Yay! Boy have i been waiting!! ![]()
FoxwoodsFiend breaks down some 6-max hand histories, examining a preflop spot with TT and some tricky lines that went wrong.
Dear FoxwoodsFiend, how do I play this hand? Ariel plays Sherlock in this interactive member hand history review series at mid and high stakes No Limit. Each episode concludes with a review of one of FWF’s own hands. Keep an eye out for some hands from our Executive Producers, as well!
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
Yay! Boy have i been waiting!! ![]()
At start loved your explanation.
Something that im confused about at the start is you puit villain on a 4betting calling shove range of AQ+/TT+.
I just dont necessarily agree with that and think that his range would more be QQ+/Ak or JJ+/AK as hands like TT and AQ would rather just defend to those 3bets (especially without history)
Am I thinking about this correctly?
If that is the case we would need to increase our fold equity to 43% which is a huge difference, and is where I really face tough spots as I cannot ever seeing having 43% equity if we 5bet shove.
Can I hear your thoughts on this....
Please never stop making videos!
Your calc on the EV of hero shoving is wrong.
You have the tie percentage as a decimal as 0.104 when it's actually 0.0104. Also, 428*0.3925 is 167.99, so we should round that to 168. Also, 167-212+3 = -42, not -45. That changes the math to:
168-212+0.3=-44
Your calc on the EV of hero shoving is wrong.
You have the tie percentage as a decimal as 0.104 when it's actually 0.0104. Also, 428*0.3925 is 167.99, so we should round that to 168. Also, 167-212+3 = -42, not -45. That changes the math to:
168-212+0.3=-44
wow it changes everything !
Your calc on the EV of hero shoving is wrong.
You have the tie percentage as a decimal as 0.104 when it's actually 0.0104. Also, 428*0.3925 is 167.99, so we should round that to 168. Also, 167-212+3 = -42, not -45. That changes the math to:
168-212+0.3=-44
So it's a clear fold then!
It changes nothing because the two mistakes just happened to even each other out
At start loved your explanation.
Something that im confused about at the start is you puit villain on a 4betting calling shove range of AQ+/TT+.
I just dont necessarily agree with that and think that his range would more be QQ+/Ak or JJ+/AK as hands like TT and AQ would rather just defend to those 3bets (especially without history)
Am I thinking about this correctly?
If that is the case we would need to increase our fold equity to 43% which is a huge difference, and is where I really face tough spots as I cannot ever seeing having 43% equity if we 5bet shove.
Can I hear your thoughts on this....
I think you're right. I don't think it makes much of a difference: I was just trying to show the methodology more than anything else, and that range was reasonably close enough to give a good sense of how much fold equity you need. Keep in mind he could 4bet call it off with KQ or 99 also: there's no clear answer as to what his range is, so i just picked one to illustrate the math
Your calc on the EV of hero shoving is wrong.
You have the tie percentage as a decimal as 0.104 when it's actually 0.0104. Also, 428*0.3925 is 167.99, so we should round that to 168. Also, 167-212+3 = -42, not -45. That changes the math to:
168-212+0.3=-44
i knew i'd do something like that wrong. hopefully the video was still salvageable
i knew i'd do something like that wrong. hopefully the video was still salvageable
The concepts are way more important than actually getting all the #s right ![]()
the numbers make my head hurt as always cause im an idiot but the hand reviews were pretty interesting
high five
This video is pure gold. Foxwood you are one of the best instructors on any coaching site I've been so far.
I also agree that to become a great player you need to understand those numbers and have them kinda in your head but too many including myself are too lazy to do that much of work =)
Keep the great videos coming!
I was just wondering if someone could convert the equations to a Excel sheet so we just could put in the numbers and get the equity?
My math knowledge isn't good enough to free X from the X*42+(1-X)(-91) equation. So it is enough if someone could solve just that part, then I can probably fix the excel sheet myself.
[Takes so much time to do all the calculations by hand when I want to test out different scenarios]
Great video!
Maybe the best video ever, on any site. Can´t wait until next one.
Home → Poker Forums → Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Dear FoxwoodsFiend : Season Premiere