year ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

lol you really like getting it in. I've been watching some people that play deep and 100bb at higher limits feels like short stacking where it revolves around ending the hand pf a ton these days. I really hope the NLHE scene will start leaning towards deep poker


It is, altough i doubt that more than 100bb will really become standard. But at least most sites now offer deep tables, and a lot of sites now have min buyins at 35~40bb for standard tables.

Posted over 1 year ago

doc.lemon

Avatar for doc.lemon

1790 posts
Joined 07/2009

Fairly standard to get QQ in pre.


55. And it still is when you 3bet, that's how 100bb poker is these days

Posted over 1 year ago

CH74

Avatar for CH74

368 posts
Joined 01/2010

One more question about K7s if you don't mind Smile Let's assume on the next orbit the same exact hand happens to take place. He raises, same position, same hand.

Do you fold now, 3-bet-fold, or 3 bet-shove?

Posted over 1 year ago

Prologion

Avatar for Prologion

2079 posts
Joined 03/2010

Time Link to 00:10:01

Great Vid Mr. Hielko Smile

@this JT-hand.
Imo it is even a good spot to also throw in a 3rdBarell-Bluff on a blankriver (should Villain have C/Called), just b/c your valuerange is sooo much bigger than his (you have AA, AK in your range, he mostly not; you have more KQ-combos, you have T7-and 75-combos in your range and still the sets and much more 2pairs in your range).

Posted over 1 year ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

One more question about K7s if you don't mind Smile Let's assume on the next orbit the same exact hand happens to take place. He raises, same position, same hand.

Do you fold now, 3-bet-fold, or 3 bet-shove?


Would probably go for just a fold or a 3bet/fold, thinking that a 200NL reg is not going crazy and try two 4bet bluffs in a row when the first one failed, and he's more likely to 4bet for thin value.

Posted over 1 year ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

Great Vid Mr. Hielko Smile

@this JT-hand.
Imo it is even a good spot to also throw in a 3rdBarell-Bluff on a blankriver (should Villain have C/Called), just b/c your valuerange is sooo much bigger than his (you have AA, AK in your range, he mostly not; you have more KQ-combos, you have T7-and 75-combos in your range and still the sets and much more 2pairs in your range).


Villain here is a fish, so deep considerations on how our range should be perceived isn't really relevant. If the river is a blank and the flush misses I doubt that it's a good bluff here.

Posted over 1 year ago

Prologion

Avatar for Prologion

2079 posts
Joined 03/2010

Villain here is a fish, so deep considerations on how our range should be perceived isn't really relevant. If the river is a blank and the flush misses I doubt that it's a good bluff here.



Ooops, missed obv. that Villain was a fish.
Thought he was a REG^^

Posted over 1 year ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Ghost : Hielko (#4) - 4-tabling 200NL on PokerStars