Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Grindcore (Mid Stakes)

The Thin Red Grind: Episode Six

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

The Thin Red Grind: Episode Six by Grindcore

Grindcore plays 200NL and discusses his hands as well as playing short-handed.

About The Thin Red Grind Subscribe to

Grindcore brings his talents back to the DeucesCracked video lineup. Theory and live sweats from 50NL to 400NL.

Tags

grindcore the thin red grind 200nl $1/2 200 nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 60 minutes long
  • Posted over 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for The Thin Red Grind: Episode Six

or track by Email or RSS


Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

table with A9 on 3bet pot, would you call when vilain c/R the river for 35?



Snap. It's extremely unlikely that I'm beat when he checks river. Hands strong enough to c/r river will very likely bet larger on the turn or check turn. Hands like AQ just double barrel, probably another underbet for the same reasons he thought it was good on the turn. When he bets so small on the turn he usually has SD value so he doesn't have to bluff river, so I'm not sure exactly what I beat when he checkraises, but I'll leave that up to him.

Posted over 2 years ago

PaperV

Avatar for PaperV

19 posts
Joined 01/2008

very good thoughts and explanation as per usual from you, thank you for the series so far

Posted over 2 years ago

doncorleone87

Avatar for doncorleone87

21 posts
Joined 08/2009

thx for the video GC - good job as always!


around min 17. You raise T7s on 79Ttt OTB. Reg in CO calls. turn is the 8 which completes the flush.

I really dislike your turn bet. This card hit your range so hard, its almost impossible for you to not have a set,straight or flush. How can you bet there - hoping he'll come over the top with an overpair? IMO this is a very clear check behind - decide (probably fold) river.

Posted over 2 years ago

KRDE87

Avatar for KRDE87

2 posts
Joined 09/2009

Time Link to 00:31:18

Why are you betting the turn that big with 97s if he is, like u say, not folding an ace? So you are planning to barrel the river him off an ace? Do you think this is profitable vs an unknown?

Posted over 2 years ago

pressinbuttons

Avatar for pressinbuttons

7 posts
Joined 01/2011

great video, also thanks for your contribute on improving my redline tremendously

Posted over 2 years ago

nemeelucas

Avatar for nemeelucas

192 posts
Joined 07/2008

Time Link to 00:14:35

I think that betting in this spot is thought provoking and good for the reasons you stated but I don't think he'd check shove aa or kk. I think if he shoves we're behind most of the time and when we're not he has pretty good equity with aa or kk qq with a diamond (even for a split). I mean I know the reason you're saying we should bet is b/c he likely wont ship a value hand that we beat that would rather/should call so we should bet. Thus we should then call if he's not shipping the btm end of his premium value range.

I know it's hard to make a flush but I think the pockets make up a smaller portion of his co open+cb+call rr range than a flush or combo draw. Which fds can we try to discount here when he bet/calls instead of getting it in on the flop? maybe he's not the type to open suited conns or gappers with a 40bb short stacker in the bb?

Posted about 2 years ago

Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

thx for the video GC - good job as always!


around min 17. You raise T7s on 79Ttt OTB. Reg in CO calls. turn is the 8 which completes the flush.

I really dislike your turn bet. This card hit your range so hard, its almost impossible for you to not have a set,straight or flush. How can you bet there - hoping he'll come over the top with an overpair? IMO this is a very clear check behind - decide (probably fold) river.



I talk about this at the end of the video. Maybe I should fold to a c/r and bet/call would be a mistake, but I'll rarely get c/r'd here.

Posted about 2 years ago

Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

Why are you betting the turn that big with 97s if he is, like u say, not folding an ace? So you are planning to barrel the river him off an ace? Do you think this is profitable vs an unknown?



I think you're mixing up hands. I had a 55 hand on 234A, where I'm betting large for value. I also played 97s at the same time where I bet ~half pot on Axxx with a FD when the pfr cbets and checks turn.

Posted about 2 years ago

Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

I think that betting in this spot is thought provoking and good for the reasons you stated but I don't think he'd check shove aa or kk. I think if he shoves we're behind most of the time and when we're not he has pretty good equity with aa or kk qq with a diamond (even for a split). I mean I know the reason you're saying we should bet is b/c he likely wont ship a value hand that we beat that would rather/should call so we should bet. Thus we should then call if he's not shipping the btm end of his premium value range.

I know it's hard to make a flush but I think the pockets make up a smaller portion of his co open+cb+call rr range than a flush or combo draw. Which fds can we try to discount here when he bet/calls instead of getting it in on the flop? maybe he's not the type to open suited conns or gappers with a 40bb short stacker in the bb?



Yeah maybe calling off a shove is a mistake. Still, I'll rarely get shoved on there, so even if I'd make the incorrect play vs the shove, the EV of the bet/call line is probably still better than for checking. I think I talk about his FD range at the end of the video. Correct me if I'm wrong, then I'll comment on it here.

Posted about 2 years ago

nemeelucas

Avatar for nemeelucas

192 posts
Joined 07/2008

Yeah maybe calling off a shove is a mistake. Still, I'll rarely get shoved on there, so even if I'd make the incorrect play vs the shove, the EV of the bet/call line is probably still better than for checking. I think I talk about his FD range at the end of the video. Correct me if I'm wrong, then I'll comment on it here.



Yeah I posted this before I saw the very end, it was well explained. I liked the bet I just thought calling the shove would be a mistake. Great series so far, looking forward to the last two. I particularly enjoy the hand reviews in the beginning and at the end.

Posted about 2 years ago

apv2009

Avatar for apv2009

219 posts
Joined 09/2010

apv2009

Avatar for apv2009

219 posts
Joined 09/2010

Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

Why not check back flop with the openended?



Assuming you mean the QJ hand... Yeah checking back is good too. I mostly want him to fold his ace highs when I bet there, which are a huge part of fishes preflop ranges. If the board (and my draw) was lower betting is better as there are more overcards you can barrel if you bet. If he's deeper you should also bet as you want to build the pot in case you hit. Larger potsizes amplify mistakes, so if it's close, usually go for the bet to get more value out of your edge.

Posted about 2 years ago

apv2009

Avatar for apv2009

219 posts
Joined 09/2010

Time Link to 00:41:09

Is your standard play to 3bet baby pairs BB vs SB, or you did it for some reason in particular? ty

Posted about 2 years ago

Grindcore

Avatar for Grindcore

2371 posts
Joined 11/2008

Is your standard play to 3bet baby pairs BB vs SB, or you did it for some reason in particular? ty



Yes it's my default play. You rarely flop a set and they're very weak low equity bluff catchers when you miss. Most people don't get stacks in super light without history so the value of a set also ain't that good. I rather play back at them a couple of times before I start flatting small pairs. They can also 5b shove, which is good because I'm 3betting light so I get 4b bluffed at a decent frequency.

Posted about 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → The Thin Red Grind : Episode Six