Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by FoxwoodsFiend (Mid Stakes)

Boosdoener: Episode Five

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Boosdoener: Episode Five by FoxwoodsFiend, Hielko

Hielko plays while FoxwoodsFiend sweats him at 4 tables of $2/4 6 max NLHE.

About Boosdoener Subscribe to

FoxwoodFiend takes Hielko under his wing as they explore what it takes to crush souls at 400NL and 600NL and make the move to 1000NL.

Tags

hielko foxwoodsfiend boosdoener $2/4 400nl 400 nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 56 minutes long
  • Posted over 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Boosdoener: Episode Five

or track by Email or RSS


PaperV

Avatar for PaperV

19 posts
Joined 01/2008

Time Link to 00:38:01

I am wondering why you don't call or 3bet table 1 w/ K10o vs 2.5x.

good video as all ways

Posted over 2 years ago

Graffa

Avatar for Graffa

10 posts
Joined 09/2008

why did you fold A6o at the button vs fish openlimp in CO araound min 24 topleft.

you isolate before T8o in CO vs MP.

could you please explain your thought process

Posted over 2 years ago

halvadron

Avatar for halvadron

255 posts
Joined 06/2009

thx, really cool stuff to keep my DC subscr

Posted over 2 years ago

Steppin Razor

Avatar for Steppin Razor

Section 9
2237 posts
Joined 12/2009

Luisma

Avatar for Luisma

22 posts
Joined 04/2008

Prologion

Avatar for Prologion

2079 posts
Joined 03/2010

Time Link to 00:27:05

That surprised me b/c I until this discussion thought that calling a small pockets is from any position vs. UTG-opens for Setvalue ok (when the Opener is not too short).
I mean,
haven`t you in general better Implieds vs. a UTG-Range....
Or vs. which ppl (100BB-stacks), you consider to fold here?
I guess from the CovsUTG, you always call?

Posted over 2 years ago

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

696 posts
Joined 09/2008

Ariel - any comments on the quality of 2-4 3-6 PS 2010 games.....how do they compare when they were your stomping ground?

Posted over 2 years ago

pr0wler

Avatar for pr0wler

82 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:07:48

I think this is a fold here on the river with QQ. He calls a 3-bet, then a c-bet on a K64 board. What is he calling with us here? 75 gets there on the river, Kx is gonna make up a huge part of his range. TT has decent showdown value so he's highly unlikely to bet that. Basically we're hoping for him to be turning 6x into a bluff and I just don't think he's doing that very often. His bet just screams "please call me" and based on experience when fish takes these type of lines in these kind of situations they have it like 90% of the time at least. These spots are very tough folds but I definitely think folding is the better option of the two.

Posted over 2 years ago

pr0wler

Avatar for pr0wler

82 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:25:37

Just for the sake of discussion, was anyone else not happy to get it in there with bottom set given the action taken by the clown? Honestly, as I was watching it and I saw the fish check min-raise I was thinking "he has a set here for sure".

If we are going to get it in with a set, which is fine IMO, why can't we call the turn raise in position? There are 0 flush draws out there to protect against, and if the fish is raising some Ax hand "for information" then we're giving him room to fold with the turn shove. Also, on the 1/50 chance he is bluffing we're giving him rope to continue on the river. We'll get our stacks in on the river 90% of the time anyway if he has some kind of 2-pair hand.

Posted over 2 years ago

Prologion

Avatar for Prologion

2079 posts
Joined 03/2010

Just for the sake of discussion, was anyone else not happy to get it in there with bottom set given the action taken by the clown? Honestly, as I was watching it and I saw the fish check min-raise I was thinking "he has a set here for sure".

If we are going to get it in with a set, which is fine IMO, why can't we call the turn raise in position? There are 0 flush draws out there to protect against, and if the fish is raising some Ax hand "for information" then we're giving him room to fold with the turn shove. Also, on the 1/50 chance he is bluffing we're giving him rope to continue on the river. We'll get our stacks in on the river 90% of the time anyway if he has some kind of 2-pair hand.



had similar thoughts on this one.

Posted over 2 years ago

mythrilfox

Avatar for mythrilfox

17 posts
Joined 01/2008

Hi FWF,

I was wondering if you could expand on analyzing regulars' preflop ranges away from the table and what exactly that entails. Obviously it's easy to go into HEM and see "oh he's 3betting this and 4betting this etc etc," but how would you go about using that information to formulate a plan against him? Seems to me a great deal of getting your plan down would just require in-game experimentation to see how he adjusts to various levels of aggression, so I'm having trouble thinking of what you could do away from the tables.

BTW, awesome video. really enjoyed it

Posted over 2 years ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

I am wondering why you don't call or 3bet table 1 w/ K10o vs 2.5x.


Probably just missed this hand while playing/talking.

Posted over 2 years ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

why did you fold A6o at the button vs fish openlimp in CO araound min 24 topleft.

you isolate before T8o in CO vs MP.

could you please explain your thought process


Think T8o has more playability, it flops more medium/good pairs that can be valuebet against the fish and you can obviously also hit some draws.

Posted over 2 years ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4352 posts
Joined 07/2008

Table 1, is this a Sq/fold w/AQs?


Pretty sure the plan is a 4bet/call.

Posted over 2 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Boosdoener : Episode Five